NCT04355182|Completed
Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Study Start
February 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 12, 2020
Actual (reported)The aim of this study is to evaluate the posterior condylar angle of the distal femur in Turkish population and its concordance with the current standard prosthesis designs used in total knee arthroplasty and to evaluate anthropometric features of the distal femur in the Turkish population.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
April 12, 2020
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
February 1, 2020
Actual (reported)March 30, 2020
Actual (reported)April 12, 2020
Actual (reported)April 17, 2020
Actual (reported)April 21, 2020
Actual (reported)condylar twist angle and posterior condylar angle
The condylar twist angle (CTA) is an angle between anatomical transepicondylar axis (TEA),which lying from medial epicondyle to lateral epicondyle of the distal femur, and posterior condylar axis (PCAx). The posterior condylar angle (PCA) is an angle between surgical TEA, which lying from medial epicondylar sulcus to lateral epicondyle, and PCAx\[1\].
about 5 days
mediolateral lenght of the distal femur (fML)
about 5 days
medial anteroposterior lengt (fMAP) and lateral anteroposterior lengt (fLAP)
about 5 days
Distance between trochlear groove and fMAP (DBTG-fMAP) and distance between trochlear groove and lateral fAP(DBTG- fLAP)
about 5 days
Medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage thicknesses (MPCCT/LPCCT)
about 5 day
Healty subjects with Turkish ethnic orijin
Bezmialem Vakıf University
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
Loures FB, Furtado Neto S, Pinto Rde L, Kinder A, Labronici PJ, Goes RF, Marchiori E. Rotational assessment of distal femur and its relevance in total knee arthroplasty: analysis by magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol Bras. 2015 Sep-Oct;48(5):282-6. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0037.
Kim TK, Phillips M, Bhandari M, Watson J, Malhotra R. Erratum to: What Differences in Morphologic Features of the Knee Exist Among Patients of Various Races? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1507. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5301-1. No abstract available.
Nurdan Güngören
Bezmialem Vakif University
120 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
April 17, 2020
First Posted
April 21, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Upper Extremity Kinematics During Walking
Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses of Low-Carbohydrate Snack Foods
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 12, 2020
Actual (reported)Last Updated
April 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: