Transfoveal Micropulse Laser for Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema
Yellow Micropulse Laser 577-nm vs Infrared Diode Micropulse Laser 810-nm for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is currently the mainstay of treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). One of the main obstacles of anti-VEGF therapy is the need of repeated injections, which carries both economic and compliance problems to the patients.there is a growing evidence that recognises the effectiveness of the use of micropulse laser (MPL) in treatment of DME. with MPL, it is possible to deliver a subthreshold laser that is above the threshold of biochemical effect but below the threshold of a visible, destructive lesion thereby preventing collateral damage.The MPL technique is available at near - infrared 810 nm diode laser (diode MPL) and at 577 nm (yellow MPL). The current study was conducted in order to compare the efficacy of both MPL techniques in the treatment of center involving DME.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 22, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 1, 2020
CompletedJune 1, 2020
May 1, 2020
8 months
April 21, 2020
May 3, 2020
May 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)
detecting changes in the thickness of the center of the macula
baseline, at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention
Change in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
detecting changes in the the best corrected visual acuity in logMAR. A LogMAR chart comprises rows of letters and is used by ophthalmologists, optometrists and vision scientists to estimate visual acuity. This chart was developed at the National Vision Research Institute of Australia in 1976, and is designed to enable a more accurate estimate of acuity than do other charts (e.g., the Snellen chart). For this reason, the LogMAR chart is recommended, particularly in a research setting. A Snellen score of 6/6 (20/20), indicating that an observer can resolve details as small as 1 minute of visual angle, corresponds to a LogMAR of 0 (since the base-10 logarithm of 1 is 0); a Snellen score of 6/12 (20/40), indicating an observer can resolve details as small as 2 minutes of visual angle, corresponds to a LogMAR of 0.3 (since the base-10 logarithm of 2 is near-approximately 0.3), and so on.Therefore, a higher logMAR scores mean a worse outcome.
baseline, at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention
Study Arms (2)
Yellow MPL
ACTIVE COMPARATORDiode MPL
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
applying 577-nm yellow laser in a micro-pulse mode over the macular area including the fovea
applying 810-nm infra-red diode laser in a micro-pulse mode over the macular area including the fovea
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- bilateral diabetic macular edema
- center involving confirmed by Optical coherence tomogram (OCT)
You may not qualify if:
- any non-diabetic macular edema
- significant media opacities
- previous laser treatment, any intraocular surgery within the past 6 months
- previous intravitreal injections of any drug within the past 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University
Cairo, 11562, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Vujosevic S, Martini F, Longhin E, Convento E, Cavarzeran F, Midena E. SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE YELLOW LASER VERSUS SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE INFRARED LASER IN CENTER-INVOLVING DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: Morphologic and Functional Safety. Retina. 2015 Aug;35(8):1594-603. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000521.
PMID: 25719988BACKGROUNDScholz P, Altay L, Fauser S. A Review of Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Treatment of Macular Disorders. Adv Ther. 2017 Jul;34(7):1528-1555. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0559-y. Epub 2017 May 24.
PMID: 28540655BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ahmed Abdelbaki
- Organization
- faculty of medicine, Cairo University
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hany S Hamza, MD
Cairo University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of ophthalmology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2020
First Posted
April 24, 2020
Study Start
January 22, 2018
Primary Completion
September 25, 2018
Study Completion
September 25, 2018
Last Updated
June 1, 2020
Results First Posted
June 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- starting 6 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- Individual participant data (IPD) can be shared with researchers who are planning to conduct a similar study. Requests can be sent to the central contacts by email