Cryotherapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Para-hisian Accessory Pathways
Safety and Efficacy of Cryotherapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Para-hisian Accessory Pathways: a Randomized Comparative Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized pilot study to evaluate safety and efficacy endpoints for treatment of para-hisian accessory pathways according to two different strategies of lesion formation. These patients will be divided into 2 groups with different strategies of treatment: group 1 treated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation, group 2 with cryotherapy (CRYO). The primary outcome will be the recurrence rate of accessory pathway conduction after one year of follow-up. Secondary endpoints will be immediate success and rate of permanent atrioventricular (AV) block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2021
CompletedMay 19, 2023
May 1, 2023
1.4 years
April 19, 2020
May 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
One-year recurrence rate
Recurrence rate of accessory pathway conduction, as assessed by follow-up Clinical recording and event monitoring external device (Holter/Looper).
One year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Immediate success rate
Time span between vein puncture (start of procedure) and sheath removal (end of procedure), comparing with baseline rhythm
Rate of atrioventricular block
up to 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Radiofrequency (RF)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwenty patients will be allocated to this group, which will be treated using radiofrequency (RF) ablation technique.
Cryotherapy (CRYO)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwenty patients will be allocated to this group, which will be treated using Cryotherapy (CRYO) ablation technique.
Interventions
Will be evaluated if percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation is superior to cryotherapy as treatment modality of para-hisian accessory pathways.
Will be evaluated if percutaneous cryotherapy catheter ablation is superior to radiofrequency as treatment modality of para-hisian accessory pathways.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with para-hisian accessory pathways, diagnosed by electrophysiological study (EPS), with indication of invasive treatment according to current guidelines. Patients should be willing and able to sign an informed consent form, and to undergo all procedures described in both the study protocol and the consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous cryotherapy ablation;
- Previous extensive radiofrequency ablation (including aortic cusp mapping);
- Age below twelve years;
- Severe coagulation disorder;
- Pregnancy;
- Refusal to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospitallead
- InCor Heart Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Arrhythmia Clinical Unit - Instituto do Coração - HCFMUSP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403010, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mauricio I Scanavacca, MD, PhD
Instituto do coração - HC/FMUSP
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Arrhythmia Unit Director - Heart Institute (InCor), MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2020
First Posted
April 24, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 28, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2021
Last Updated
May 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share