Veracity Surgical: A Time/Motion and Quality of Care Study
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the time required for surgical planning using these two methods and to explore whether differences in surgical accuracy can be identified in a small study of 40 patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Apr 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2020
CompletedJuly 16, 2021
April 1, 2020
7 months
April 6, 2020
July 15, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average number of minutes:seconds to plan surgery for a single eye
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
By each method the number of total data points where a human is required manually to transcribe data from one place to another.
1 day
Other Outcomes (1)
Exploratory Endpoint: By each method the % of patients within 0.5 D of the intended postoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction
1 day
Interventions
The current standard of care for surgical planning for the participating investigator surgeon is to use Zeiss Veracity Surgical, so this same method will be used for the surgery actually performed on participating patients.
Eligibility Criteria
The study aims to enroll 40 patients undergoing future cataract surgery.
You may qualify if:
- Patients at least 18 years of age with upcoming cataract surgery. At least 25% of enrolled eyes must be post-refractive, and 25% must require astigmatic planning (arcuate incision or toric IOL)
- Patients with otherwise healthy eyes, not exhibiting any significant ocular morbidity that would be expected to influence refractive outcome or interfere with postoperative refraction accuracy.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with visually significant comorbidities (corneal, retina, optic nerve disease, not including prior refractive surgery) that could significantly affect their ability to have accurate preoperative biometry or postoperative refraction.
- Patients with surgical complications either during or after surgery (capsule tears, iris trauma, decentered IOL, cystoid macular edema, etc.) that would interfere with postoperative refraction.
- Patients with \> grade 2 or greater posterior capsule opacity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Harvard Eye Associates
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
John Hovanesian, MD
Research Insight LLC
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2020
First Posted
April 8, 2020
Study Start
April 20, 2020
Primary Completion
November 16, 2020
Study Completion
November 16, 2020
Last Updated
July 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share