Impact of Robotic Approach Compared to VATS and Open Approach on Quality of Life in Patients With Lung Cancer
QoL
Impact of Minimally Invasive Robotic Approach Compared to VATS and Open Approach on Quality of Life and Immune Response in Patients Candidated to Lobectomy or Anatomical Segmentectomy
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to compare quality of life and early and late post-operative pain after anatomical lung resection (lobectomy or segmentectomy) performed by a robotic approach compared to the videothoracoscopic approach (VATS) and the thoracotomic approach antero-lateral in patients with early stage lung cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedApril 20, 2020
April 1, 2020
4.7 years
April 14, 2020
April 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of quality of life by EORTC QOL-CC30.
The sample size is calculated on the primary end point which is the prospective evaluation of quality of life (QoL) evolution after robotic-assisted thoracoscopic resection versus videothoracoscopic resection versus open thoracotomy, with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire-C30 and the lung cancer-specific module, LC-13. 51 patients operated in each group will provide 80% power to detect a 8-point difference in mean QLQ-C30 "Pain score" between any two study groups, at the 5% level of significance assuming a coefficient of variability of 0.5 and using a two-sided two-sample t-test. The scale parameters range are included from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Evaluation of postoperative pain by daily evaluation with visual numeric scale before and after surgery until discharge and at 1, 6 and 12 months
01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020
Intraoperative complications
01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020
Postoperative complications
01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020
Disease free survival at 24 months
01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020
Study Arms (3)
Patients operated with an open approach
Patients operated with minimally invasive robotic approach
Patients operated with VATS approach
Eligibility Criteria
The study population should have the following Inclusion criteria: - known or suspected lung cancer clinical stage T1-T2, N0-N1 candidates for surgery lobectomy or anatomical segmentectomy; - ASA-1-2-3; - not severe heart disease; -no alcohol; -no renal impairment (creatinine \<2); -not obese (BMI \<30); no evidence of other serious comorbidities in the opinion of the investigator.
You may qualify if:
- known or suspected lung cancer clinical stage T1-T2;
- N0-N1 candidates for surgery lobectomy or anatomical segmentectomy;
- ASA-1-2-3;
- not severe heart disease;
- no alcohol;
- no renal impairment (creatinine \<2);
- not obese (BMI \<30);
- no evidence of other serious comorbidities in the opinion of the investigator.
You may not qualify if:
- severe heart disease;
- renal impairment (creatinine \>2.5);
- evidence of any serious comorbidities according to the investigator;
- malignant tumor in the previous 2 years;
- previous chest surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2020
First Posted
April 20, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04