Comparison of Dry Needling and Activator Trigger Point Therapy on Upper Trapezius Trigger Points.
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Dry needling and Activator trigger point therapy on upper trapezius trigger points.Randomized controlled trial was conducted on Sixty-eight patients with active upper trapezius trigger points meeting the inclusion criteria i.e Age limit 20-45 both genders, presence of unilateral or bilateral upper trapezius Trigger Points. For bilateral presence of trigger points, the more painful side was selected. If more than one trigger points were present on the side to be treated, most painful trigger point was treated. Patients fulfilling essential criteria to identify the trigger points. According to Simon's criteria, which included a palpable taut band that was detected with palpation, the presence of a sensitive nodule in the taut band which was determined with algometry and referral pain. Exclusion criteria was specific neck pain, e.g. radiculopathy, systemic or inflammatory pain., evidence of spinal cord compression, recent neck surgery or trauma, long-term use of corticosteroids, anticoagulant use, e.g. Warfarin, presence of a blood coagulation disorder, contraindication for needling such as local infection, pregnancy with threatened abortion. Participants were selected by purposive sampling, group randomization using lottery method technique. All the participants were assessed using Numeric pain rating scale to measure pain, algometer to measure pain pressure threshold and inclinometer to measure cervical lateral flexion range of motion. A demographic form was used to collect data from patients. Patients were randomly assigned in dry needling and activator therapy group. Treatment was given at a frequency of 2 sessions per week and total 6 sessions were given to both group during a course of 3 weeks. The data was analyzed using SPSS 21.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2020
CompletedApril 15, 2020
April 1, 2020
4 months
March 6, 2020
April 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)
The NPRS was used to measure the pain intensity of myofasial trigger points of the upper trapezius muscle . NPRS is a valid and reliable tool to assess pain. It consists of 10cm long line scale on which patient reports his/her pain from 0 (no pain) to (10 (worst possible pain)
for three weeks
Inclinometer
PAOMPT Bubble inclinometer was used in our study. Patient was educated abot the procedure. Inclinometer was placed on patients head. Cervical lateral flexion was recorded by stabilizing the shoulder of the patient and asking him/her to bring his/her ear towards the shoulder. Reading was recorded by the tilt of fluid inside the inclinometer.
for three weeks
Algometer
The pain pressre threshold was taken by applying vertical pressure over selected trigger point by a sixty pound baseline algometer. Pressure was increased at the rate of 1kg/cm until the patient reported the pain by saying 'yes'. 3 readings were taken at the interval of ten seconds and mean was considered as the selected measurement
for three weeks
Study Arms (2)
activator trigger point therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe Activator adjusting instrument used had force settings ranging from 1 to 6 . For this study a force setting of 3 was used.
Trigger point dry needling
ACTIVE COMPARATORFirst, a tight band was held between the index finger and the thumb of the non-dominant hand and the needle (0.25-40 mm - Shen Long) was perpendicularly inserted into the muscle with the dominant hand.
Interventions
activator instrument was placed perpendicular over the identified trigger point and 10 thrusts were delivered, with a rate of one thrust per second
By wrist flexion and extension movements, the trigger point was needled in different directions and tried to elicit at least one local twitch response during the procedure and patient's familiar referral pain was tried to obtain . Each dry needling procedure lasted 1-2 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age limit 20-45
- male and female .
- Presence of unilateral or bilateral upper trapezius Trigger Points.
- Patients identified with presence of trigger points.
You may not qualify if:
- Specific neck pain,
- Evidence of spinal cord compression
- Recent neck surgery or trauma.
- Long-term use of corticosteroids. Anticoagulant use, e.g. Warfarin. Presence of a blood coagulation disorder. Contraindication for needling such as local infection, pregnancy with threatened abortion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Medical Rehabilitation
Islamabad, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan
Related Publications (8)
Ziaeifar M, Arab AM, Karimi N, Nourbakhsh MR. The effect of dry needling on pain, pressure pain threshold and disability in patients with a myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Apr;18(2):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
PMID: 24725800BACKGROUNDCagnie B, Castelein B, Pollie F, Steelant L, Verhoeyen H, Cools A. Evidence for the Use of Ischemic Compression and Dry Needling in the Management of Trigger Points of the Upper Trapezius in Patients with Neck Pain: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jul;94(7):573-83. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000266.
PMID: 25768071BACKGROUNDRamsey FE, Tomlanovich MC, Nowak RM. Cricothyrotomy instrumentation. JACEP. 1978 Sep;7(9):345-6. doi: 10.1016/s0361-1124(78)80362-1. No abstract available.
PMID: 45708BACKGROUNDShah JP, Thaker N, Heimur J, Aredo JV, Sikdar S, Gerber L. Myofascial Trigger Points Then and Now: A Historical and Scientific Perspective. PM R. 2015 Jul;7(7):746-761. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.01.024. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
PMID: 25724849BACKGROUNDYeganeh Lari A, Okhovatian F, Naimi Ss, Baghban AA. The effect of the combination of dry needling and MET on latent trigger point upper trapezius in females. Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
PMID: 26304789BACKGROUNDDunning J, Butts R, Mourad F, Young I, Flannagan S, Perreault T. Dry needling: a literature review with implications for clinical practice guidelines. Phys Ther Rev. 2014 Aug;19(4):252-265. doi: 10.1179/108331913X13844245102034.
PMID: 25143704BACKGROUNDLiu L, Huang QM, Liu QG, Ye G, Bo CZ, Chen MJ, Li P. Effectiveness of dry needling for myofascial trigger points associated with neck and shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):944-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.015. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
PMID: 25576642BACKGROUNDJensen EV, Block GE, Ferguson DJ, DeSombre ER. Estrogen receptors in breast cancer. World J Surg. 1977 May;1(3):341-2. doi: 10.1007/BF01556853. No abstract available.
PMID: 883334BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria Khalid, MSOMPT
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2020
First Posted
April 15, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2019
Primary Completion
November 1, 2019
Study Completion
February 20, 2020
Last Updated
April 15, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share