Efficiency and Satisfaction With Telephone Consultation in Neuro-urology: Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic
1 other identifier
observational
450
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated drastic measures in order to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The stay home policies for the whole population and especially for frail patients and the express instruction to deprogram non-urgent consultations and interventions limited the clinic visits in neuro-urology department. In this context, telemedicine was seen as a pragmatic solution to provide follow-up care for our neurologic patients. Due to the delay in deploying telemedicine and the cognitive impairment of some of our patients, telephone consultation has been prioritized. The COVID-19 pandemic might be an opportunity to review and refine our practices in neuro-urology. For the follow-up of selected patients, telephone consultations may be efficient and cost effective. The aim of the study is to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction with telephone consultation for the physician and the patient. The study was conducted in a neuro-urology department of a university hospital in France. During the stay-home policies for the COVID-19 pandemic, all the scheduled medical visits were converted into telephone consultation. New patients weren't included. For each teleconsultation, the physician assess the duration of the consultation, the number of tries to join the patient, the efficiency of the consultation, the difficulty to obtain relevant information due to the phone way of the consultation and the lack of physical examination. On the next days, the patient was contacted by phone and was asked a) if he was satisfied of being phoned by the physician, b) if the teleconsultation was embarrassing, c) if he had enough time of teleconsultation d) if he got all the answers to his queries, e) if he would preferred to had a physical consultation f) to assessed the global satisfaction of the teleconsultation and g) if in the future, they may considered converting some clinic visits to teleconsultations. The physician and the patient assessed whether this teleconsultation has replaced a physical visit. The usual transport mode of the patient for a clinic visit and the need to take a day off for worker patients were recorded. The primary aim was to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction of the telephone consultation. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the efficiency of the telephone consultation by the physician on a numerical 10-points scale. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of the satisfaction of the telephone consultation by the patient on a numerical 10-points scale. Four hundred teleconsultations are scheduled for five physicians.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2020
CompletedJune 15, 2021
June 1, 2021
3 months
April 8, 2020
June 14, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficiency of the telephone consultation
The primary outcome was the evaluation of the efficiency of the telephone consultation by the physician on the numeric scale with 0 the worth efficiency and 10 the best efficiency.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction of the telephone consultation
1 day
Study Arms (1)
patients enrolled
Patients with telephone consultation on neurourology department, age \> 18
Interventions
Assessement of satisfaction of the telephone consultation
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with telephone consultation in a tertiary center in neuro-urology
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Telephone consultation
You may not qualify if:
- New patient in the department
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Neuro- Urology, Hôpital Tenon
Paris, 75020, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gérard Amarenco, PhD
Sorbonne Université, GRC 001, GREEN Groupe de Recherche en Neuro-Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, F-75020, Paris, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PHD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2020
First Posted
April 10, 2020
Study Start
March 16, 2020
Primary Completion
May 30, 2020
Study Completion
June 15, 2020
Last Updated
June 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06