NCT04349787

Brief Summary

Primary, this study aims to develop and validate a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system for the characterization of colorectal polyps. Second, this study evaluates the effect of using a clinical classification model Blue Light Imaging Adenoma Serrated International (BASIC) on the diagnostic accuracy of the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps compared to intuitive optical diagnosis for both expert endoscopists and novices.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 26, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 8, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 8, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 9, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 16, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 16, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

April 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial intelligenceComputer-aided diagnosisOptical diagnosisColorectal polypsBlue light imaging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic accuracy of CADx versus endoscopists

    The diagnostic accuracy of characterizing colorectal polyps (into benign versus (pre-)malignant) made by CADx in comparison to the diagnostic accuracy of both expert endoscopists and novices. In which histology is the gold standard.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Diagnostic accuracy of BASIC versus intuition

    6 months

  • Diagnostic metrics of CADx

    6 months

  • AUC of CADx

    6 months

  • Diagnostic metrics of endoscopists

    6 months

  • Diagnostic metrics of endoscopists for high confidence diagnosis

    6 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Colorectal polyp patients

Patients who have a colonoscopy in regular care as part of the Dutch colorectal screening program, in the context of complaints or in the context of the follow-up of previously diagnosed bowel diseases. And who have at least one colorectal polyp found and resected during the examination.

Other: Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx)Other: BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification (BASIC)

Interventions

Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps made with computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) using state-of-the-art machine learning methods and deep learning architectures.

Colorectal polyp patients

Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps made with BLI Adenoma Serrated International Classification (BASIC), both by exert endoscopists and novices.

Colorectal polyp patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients who had a colonoscopy in the Catharina hospital Eindhoven between January 2017 and December 2018 in the context of the regular bowel cancer screening program, in the context of complaints or in the context of the follow-up of previously diagnosed bowel diseases.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with at least one colorectal polyp found and resected during colonoscopy in regular care;
  • Availability of at least one high definition white light image and one Blue Light Imaging (BLI) image of the colorectal polyp;
  • Overall high quality of the colorectal polyp image;
  • Availability of the histological results of the colorectal polyp;
  • Minimal age of 18 years old.

You may not qualify if:

  • Objection to participate in medical scientific research, reported in the medical file;
  • Endoscopic instruments visible at the colorectal polyp image;
  • More than one polyp visible at the colorectal polyp image.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Maastricht University Medical Center

Maastricht, Limburg, 6202AZ, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • ASGE Technology Committee; Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, Chauhan SS, Hwang JH, Komanduri S, Manfredi M, Maple JT, Murad FM, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

    PMID: 25597420BACKGROUND
  • Subramaniam S, Hayee B, Aepli P, Schoon E, Stefanovic M, Kandiah K, Thayalasekaran S, Alkandari A, Bassett P, Coron E, Pech O, Hassan C, Neumann H, Bisschops R, Repici A, Bhandari P. Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps with Blue Light Imaging using a new international classification. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Mar;7(2):316-325. doi: 10.1177/2050640618822402. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

    PMID: 31080616BACKGROUND
  • Byrne MF, Chapados N, Soudan F, Oertel C, Linares Perez M, Kelly R, Iqbal N, Chandelier F, Rex DK. Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model. Gut. 2019 Jan;68(1):94-100. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

    PMID: 29066576BACKGROUND
  • van der Zander QEW, Schreuder RM, Fonolla R, Scheeve T, van der Sommen F, Winkens B, Aepli P, Hayee B, Pischel AB, Stefanovic M, Subramaniam S, Bhandari P, de With PHN, Masclee AAM, Schoon EJ. Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyp images using a newly developed computer-aided diagnosis system (CADx) compared with intuitive optical diagnosis. Endoscopy. 2021 Dec;53(12):1219-1226. doi: 10.1055/a-1343-1597. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Colorectal polyps are resected for histological evaluation. This specimen is resected because of regular care, not for study purposes.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Interventions

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnosis

Study Officials

  • Ad Masclee, Prof. Dr.

    Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2020

First Posted

April 16, 2020

Study Start

November 26, 2019

Primary Completion

March 8, 2020

Study Completion

March 8, 2020

Last Updated

April 16, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

At this moment, there is no plan to share individual participant data.

Locations