NMES and Chronic Ankle Instability
The Role of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on Improving Function in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic ankle instability is associated with changes in the nervous system that amount to increased difficulty in activating the stabilizing muscles of the ankle. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation involves using electricity to activate those muscles in bursts, and is commonly used to improve muscle function in those with ACL injury. This study will provide 5 treatments over 2 weeks in patients with Chronic Ankle Instability and determine if Electrical Stimulation can change neural excitability, balance, neuromuscular control, and perceived function in these individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Nov 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2020
CompletedMarch 26, 2020
March 1, 2020
8 months
January 7, 2020
March 24, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Tibialis Anterior corticospinal excitability
Motor evoked potential size of tibialis anterior
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Soleus corticospinal excitability
Motor evoked potential size of soleus
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Peroneus Longus corticospinal excitability
Motor evoked potential size of peroneus longus
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Tibialis anterior reflexive excitability
H:M ratio of tibialis anterior
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Soleus reflexive excitability
H:M ratio of soleus
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Peroneus longus reflexive excitability
H:M ratio of peroneus longus
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Dynamic postural stability index
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Tibialis Anterior muscle activation
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Soleus muscle activation
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Peroneus Longus muscle activation
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
Ankle Eversion Strength
Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
NMES
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental treatment of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation over the Peroneus Longus.
TENS
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe placebo treatment of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation over the same region as the peroneus longus
Interventions
5 sessions that consist of NMES over the peroneus longus muscle. This consists of a biphasic current with a phase duration of 240us delivered in a frequency of 75 pules per second, with a ramp-up time of 2-seconds, followed by a 50-s rest period (no stimulation). Each cycle will consist of 10 seconds of "on" time, and 50 seconds off, with 10 cycles being performed each session.
5 sessions that consist of 11-minutes of TENS over the skin of the peroneus longus. This consists of a biphasic current will be continuously applied at 100 pulses per second, with a phase duration of 100us for 10 minutes. The intensity will be turned up until the point the subjects feel the current (sensory threshold)
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- History of fracture or surgery to the legs
- Injury to the lower legs within 3 months prior to reporting for testing that resulted in modified physical activity.
- Currently involved in an ankle rehabilitation program.
- Failing to meet standards for the safe practice of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation (See questionnaire). Briefly, this includes personal or family history of seizure or epilepsy; current medication use that raises risk of seizure; implanted metal, medication devices, etc.; history of brain or heart surgery; and sensitivity of the scalp or skin.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leon Levine Hall for Health Sciences
Boone, North Carolina, 28608, United States
Related Publications (1)
Needle AR, Tinsley JE, Cash JJ, Koeval BK, Barton JA, Howard JS. The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the ankle pronators on neural excitability & functional status in patients with chronic ankle instability. Phys Ther Sport. 2023 Mar;60:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
PMID: 36634453DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2020
First Posted
March 26, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
November 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share