Effects of Physical Therapy on Isometric Neck Retraction Strength and Pain in Patients With Neck Disability
1 other identifier
observational
25
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Impaired neck muscle strength is related to neck pain, abnormal posture, and various cervical pathologies. Clinicians, therefore require objective, reliable and valid methods for quantifying neck strength. In a previous study, the investigators developed a novel, valid, and reliable method for measuring neck retraction strength, using a handheld dynamometer (HHD), in normal, healthy individuals. The investigators are now expanding this research to study a patient population. Specifically, to describe isometric neck retraction strength in patients with neck pain and to study the effects of physical therapy (PT) on that strength. Our hypothesis is that isometric cervical retraction strength will increase over the course of treatment and that there will be an inverse relationship between strength and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2020
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 23, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 23, 2021
CompletedMay 2, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.6 years
April 1, 2020
April 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Neck Retraction Strength
Change in isometric Neck Retraction Strength measured with a Hoggan MicroFET2 hand-held dynamometer in kilograms at baseline, approximately every 30 days during the physical therapy intervention and immediately after the physical therapy intervention at discharge. The estimated period of time from baseline until completion is 3 months.
At baseline (the initial evaluation) and every 30 days thereafter until discharge from PT. The estimated period of time from baseline until completion is 3 months.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Neck Pain: Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
At baseline (the initial evaluation) and every 30 days thereafter until discharge from PT. The estimated time frame from baseline until completion is 3 months.
Function
At baseline (the initial evaluation) and every 30 days thereafter until discharge from PT. The estimated time frame from baseline until completion is 3 months.
Study Arms (4)
Clinic 1
Clinics will be identified using Clinic numbers: Clinic 1, Clinic 2, Clinic 3, Clinic 4. The interventions will be normal physical therapy interventions. The only addition is the monitoring of isometric neck retraction strength at the initial evaluation, progress reports, and discharge. The purpose of the study is not to administer new or specific interventions but to monitor neck strength changes over time during regular physical therapy care.
Clinic 2
Clinics will be identified using Clinic numbers: Clinic 1, Clinic 2, Clinic 3, Clinic 4. The interventions will be normal physical therapy interventions. The only addition is the monitoring of isometric neck retraction strength at the initial evaluation, progress reports, and discharge. The purpose of the study is not to administer new or specific interventions but to monitor neck strength changes over time during regular physical therapy care.
Clinic 3
Clinics will be identified using Clinic numbers: Clinic 1, Clinic 2, Clinic 3, Clinic 4. The interventions will be normal physical therapy interventions. The only addition is the monitoring of isometric neck retraction strength at the initial evaluation, progress reports, and discharge. The purpose of the study is not to administer new or specific interventions but to monitor neck strength changes over time during regular physical therapy care.
Clinic 4
Clinics will be identified using Clinic numbers: Clinic 1, Clinic 2, Clinic 3, Clinic 4. The interventions will be normal physical therapy interventions. The only addition is the monitoring of isometric neck retraction strength at the initial evaluation, progress reports, and discharge. The purpose of the study is not to administer new or specific interventions but to monitor neck strength changes over time during regular physical therapy care.
Interventions
Patients with primary complaints of neck pain will receive routine physical therapy care including modalities, manual therapy including neck mobilization and manipulation, stretching and strengthening exercises, and patient education.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults with neck pain receiving physical therapy
You may qualify if:
- \- 18 years of age or older Primary complaints of neck pain and receiving Physical Therapy
You may not qualify if:
- \- History of neck surgery Neurologic diseases Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Integral Physical Therapy
Firestone, Colorado, 80504, United States
Performance PT
Cos Cob, Connecticut, 06807, United States
Connecticut Physical Therapy Specialists
Granby, Connecticut, 06035, United States
Back in Action
Holly Springs, North Carolina, 27540, United States
Related Publications (2)
Tudini F, Myers B, Bohannon R. Reliability and validity of measurements of cervical retraction strength obtained with a hand-held dynamometer. J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Sep;27(4):222-228. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1586167. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30935321RESULTCagnie B, Cools A, De Loose V, Cambier D, Danneels L. Differences in isometric neck muscle strength between healthy controls and women with chronic neck pain: the use of a reliable measurement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov;88(11):1441-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.776.
PMID: 17964885RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frank Tudini, DSc
Campbell University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2020
First Posted
April 6, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion
October 23, 2021
Study Completion
October 23, 2021
Last Updated
May 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04