Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: A Miracle Drug or a Moral Hazard
1 other identifier
observational
2,647
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators study the behavioral consequences of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis or PrEP on sexual health behaviors, sexual health outcomes, and partner selection preferences. The study collects observational, self-reported data on PrEP status, PrEP taking-history, PrEP adherence over the last 30 days, STD diagnosis history dating back to January 2015 up to December 2019, sexual health behaviors (e.g., positioning, number of lifetime/recent partners, condom adherence etc.), and various demographic characteristics. The survey finishes with a conjoint experiment which asks respondents to select between two potential partners, and follow-up question about each profiles. Potential partners' characteristics include recreational drug use and condom adherence. Recruitment is conducted via running an ad on Facebook in New York, London, Toronto and Sydney for comparative purposes, as these metro areas have varying levels of PrEP use and accessibility.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 29, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2020
CompletedOctober 14, 2020
October 1, 2020
2 months
February 29, 2020
October 12, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Syphilis diagnosis
Self-reported diagnosis of syphilis
All diagnosis data is collected in a time-stamped fashion between January 2015 and December 2019; diagnosis is reported within the year, but not in a specific month/day
Chlamydia diagnosis
Self-reported diagnosis of chlamydia
All diagnosis data is collected in a time-stamped fashion between January 2015 and December 2019; diagnosis is reported within the year, but not in a specific month/day
Gonorrhea diagnosis
Self-reported diagnosis of gonorrhea
All diagnosis data is collected in a time-stamped fashion between January 2015 and December 2019; diagnosis is reported within the year, but not in a specific month/day
Sexually transmitted diseases
Self-reported diagnosis of any STD
All diagnosis data is collected in a time-stamped fashion between January 2015 and December 2019; diagnosis is reported within the year, but not in a specific month/day
Percent of time that condoms were used in sexual intercourse
Self-reported condom adherence
12 months
Number of ongoing sexual relationships
Self-reported number of concurrent sexual partners
Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Number of sexual partners over the past 12 months
Self-reported number of sexual partners over the past 12 months
12 months
Selecting a potential date with many recent partners
The likelihood of selecting a potential date with 6 or more recent sexual partners in the conjoint experiment. Both AMCEs (average marginal component effects) and marginal means will be computed, see statistical analysis plan. As part of a conjoint experiment the investigators expose participants to a partner selection task. The attributes in the experiment and possible attribute values can be seen below: Race/ethnicity: White/Black/Asian Education: High school/Undergraduate degree/Graduate degree Number of sexual partners (past 3 months): 1/2-5 partners/6 or more Recreational drug use: Never/Sometimes/Often Seeking a...: Committed relationship/Casual relationship Use of condoms: Occasional/Frequent
Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Selecting a potential date with frequent recreational drug use
The likelihood of selecting a potential date with frequent recreational drug use in the conjoint experiment. Both AMCEs (average marginal component effects) and marginal means will be computed, see statistical analysis plan. As part of a conjoint experiment the investigators expose participants to a partner selection task. The attributes in the experiment and possible attribute values can be seen below: Race/ethnicity: White/Black/Asian Education: High school/Undergraduate degree/Graduate degree Number of sexual partners (past 3 months): 1/2-5 partners/6 or more Recreational drug use: Never/Sometimes/Often Seeking a...: Committed relationship/Casual relationship Use of condoms: Occasional/Frequent
Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Selecting a potential date with occasional condom adherence
The likelihood of selecting a potential date with occasional condom use in the conjoint experiment. Both AMCEs (average marginal component effects) and marginal means will be computed, see statistical analysis plan. As part of a conjoint experiment the investigators expose participants to a partner selection task. The attributes in the experiment and possible attribute values can be seen below: Race/ethnicity: White/Black/Asian Education: High school/Undergraduate degree/Graduate degree Number of sexual partners (past 3 months): 1/2-5 partners/6 or more Recreational drug use: Never/Sometimes/Often Seeking a...: Committed relationship/Casual relationship Use of condoms: Occasional/Frequent
Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Other Outcomes (1)
The likelihood at which a respondent would engage a partner in casual sex with without using condoms
Through study completion, approximately 2 months
Study Arms (1)
Respondents on PrEP
On PrEP status will be operationalized in multiple ways, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted using multiple definitions as a result of the self-reported nature of the study. 1. Respondents "on PrEP" are respondents who reported that they are currently on PrEP 2. Respondents "on PrEP" are respondents who reported to have ever been on PrEP 3. When respondents are used as their own controls, years on PrEP will be those in which they reported to have been on PrEP for at lest 6 months, and PrEP initiation will be the first such year A comparison group will be constructed by matching on a variety of characteristics, when this method is applied. Most importantly, age, and STD testing frequency among others, which influence the likelihood of being on PrEP and via that avenue sexual practices, as well as the likelihood of detecting STDs (i.e., ascertainment bias). In other models adjustments will be made for these factors.
Interventions
The investigators measure self-reported PrEP status as exposure, i.e., PrEP status is not confirmed via matched medical records or any other type of information directly collected form subjects.
Eligibility Criteria
The survey is being distributed via Facebook ads, which are geographically targeted in the above-mentioned metro areas, with filters set up to target specifically males who are likely to be men who have sex with men (MSM). This latter is achieved by setting up a long list of sites that have been liked or followed, which map onto sexual orientation. The survey is incentivized with an Amazon gift card to be given to a randomly selected participant in each of the geographic areas after completion. Those who click on the ad are directed to the survey. They first receive questions that gauges their eligibility, and in case they are not eligible, they are screened out of the survey, and are not eligible to enroll in the raffle for the gift card, which is only available for those who finished the sutdy.
You may qualify if:
- years or above
- living in the London, New York, Toronto or Sydney metro area
- self-reported sex at birth is male
- reported ever having sex with a male
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New York University Abu Dhabi
Abu Dhabi, 00000, United Arab Emirates
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kinga R Makovi, PhD
New York University Abu Dhabi
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2020
First Posted
March 27, 2020
Study Start
January 20, 2020
Primary Completion
March 15, 2020
Study Completion
March 15, 2020
Last Updated
October 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10