NCT04341714

Brief Summary

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated drastic measures in order to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The stay home policies for the whole population and especially for frail patients and the express instruction to deprogram non-urgent consultations and interventions limited the clinic visits in neuro-urology department. In this context, telemedicine was seen as a pragmatic solution to provide follow-up care for our neurologic patients. Due to the delay in deploying telemedicine and the cognitive impairment of some of our patients, telephone consultation has been prioritized. The COVID-19 pandemic might be an opportunity to review and refine our practices in neuro-urology. For the follow-up of selected patients, telephone consultations may be efficient and cost effective. The aim of the study is to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction with telephone consultation for the physician and the patient. The study was conducted in a neuro-urology department of a university hospital in France. During the stay-home policies for the COVID-19 pandemic, all the scheduled medical visits were converted into telephone consultation. New patients weren't included. For each teleconsultation, the physician assess the duration of the consultation, the number of tries to join the patient, the efficiency of the consultation, the difficulty to obtain relevant information due to the phone way of the consultation and the lack of physical examination. On the next days, the patient was contacted by phone and was asked a) if he was satisfied of being phoned by the physician, b) if the teleconsultation was embarrassing, c) if he had enough time of teleconsultation d) if he got all the answers to his queries, e) if he would preferred to had a physical consultation f) to assessed the global satisfaction of the teleconsultation and g) if in the future, they may considered converting some clinic visits to teleconsultations. The physician and the patient assessed whether this teleconsultation has replaced a physical visit. The usual transport mode of the patient for a clinic visit and the need to take a day off for worker patients were recorded. The primary aim was to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction of the telephone consultation. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the efficiency of the telephone consultation by the physician on a numerical 10-points scale. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of the satisfaction of the telephone consultation by the patient on a numerical 10-points scale. Four hundred teleconsultations are scheduled for five physicians.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
450

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 16, 2020

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 8, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 10, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2020

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 15, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

April 8, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

telemedicineneurourologyefficacysatisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficiency of the telephone consultation

    The primary outcome was the evaluation of the efficiency of the telephone consultation by the physician on the numeric scale with 0 the worth efficiency and 10 the best efficiency.

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Satisfaction of the telephone consultation

    1 day

Study Arms (1)

patients enrolled

Patients with telephone consultation on neurourology department, age \> 18

Other: Satisfaction evaluation

Interventions

Assessement of satisfaction of the telephone consultation

patients enrolled

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with telephone consultation in a tertiary center in neuro-urology

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Telephone consultation

You may not qualify if:

  • New patient in the department

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Neuro- Urology, Hôpital Tenon

Paris, 75020, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient SatisfactionPersonal Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Gérard Amarenco, PhD

    Sorbonne Université, GRC 001, GREEN Groupe de Recherche en Neuro-Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, F-75020, Paris, France

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PHD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2020

First Posted

April 10, 2020

Study Start

March 16, 2020

Primary Completion

May 30, 2020

Study Completion

June 15, 2020

Last Updated

June 15, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Locations