NCT04328974

Brief Summary

Aim: The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage on neurologic outcome in post-cardiac arrest (CA) patients treated with target temperature management (TTM). Methods: This is a prospective single-center study conducted from May 2020 to November 2021 on patients who have been treated with TTM following CA. The propensity score matching is proceeded between the lumbar CSF drainage and non-lumbar CSF drainage groups. The good outcome group is defined as a Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories (CPC) scale 1 or 2, and the poor outcome group as a CPC between 3 and 5. Lumbar CSF drainage is initiated when intracranial pressure (ICP) exceeded 15 mmHg in the absence of noxious stimuli at the rate of 10\~20 ml/h via a lumbar drainage catheter until ICP is less than 15 mmHg. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is obtained between 72-96 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to evaluate the effect of lumbar CSF drainage on attenuation of brain swelling through quantitative analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Multivariate logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier models are built to identify the effect of CSF drainage on the neurologic outcome improvement.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2020

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 5, 2021

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 2, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 16, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 9, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

March 24, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 8, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

lumbarintracranial pressure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the effect of the lumbar CSF drainage on the neurologic outcome

    The primary endpoint is to mearsure the effect of the lumbar CSF drainage on the neurologic outcome using the Glasgow Pittsburgh cerebral performance category (CPC) scale in post-CA patients treated with TTM.

    6 months after ROSC

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • the effect of the lumbar CSF drainage on attenuation of brain swelling

    72-96 hours after ROSC

Study Arms (1)

the lumbar CSF drainage group

We named the patients treated with the protocol and the lumbar CSF drainage as the lumbar CSF drainage group.

Procedure: lumbar CSF drainage

Interventions

We have performed the lumbar CSF drainage on the level of the lumbar spine between L3 and L4 with the patient lying in the lateral decubitus position with hips and knees flexed. A lumbar drainage catheter was inserted using a HermeticTM lumbar accessory kit (Integra Neurosciences, Plainsboro, NJ, USA) in the patients. ICP monitoring via lumbar drainage catheter was practiced using the LiquoGuard® (Möller Medical GmbH \& Co KG, Fulda, Germany). ICP control strategies was initiated when ICP exceeded 15 mmHg in the absence of noxious stimuli at the rate of 10\~20 ml/h via a lumbar drainage catheter until ICP was less than 15 mmHg \[14, 15\].

the lumbar CSF drainage group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

A previous study reported ICP on 24 h after ROSC was 189.00 ± 46.02 mmH2O in good outcome and 265.56 ± 72.43 mmH2O in poor outcome, 40 patients were needed to achieve the power of 0.90 at a significance level of 0.01 (two-sided test).

You may qualify if:

  • Resuscitated out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients
  • OHCA patients whose GCS is 8 or less after ROSC
  • OHCA patients who undergo TTM

You may not qualify if:

  • \< 18 y of age
  • Traumatic CA
  • Interrupted TTM due to hemodynamic instability
  • Intracranial hemorrhage
  • Active bleeding
  • Known terminal illness
  • Poor pre-arrest neurological status
  • Brain computed tomography showed severe cerebral edema
  • Brain computed tomography showed obliteration of the basal cisterns
  • Brain computed tomography showed occult intracranial mass lesion
  • Antiplatelet therapy
  • Anticoagulation therapy
  • Platelet count \< 40,000/mL
  • International normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5
  • OHCA patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chungnam National University Hospital

Daejeon, 35015, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Iida K, Satoh H, Arita K, Nakahara T, Kurisu K, Ohtani M. Delayed hyperemia causing intracranial hypertension after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 1997 Jun;25(6):971-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199706000-00013.

    PMID: 9201049BACKGROUND
  • Polderman KH. Mechanisms of action, physiological effects, and complications of hypothermia. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;37(7 Suppl):S186-202. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181aa5241.

    PMID: 19535947BACKGROUND
  • You Y, Park J, Min J, Yoo I, Jeong W, Cho Y, Ryu S, Lee J, Kim S, Cho S, Oh S, Lee J, Ahn H, Lee B, Lee D, Na K, In Y, Kwack C, Lee J. Relationship between time related serum albumin concentration, optic nerve sheath diameter, cerebrospinal fluid pressure, and neurological prognosis in cardiac arrest survivors. Resuscitation. 2018 Oct;131:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 4.

    PMID: 30086374BACKGROUND
  • Park JS, You Y, Min JH, Yoo I, Jeong W, Cho Y, Ryu S, Lee J, Kim SW, Cho SU, Oh SK, Ahn HJ, Lee J, Lee IH. Study on the timing of severe blood-brain barrier disruption using cerebrospinal fluid-serum albumin quotient in post cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management. Resuscitation. 2019 Feb;135:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

    PMID: 30612965BACKGROUND
  • Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM, Shutter L, Tasker RC, Vavilala MS, Wilberger J, Wright DW, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432.

