Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate a self-adhesive flowable resin composite, a flowable resin composite with high viscosity and a conventional flowable resin composite in combination with a universal adhesive using two different application modes. All patients will receive at least 4 occlusal restorations. Cavities will be divided into four groups according to restorative systems used: Constic (a self-adhering flowable composite), G-ænial Universal Flo (a highly filled flowable composite), Tetric N-Flow (self-etch) (a conventional flowable composite), Tetrin N-Flow (etch\&rinse).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
ExpectedDecember 3, 2025
December 1, 2025
2 months
March 25, 2020
December 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical performances of different flowable resin composite
Two year results according to USPHS criteria
two years
Study Arms (4)
Constic
EXPERIMENTALConstic (DMG, Hamburg, Germany)
G-ænial Universal Flo
EXPERIMENTALG-ænial Universal Flo (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in combination with G-Premio Bond (self-etch mode)
Tetric N-Flow (self-etch)
EXPERIMENTALTetric N-Flow (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) in combination with Tetric N-Bond Universal (self-etch mode)
Tetric N-Flow (etch&rinse)
EXPERIMENTALTetric N-Flow (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) in combination with Tetric N-Bond Universal (etch\&rinse mode)
Interventions
Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, self-etch mode)
Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, etch\&rinse mode)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- having no medical or behavioral problems preventing then from attending review visits
- absence of previously placed restorations
- having antagonist teeth
You may not qualify if:
- poor gingival health
- uncontrolled, rampant caries
- bruxism
- removable partial dentures
- xerostomia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hacettepe University
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2020
First Posted
March 27, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12