The Effect of Lumbar CSF Drainage on the Neurologic Outcome Improvement in OHCA Underwent TTM
The Effect of Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on the Neurologic Outcome Improvement in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Underwent Targeted Temperature Management
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage on neurologic outcome in post-cardiac arrest (CA) patients treated with target temperature management (TTM). Methods: This is a prospective single-center study conducted from May 2020 to November 2021 on patients who have been treated with TTM following CA. The propensity score matching is proceeded between the lumbar CSF drainage and non-lumbar CSF drainage groups. The good outcome group is defined as a Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories (CPC) scale 1 or 2, and the poor outcome group as a CPC between 3 and 5. Lumbar CSF drainage is initiated when intracranial pressure (ICP) exceeded 15 mmHg in the absence of noxious stimuli at the rate of 10\~20 ml/h via a lumbar drainage catheter until ICP is less than 15 mmHg. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is obtained between 72-96 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to evaluate the effect of lumbar CSF drainage on attenuation of brain swelling through quantitative analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Multivariate logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier models are built to identify the effect of CSF drainage on the neurologic outcome improvement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2021
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2024
CompletedFebruary 9, 2024
September 1, 2023
1.7 years
March 24, 2020
February 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the effect of the lumbar CSF drainage on the neurologic outcome
The primary endpoint is to mearsure the effect of the lumbar CSF drainage on the neurologic outcome using the Glasgow Pittsburgh cerebral performance category (CPC) scale in post-CA patients treated with TTM.
6 months after ROSC
Secondary Outcomes (1)
the effect of the lumbar CSF drainage on attenuation of brain swelling
72-96 hours after ROSC
Study Arms (1)
the lumbar CSF drainage group
We named the patients treated with the protocol and the lumbar CSF drainage as the lumbar CSF drainage group.
Interventions
We have performed the lumbar CSF drainage on the level of the lumbar spine between L3 and L4 with the patient lying in the lateral decubitus position with hips and knees flexed. A lumbar drainage catheter was inserted using a HermeticTM lumbar accessory kit (Integra Neurosciences, Plainsboro, NJ, USA) in the patients. ICP monitoring via lumbar drainage catheter was practiced using the LiquoGuard® (Möller Medical GmbH \& Co KG, Fulda, Germany). ICP control strategies was initiated when ICP exceeded 15 mmHg in the absence of noxious stimuli at the rate of 10\~20 ml/h via a lumbar drainage catheter until ICP was less than 15 mmHg \[14, 15\].
Eligibility Criteria
A previous study reported ICP on 24 h after ROSC was 189.00 ± 46.02 mmH2O in good outcome and 265.56 ± 72.43 mmH2O in poor outcome, 40 patients were needed to achieve the power of 0.90 at a significance level of 0.01 (two-sided test).
You may qualify if:
- Resuscitated out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients
- OHCA patients whose GCS is 8 or less after ROSC
- OHCA patients who undergo TTM
You may not qualify if:
- \< 18 y of age
- Traumatic CA
- Interrupted TTM due to hemodynamic instability
- Intracranial hemorrhage
- Active bleeding
- Known terminal illness
- Poor pre-arrest neurological status
- Brain computed tomography showed severe cerebral edema
- Brain computed tomography showed obliteration of the basal cisterns
- Brain computed tomography showed occult intracranial mass lesion
- Antiplatelet therapy
- Anticoagulation therapy
- Platelet count \< 40,000/mL
- International normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5
- OHCA patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chungnam National University Hospital
Daejeon, 35015, South Korea
Related Publications (18)
Iida K, Satoh H, Arita K, Nakahara T, Kurisu K, Ohtani M. Delayed hyperemia causing intracranial hypertension after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 1997 Jun;25(6):971-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199706000-00013.
PMID: 9201049BACKGROUNDPolderman KH. Mechanisms of action, physiological effects, and complications of hypothermia. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;37(7 Suppl):S186-202. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181aa5241.
PMID: 19535947BACKGROUNDYou Y, Park J, Min J, Yoo I, Jeong W, Cho Y, Ryu S, Lee J, Kim S, Cho S, Oh S, Lee J, Ahn H, Lee B, Lee D, Na K, In Y, Kwack C, Lee J. Relationship between time related serum albumin concentration, optic nerve sheath diameter, cerebrospinal fluid pressure, and neurological prognosis in cardiac arrest survivors. Resuscitation. 2018 Oct;131:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
PMID: 30086374BACKGROUNDPark JS, You Y, Min JH, Yoo I, Jeong W, Cho Y, Ryu S, Lee J, Kim SW, Cho SU, Oh SK, Ahn HJ, Lee J, Lee IH. Study on the timing of severe blood-brain barrier disruption using cerebrospinal fluid-serum albumin quotient in post cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management. Resuscitation. 2019 Feb;135:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
PMID: 30612965BACKGROUNDCarney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM, Shutter L, Tasker RC, Vavilala MS, Wilberger J, Wright DW, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432.