    PMID: 27654000BACKGROUND
  • Cushing H. Some aspects of the pathological physiology of intracranial tumors. Boston Med Surg J 1909; 141:71-80.

    BACKGROUND
  • Nash CS. Cerebellar herniation as a cause of death. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1937; 46: 673-80.

    BACKGROUND
  • VERBRUGGHEN A. Spinal puncture. Surg Clin North Am. 1946 Feb:78-90. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21015502BACKGROUND
  • Munch EC, Bauhuf C, Horn P, Roth HR, Schmiedek P, Vajkoczy P. Therapy of malignant intracranial hypertension by controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Crit Care Med. 2001 May;29(5):976-81. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200105000-00016.

    PMID: 11378607BACKGROUND
  • Manet R, Payen JF, Guerin R, Martinez O, Hautefeuille S, Francony G, Gergele L. Using external lumbar CSF drainage to treat communicating external hydrocephalus in adult patients after acute traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Oct;159(10):2003-2009. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3290-1. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

    PMID: 28791479BACKGROUND
  • Murad A, Ghostine S, Colohan AR. A case for further investigating the use of controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage for the control of intracranial pressure. World Neurosurg. 2012 Jan;77(1):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

    PMID: 22154151BACKGROUND
  • Engelborghs S, Niemantsverdriet E, Struyfs H, Blennow K, Brouns R, Comabella M, Dujmovic I, van der Flier W, Frolich L, Galimberti D, Gnanapavan S, Hemmer B, Hoff E, Hort J, Iacobaeus E, Ingelsson M, Jan de Jong F, Jonsson M, Khalil M, Kuhle J, Lleo A, de Mendonca A, Molinuevo JL, Nagels G, Paquet C, Parnetti L, Roks G, Rosa-Neto P, Scheltens P, Skarsgard C, Stomrud E, Tumani H, Visser PJ, Wallin A, Winblad B, Zetterberg H, Duits F, Teunissen CE. Consensus guidelines for lumbar puncture in patients with neurological diseases. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 May 18;8:111-126. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.007. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28603768BACKGROUND
  • Song G, You Y, Jeong W, Lee J, Cho Y, Lee S, Ryu S, Lee J, Kim S, Yoo I. Vasopressor requirement during targeted temperature management for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by acute myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 31;3(1):20-26. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.090. eCollection 2016 Mar.

    PMID: 27752611BACKGROUND
  • Naito H, Isotani E, Callaway CW, Hagioka S, Morimoto N. Intracranial Pressure Increases During Rewarming Period After Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia in Postcardiac Arrest Patients. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2016 Dec;6(4):189-193. doi: 10.1089/ther.2016.0009. Epub 2016 May 23.

    PMID: 27213805BACKGROUND
  • Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE, Ainslie PN, Gooderham P, Foster D, Czosnyka M, Robba C, Cardim D. Intracranial pressure and compliance in hypoxic ischemic brain injury patients after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2019 Aug;141:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.036. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

    PMID: 31185256BACKGROUND
  • Park JS, Cho Y, You Y, Min JH, Jeong W, Ahn HJ, Kang C, Yoo I, Ryu S, Lee J, Kim SW, Cho SU, Oh SK, Lee J, Lee IH. Optimal timing to measure optic nerve sheath diameter as a prognostic predictor in post-cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management. Resuscitation. 2019 Oct;143:173-179. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

    PMID: 31306717BACKGROUND
  • Longstreth WT Jr, Nichol G, Van Ottingham L, Hallstrom AP. Two simple questions to assess neurologic outcomes at 3 months after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: experience from the public access defibrillation trial. Resuscitation. 2010 May;81(5):530-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.011. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

    PMID: 20172643BACKGROUND
  • Ameloot K, De Deyne C, Ferdinande B, Dupont M, Palmers PJ, Petit T, Eertmans W, Moonen C, Belmans A, Lemmens R, Dens J, Janssens S. Mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg versus 85-100 mm Hg in comatose survivors after cardiac arrest: Rationale and study design of the Neuroprotect post-cardiac arrest trial. Am Heart J. 2017 Sep;191:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

    PMID: 28888275BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestBrain Edema

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart ArrestHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Yeonho You, professor

    Chungnam National University Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
6 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2020

First Posted

April 1, 2020

Study Start

July 5, 2021

Primary Completion

April 2, 2023

Study Completion

January 16, 2024

Last Updated

February 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations