Lateral Sagittal vs Costoclavicular Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block
Lateral Sagittal Versus Costoclavicular Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Comparison of Block Dynamics and Patient Comfort
1 other identifier
interventional
109
1 country
1
Brief Summary
An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block performed with the costoclavicular (CC) approach and the lateral sagittal (LS) approach will be compared in patients scheduled for forearm and hand surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 20, 2020
CompletedOctober 26, 2020
October 1, 2020
5 months
April 19, 2020
October 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Performance time of the operator
Time elapsed from when the needle enters the skin after an optimal view is obtained on ultrasound until the block needle exits the skin after the procedure is completed.
During the block procedure
Duration of start of motor block
Time from when a Lovett score of 5 is seen in at least 1 of 3 cords in the patient extremity on which the operation is being performed, following local anesthetic injection. Lovett rating scale: 6 = normal muscle strength, 5 = slightly decreased muscle strength, 4 = significantly decreased muscle strength, 3 = slight loss of movement, 2 = significant loss of movement, 1 = near total loss of movement, and 0 = total paralysis. Motor block cord myotomes will be evaluated as medial cord (thumb adduction = ulnar nerve), lateral cord (elbow flexion = mucocutaneous nerve), and posterior cord (wrist extension = radial nerve).
45 minutes after the block procedure
Start time of the nervous block
Time from the local injection to when a pin-prick test yields no response in at least 1 of 3 cords in the extremity on which the operation is being performed.
45 minutes after the block procedure
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Time of sensory block
Postoperative Day 1
Time of motor block
Postoperative Day 1
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative Day 1
Surgeon Satisfaction
Postoperative Day 1
Number of needle redirections
During the block procedure
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group LS
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided infraclavicular block - lateral sagittal approach (20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine)
Group CC
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided infraclavicular block - costoclavicular approach (20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine)
Interventions
The US probe will be located medial to the coracoid process in the sagittal plane in the infraclavicular region, and then three cords of the brachial plexus will be viewed. Using the in-plane technique, bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered around the posterior cord (7ml), lateral cord (7ml), and medial cord (6ml).
The US probe will be placed parallel to the clavicle in the midclavicular area and tilted toward the cephalad and the axillary artery, and three cords will be viewed. A needle will be forwarded from lateral to medial with the in-plane technique, and 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered at the center of the three cords.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years to 65 years
- Patients scheduled for elective forearm and hand surgeries
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-3
You may not qualify if:
- Patients not consenting/unwilling to participate
- Age \<18 years or \>65 years
- Patients with ASA 4
- Obesity (BMI \>30 kg/m2)
- Regional anesthesia contraindicated (thrombocytopenia, infection at injection site)
- Severe renal, cardiac, or hepatic disease
- History of hypersensitivity or allergy to local anesthetics
- History of opioid or steroid use for more than 4 weeks
- History of psychiatric disorders
- Analgesic treatment in the last 48 hours preoperatively
- Operations lasting less than 60 minutes and more than 180 minutes
- Patients who converted to general anesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ondokuz Mayis University
Samsun, Atakum, 55139, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Leurcharusmee P, Elgueta MF, Tiyaprasertkul W, Sotthisopha T, Samerchua A, Gordon A, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQH. A randomized comparison between costoclavicular and paracoracoid ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):617-625. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0842-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
PMID: 28205117BACKGROUNDSongthamwat B, Karmakar MK, Li JW, Samy W, Mok LYH. Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Lateral Sagittal and Costoclavicular Approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):825-831. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000822.
PMID: 29923950BACKGROUNDKavrut Ozturk N, Kavakli AS. Comparison of the coracoid and retroclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):572-578. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2359-6. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
PMID: 28421316BACKGROUNDOh C, Noh C, Eom H, Lee S, Park S, Lee S, Shin YS, Ko Y, Chung W, Hong B. Costoclavicular brachial plexus block reduces hemidiaphragmatic paralysis more than supraclavicular brachial plexus block: retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study. Korean J Pain. 2020 Apr 1;33(2):144-152. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.144.
PMID: 32235015BACKGROUNDLayera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, Fernandez D, Garcia A, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Single- versus double-injection costoclavicular block: a randomized comparison. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Mar;45(3):209-213. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101167. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
PMID: 31941792BACKGROUNDMistry T, Balavenkatasubhramanian J, Natarajan V, Kuppusamy E. Ultrasound-guided bilateral costoclavicular brachial plexus blocks for single-stage bilateral upper limb surgeries: Abstain or indulge. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct-Dec;35(4):556-557. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_222_18. No abstract available.
PMID: 31920246BACKGROUNDMonzo E, Hadzic A. Costoclavicular approach to the brachial plexus block: simple or double injection? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Sep 29:rapm-2019-100852. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100852. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.
PMID: 31570494BACKGROUNDSilva GR, Borges DG, Lopes IF, Ruzi RA, Costa PRRM, Mandim BLDS. [Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block as an alternative for upper limb anesthesia in obese patients]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Sep-Oct;69(5):510-513. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
PMID: 31519300BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
BURHAN DOST
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2020
First Posted
April 22, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2020
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 20, 2020
Last Updated
October 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10