Conversational Hypnosis for Peripherical Veinous Access (HYPNACESS)
HYPNACESS
Analgesia Assessment of Conversational Hypnosis Script During Peripherical Veinous Catheter Set up Versus Standard Script in Operating Room
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The peripherical veinous catheterization is required for anesthesia. However, it's a painful procedure and causes stress or even phobia. Hypnosis can be seen as an interesting tool. Conversational hypnosis needs no training. It is used by script, which makes it easier. The working hypothesis for study is that the conversational hypnosia script reduces pain during the set up of peripherical veinous access. The main objective is the analgesia assessment of conversational hypnosis script for peripherical veinous catheter set up versus standard script in operating room. A nurse anesthetist is reading the conversational script or standard script during the procedure. The nurse anesthetist is untrained for hypnosis. The secondary objective are the level of anxiety, patient satisfaction within the perioperative period (EVAN G questionnaire), the heart rate and the evaluation how nurse anesthetist feels about using the script after each use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 18, 2021
CompletedApril 22, 2020
April 1, 2020
8 months
April 16, 2020
April 21, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Analgesia assessment by digital pain scale
Digital pain scale: it describes the severity of the pain On this scale, "0" represents "no pain" and "10" represents "the worst possible pain"
immediately after applying the peripherical veinous catheter dressing
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Level of anxiety by numerical scale
before randomization and immediately after peripherical veinous catheter set up
patient satisfaction within the perioperative period (EVAN G questionnaire)
between 4 and 48 hours after the procedure
Heart rate
during the procedure
Nurse anesthetist feeling about using the script after each use by digital scale
immediately after procedure
Study Arms (2)
Conversational hypnosis script
EXPERIMENTALPatient who received conversational hypnosis script during peripherical veinous access set up
Standard script
OTHERPatient who received standard script during peripherical veinous access set up
Interventions
Conversational hypnosis during peripherical veinous catheter set up
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Digestive endoscopy procedure under general anesthesia in one of the participating centers
- Patient speaking and understanding French
- Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme
- Patient who received enlightened information about the study and who co-signed, with the investigator, a consent to participate after a minimum period of reflection
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with deafness
- Patient with cognitive impairment
- Pregnant and / or breastfeeding patient
- Patient with dissociative disorders (contraindication to hypnosis)
- Patient suffering from a pathology which can cause chronic pain
- Patient receiving analgesia or anxiety drug
- Patient under justice, curatorship or tutorship
- Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire
Nancy, 54000, France
Related Publications (4)
Armstrong P, Young C, McKeown D. Ethyl chloride and venepuncture pain: a comparison with intradermal lidocaine. Can J Anaesth. 1990 Sep;37(6):656-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03006485.
PMID: 2208537BACKGROUNDNir Y, Paz A, Sabo E, Potasman I. Fear of injections in young adults: prevalence and associations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Mar;68(3):341-4.
PMID: 12685642BACKGROUNDFerreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005.
PMID: 21856077BACKGROUNDAuquier P, Pernoud N, Bruder N, Simeoni MC, Auffray JP, Colavolpe C, Francois G, Gouin F, Manelli JC, Martin C, Sapin C, Blache JL. Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jun;102(6):1116-23. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200506000-00010.
PMID: 15915023BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hervé Bouaziz, Pr
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2020
First Posted
April 22, 2020
Study Start
May 4, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2020
Study Completion
January 18, 2021
Last Updated
April 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share