NCT04322409

Brief Summary

Chronic ankle instability is associated with changes in the nervous system that amount to increased difficulty in activating the stabilizing muscles of the ankle. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation involves using electricity to activate those muscles in bursts, and is commonly used to improve muscle function in those with ACL injury. This study will provide 5 treatments over 2 weeks in patients with Chronic Ankle Instability and determine if Electrical Stimulation can change neural excitability, balance, neuromuscular control, and perceived function in these individuals.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 7, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 26, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 26, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

January 7, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 24, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Tibialis Anterior corticospinal excitability

    Motor evoked potential size of tibialis anterior

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • Soleus corticospinal excitability

    Motor evoked potential size of soleus

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • Peroneus Longus corticospinal excitability

    Motor evoked potential size of peroneus longus

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • Tibialis anterior reflexive excitability

    H:M ratio of tibialis anterior

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • Soleus reflexive excitability

    H:M ratio of soleus

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • Peroneus longus reflexive excitability

    H:M ratio of peroneus longus

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Dynamic postural stability index

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • Tibialis Anterior muscle activation

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • Soleus muscle activation

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • Peroneus Longus muscle activation

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • Ankle Eversion Strength

    Baseline, Week-2 (end of intervention), Week-4 (retention)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

NMES

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental treatment of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation over the Peroneus Longus.

Device: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

TENS

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The placebo treatment of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation over the same region as the peroneus longus

Device: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Interventions

5 sessions that consist of NMES over the peroneus longus muscle. This consists of a biphasic current with a phase duration of 240us delivered in a frequency of 75 pules per second, with a ramp-up time of 2-seconds, followed by a 50-s rest period (no stimulation). Each cycle will consist of 10 seconds of "on" time, and 50 seconds off, with 10 cycles being performed each session.

Also known as: NMES
NMES

5 sessions that consist of 11-minutes of TENS over the skin of the peroneus longus. This consists of a biphasic current will be continuously applied at 100 pulses per second, with a phase duration of 100us for 10 minutes. The intensity will be turned up until the point the subjects feel the current (sensory threshold)

Also known as: TENS
TENS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may not qualify if:

  • History of fracture or surgery to the legs
  • Injury to the lower legs within 3 months prior to reporting for testing that resulted in modified physical activity.
  • Currently involved in an ankle rehabilitation program.
  • Failing to meet standards for the safe practice of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation (See questionnaire). Briefly, this includes personal or family history of seizure or epilepsy; current medication use that raises risk of seizure; implanted metal, medication devices, etc.; history of brain or heart surgery; and sensitivity of the scalp or skin.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leon Levine Hall for Health Sciences

Boone, North Carolina, 28608, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Needle AR, Tinsley JE, Cash JJ, Koeval BK, Barton JA, Howard JS. The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the ankle pronators on neural excitability & functional status in patients with chronic ankle instability. Phys Ther Sport. 2023 Mar;60:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 9.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitationAnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Central Study Contacts

Alan R Needle, Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: 2x3 Factorial; 2 groups by 3 time points
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2020

First Posted

March 26, 2020

Study Start

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion

June 30, 2020

Study Completion

November 1, 2020

Last Updated

March 26, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations