New-DES vs BMS in SVG -1 Year Outcomes
BALTIC
New-generation Drug Eluting Stent vs. Bare Metal Stent in Saphenous Vein Graft - 1 Year Outcomes by a Propensity Score Ascertainment (SVG Baltic Registry)
1 other identifier
observational
792
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Data regarding the efficacy of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-designed drug-eluting stent (new-DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) stenosis is scarce. The primary objective was to compare one-year clinical outcomes of PCI in stenosis of SVG using new-DES vs. BMS in a real-world population. We carried out a multi-center registry comparing new-DES with BMS in all consecutive patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The primary composite endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2008
Longer than P75 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2020
CompletedApril 8, 2020
April 1, 2020
7.7 years
April 4, 2020
April 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
death
1 year
myocardial infarction
1 year
target vessel revascularization
1 year
target lesion revascularization
1 year
stroke
1 year
Study Arms (1)
SVG PCI
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
All consecutive patients undergoing PCI of SVG
You may qualify if:
- patients after CABG with significant SVG stenosis referred for PCI
You may not qualify if:
- patients who had both types of stents implanted in the same procedure
- patients with the old-DES
- patients who had PCI of other vascular territories during the same procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical University of Silesialead
- Wojciech Wojakowskicollaborator
Study Sites (3)
First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
Gdansk, Poland
Department of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
Katowice, 40-635, Poland
Second Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
Krakow, Poland
Related Publications (1)
Wanha W, Mielczarek M, Roleder T, Ladzinski S, Milewski M, Gilis-Malinowska N, Chmielecki M, Ciecwierz D, Bachorski W, Kunik P, Trznadel A, Mecka K, Genc A, Januszek R, Paczek P, Dziewierz A, Bartus S, Gruchala M, Smolka G, Dudek D, Navarese EP, Ochala A, Jaguszewski M, Wojakowski W. New-generation drug eluting stent vs. bare metal stent in saphenous vein graft - 1 year outcomes by a propensity score ascertainment (SVG Baltic Registry). Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;292:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
PMID: 31003797BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2020
First Posted
April 8, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04