Crossover Comparison of Tidal Volume Delivery During Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Preterm Infants: Infant Cannula vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Prongs
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Crossover bedside clinical study to examine relative tidal volume delivery during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and directly compare the RAM® infant cannula to a nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) delivery system in vivo. The study population will consist of preterm neonates with mild respiratory insufficiency who are receiving NIPPV, non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV NAVA), or nCPAP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedMarch 30, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.3 years
March 26, 2020
March 26, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Relative tidal volume delivery, breath type I
Relative tidal volume measured in arbitrary units (AU) via RIP bands during synchronized breaths
1 hour
Relative tidal volume delivery, breath type II
Relative tidal volume measured in arbitrary units (AU) via RIP bands during ventilator-driven breaths
1 hour
Relative tidal volume delivery, breath type III
Relative tidal volume measured in arbitrary units (AU) via RIP bands during patient-driven breaths
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Ventilator pressure delivery
1 hour
Ventilator flow delivery
1 hour
Heart rate
1 hour
Oxygen saturation
1 hour
Transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension
1 hour
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
nCPAP prongs
ACTIVE COMPARATORInfant cannula
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Randomized to initial interface of nCPAP prongs or infant cannula
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Chronologic age less than 28 days
- Gestational age at birth between 24 weeks 0 days to 34 weeks 6 days
- Currently receiving NIPPV, NIV NAVA, or nCPAP
You may not qualify if:
- Oxygen requirement greater than 40%
- Peak inspiratory pressure greater than 20 cm H2O
- Major congenital anomalies of the heart or lungs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States
Related Publications (1)
Lynch AL, Matlock DN, Akmyradov C, Weisner MD, Beck J, Sinderby C, Courtney SE. Tidal volume delivery during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: infant cannula vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure prongs. J Perinatol. 2024 Feb;44(2):244-249. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01846-7. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
PMID: 38129599DERIVED
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2020
First Posted
March 30, 2020
Study Start
March 7, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
March 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03