Analgesic Efficacy After Pancreatobiliary Surgery: Intravenous Versus Patient-controlled Epidural
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy After Major Surgery in Pancreatobiliary Cancers: Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia Versus Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prospective, single institute based, open label, double arm, randomized controlled trial Hypothesis: Pain control after resection of hepatobiliary tumors in patients with PCEA is more effective than in patients with IV-PCA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 pancreatic-cancer
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 pancreatic-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedApril 17, 2020
April 1, 2020
2.3 years
April 2, 2020
April 15, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of analgesic efficacy after major surgery in pancreatobiliary cancers: Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia
Comparison of pain scale (Numeric rating scale; minimum: 0, maximum: 10) of IV PCA and PCEA during ambulation on the day 2 postoperatively; Scale 0 means no pain and scale 10 means most painful
Day 2 postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Investigation and comparison of pain and clinical progress during rest after surgery, side effects of drugs administered to IV-PCA and PCEA, and complications related to PCEA procedure
7 days
Study Arms (2)
A (IV-PCA group)
EXPERIMENTALIV-PCA drug: Fentanyl 3000 mcg and Oxycodone 100 mg were mixed Normal saline 200 ml
B (PCEA group)
EXPERIMENTALPCEA drug: Morphine 5 mg and Ropivacaine 750 mg were mixed Normal saline 400 ml loading of preadministered Morphine 1 mg and Ropivacaine 11.25 mg
Interventions
Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia Patient-controlled epidural analgesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pancreatobiliary malignancies
- Anticipating open surgery
- Written concent
You may not qualify if:
- History of previous upper abdominal open surgery
- Psychiatric problems
- Cognitive impairment
- Chronic pain
- Elimination Criteria
- Rejected written concent
- Failure to follow instructions of doctor
- Stopped surgery due to peritoneal metastasis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cancer Center
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- 2, 4, 6 block randomization
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2020
First Posted
April 17, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 30, 2020
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
April 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 3 years from the study completion date