PMID: 27654000BACKGROUNDCushing H. Some aspects of the pathological physiology of intracranial tumors. Boston Med Surg J 1909; 141:71-80.
BACKGROUNDNash CS. Cerebellar herniation as a cause of death. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1937; 46: 673-80.
BACKGROUNDVERBRUGGHEN A. Spinal puncture. Surg Clin North Am. 1946 Feb:78-90. No abstract available.
PMID: 21015502BACKGROUNDMunch EC, Bauhuf C, Horn P, Roth HR, Schmiedek P, Vajkoczy P. Therapy of malignant intracranial hypertension by controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Crit Care Med. 2001 May;29(5):976-81. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200105000-00016.
PMID: 11378607BACKGROUNDManet R, Payen JF, Guerin R, Martinez O, Hautefeuille S, Francony G, Gergele L. Using external lumbar CSF drainage to treat communicating external hydrocephalus in adult patients after acute traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Oct;159(10):2003-2009. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3290-1. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
PMID: 28791479BACKGROUNDMurad A, Ghostine S, Colohan AR. A case for further investigating the use of controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage for the control of intracranial pressure. World Neurosurg. 2012 Jan;77(1):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
PMID: 22154151BACKGROUNDEngelborghs S, Niemantsverdriet E, Struyfs H, Blennow K, Brouns R, Comabella M, Dujmovic I, van der Flier W, Frolich L, Galimberti D, Gnanapavan S, Hemmer B, Hoff E, Hort J, Iacobaeus E, Ingelsson M, Jan de Jong F, Jonsson M, Khalil M, Kuhle J, Lleo A, de Mendonca A, Molinuevo JL, Nagels G, Paquet C, Parnetti L, Roks G, Rosa-Neto P, Scheltens P, Skarsgard C, Stomrud E, Tumani H, Visser PJ, Wallin A, Winblad B, Zetterberg H, Duits F, Teunissen CE. Consensus guidelines for lumbar puncture in patients with neurological diseases. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 May 18;8:111-126. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.007. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28603768BACKGROUNDSong G, You Y, Jeong W, Lee J, Cho Y, Lee S, Ryu S, Lee J, Kim S, Yoo I. Vasopressor requirement during targeted temperature management for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by acute myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 31;3(1):20-26. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.090. eCollection 2016 Mar.
PMID: 27752611BACKGROUNDNaito H, Isotani E, Callaway CW, Hagioka S, Morimoto N. Intracranial Pressure Increases During Rewarming Period After Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia in Postcardiac Arrest Patients. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2016 Dec;6(4):189-193. doi: 10.1089/ther.2016.0009. Epub 2016 May 23.
PMID: 27213805BACKGROUNDSekhon MS, Griesdale DE, Ainslie PN, Gooderham P, Foster D, Czosnyka M, Robba C, Cardim D. Intracranial pressure and compliance in hypoxic ischemic brain injury patients after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2019 Aug;141:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.036. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
PMID: 31185256BACKGROUNDPark JS, Cho Y, You Y, Min JH, Jeong W, Ahn HJ, Kang C, Yoo I, Ryu S, Lee J, Kim SW, Cho SU, Oh SK, Lee J, Lee IH. Optimal timing to measure optic nerve sheath diameter as a prognostic predictor in post-cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management. Resuscitation. 2019 Oct;143:173-179. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
PMID: 31306717BACKGROUNDLongstreth WT Jr, Nichol G, Van Ottingham L, Hallstrom AP. Two simple questions to assess neurologic outcomes at 3 months after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: experience from the public access defibrillation trial. Resuscitation. 2010 May;81(5):530-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.011. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
PMID: 20172643BACKGROUNDAmeloot K, De Deyne C, Ferdinande B, Dupont M, Palmers PJ, Petit T, Eertmans W, Moonen C, Belmans A, Lemmens R, Dens J, Janssens S. Mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg versus 85-100 mm Hg in comatose survivors after cardiac arrest: Rationale and study design of the Neuroprotect post-cardiac arrest trial. Am Heart J. 2017 Sep;191:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
PMID: 28888275BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yeonho You, professor
Chungnam National University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 6 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2020
First Posted
April 1, 2020
Study Start
July 5, 2021
Primary Completion
April 2, 2023
Study Completion
January 16, 2024
Last Updated
February 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share