NCT04325477

Brief Summary

This study was designed as an open label, feasibility, single-center, cross-over prospective study in women with stress urinary incontinence. Subjects served as their own control.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 31, 2017

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 7, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

March 20, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

intravaginal devicepad weight gainstress urinary incontinence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Continuous percent change in urine leakage

    Continuous percent change in urine leakage is defined as: 100%\*(PWG without Nolix - PWG with Nolix)/PWG without Nolix.

    Pads were measured before and immediately after the 1 hour PWG test

  • Change in the dryness of the pad

    Success ("1") if following the 1-hour PWG test, the pad weight increases by no more than 1 gram or Failure ("0") if following the 1-hour test, the pad weight increased by more than 1 gram.

    Pads were measured before and immediately after the 1 hour PWG

  • Dichotomous change in urine leakage

    In accordance with FDA recommendations, the clinically meaningful level of improvement in PWG is at least 50%. Therefore, the dichotomous change is defined for each patient as follows: Success ("1"), if continuous percent change in PWG \> 50% or Failure ("0"), if continuous percent change in PWG \< 50%

    Pads were measured before and immediately after the 1 hour PWG

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Comfort during Nolix use

    1 Day

  • Overall satisfaction: Nolix Satisfaction Questionnaire

    1 Day

Study Arms (1)

Nolix Device

EXPERIMENTAL

Comparing use of device to non-treatment (pads only) phase

Device: Nolix Device

Interventions

The Nolix device is a single use, dynamic, and soft flexible intra-vaginal device for temporary management of SUI

Nolix Device

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Females aged 21 and above
  • Suffering from Stress Urinary Incontinence
  • Women who can understand the nature of the study, are physically able to perform all required tasks and consent to it by signing a written Informed Consent Form prior to participation in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Age ≤ 21 years
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Vaginal birth or Cesarean section for the last 3 months prior to entering the study.
  • Severely atrophic vagina.
  • A history of Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS).
  • Active urinary tract or vaginal infection.
  • Patients prone to recurrent vaginal or urinary tract infections (i.e. more than 3 times in the past year).
  • Has experienced unusual or unexpected vaginal bleeding within the last 6 months.
  • Vaginal surgery within the last 3 months prior to entering the study.
  • Has experienced difficulties with the use of intra-vaginal devices, including tampons.
  • Presence of any condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
  • Average daily PWG as measured in the baseline pad period is less than 4 grams /12 hours.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assuta Medical Center

Haifa, Israel

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Krhut J, Zachoval R, Smith PP, Rosier PF, Valansky L, Martan A, Zvara P. Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Jun;33(5):507-10. doi: 10.1002/nau.22436. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

    PMID: 23797972BACKGROUND
  • Naor MS, Kaploun A, Friedman B. A feasibility study with a novel, dynamic, and disposable over-the-counter device for the management of stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Feb;40(2):653-658. doi: 10.1002/nau.24598. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urinary IncontinenceUrination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Boris Friedman, Dr

    Carmel Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: A prospective one-arm study with subjects serving as their own control.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2020

First Posted

March 27, 2020

Study Start

October 31, 2017

Primary Completion

October 30, 2018

Study Completion

October 30, 2018

Last Updated

April 7, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

All personal data gathered in this trial will be treated in the strictest confidence by investigators, monitors, sponsor's personnel and independent ethics committee

Locations