Adhesion Performance Study of Lidocaine Topical System 1.8% Compared to Lidocaine Patch 5% and Lidocaine Medicated Plaster 5% in Healthy, Adult, Human Subjects
An Open Label, Three-period, Single-application, Adhesion Performance Study ZTlido® (Lidocaine Topical System) 1.8% Compared to Lidoderm® (Lidocaine Patch 5%) and Versatis® (Lidocaine Medicated Plaster 5%) in Healthy, Adult, Human Subjects
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the adhesion performance of ZTlido® (lidocaine topical system) 1.8% compared to adhesion performance for Lidoderm® (lidocaine patch 5%) and Versatis® (lidocaine medicated plaster 5%).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 healthy
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_1 healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 14, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2020
CompletedMarch 24, 2020
March 1, 2020
1 month
March 20, 2020
March 23, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Mean Adhesion Score (FDA scale)
Adhesion of the product to the skin is assessed by the FDA 0-4 scoring system. The scoring for adhesion is indicated as follows: 0 = ≥ 90% Adhered (essentially no lift off the skin), 1 = ≥ 75% to \< 90% Adhered (some edges only lifting off the skin), 2 = ≥ 50% to \< 75% Adhered (less than half of the patch lifting off the skin), \> 0% to \< 50% Adhered but not detached (more than half of the patch lifting off the skin without falling off), and 4 = 0% adhered (patched completely detached). Adhesion is assessed every 3 hours for 12 hours. The mean cumulative adhesion score is calculated as the sum of scores at each assessment time point divided by the total number of observations.
12 hours post-dose
Mean Adhesion Score (EMA scale)
Adhesion of the product to the skin is assessed by the EMA 0-6 scoring system. The scoring for adhesion is indicated as follows: 0 = \< 70% Adhered, 1 = \> 70% Adhered, 2 = \> 75% Adhered, 3 = \> 80% Adhered, 4 = \> 85% Adhered, 5 = \> 90% adhered, and 6 = \> 95% Adhered. Adhesion is assessed every 3 hours for 12 hours. The mean cumulative adhesion score is calculated as the sum of scores at each assessment time point divided by the total number of observations.
12 hours post-dose
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Dermal Response Score
12.5 and 14 hours post-dose
Study Arms (3)
Lidocaine Patch (Sequence ABC)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects received all three topical lidocaine products in Periods 1, 2, and 3. The sequence in which they received the lidocaine products was determined by random assignment. For subjects in Arm 1, 3 lidocaine 1.8% patches were applied in Period 1, and 3 lidocaine 5% patches were applied in Period 2, and 3 lidocaine 5% medicated plasters were applied in Period 3.
Lidocaine Patch (Sequence CAB)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects received all three topical lidocaine products in Periods 1, 2, and 3. The sequence in which they received the lidocaine products was determined by random assignment. For subjects in Arm 2, 3 lidocaine 5% medicated plasters were applied in Period 1, and 3 lidocaine 1.8% patches were applied in Period 2, and 3 lidocaine 5% patches were applied in Period 3.
Lidocaine Patch (Sequences BCA)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects received all three topical lidocaine products in Periods 1, 2, and 3. The sequence in which they received the lidocaine products was determined by random assignment. For subjects in Arm 3, 3 lidocaine 5% patches were applied in Period 1, and 3 lidocaine 5% medicated plasters were applied in Period 2, and 3 lidocaine 1.8% patches were applied in Period 3.
Interventions
Three patches are applied to the subject's back for 12 hours.
Three patches are applied to the subject's back for 12 hours.
Three plasters are applied to the subject's back for 12 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be healthy based on by medical history, laboratory work, and physical exam with BMI range between 18.00 and 30.00 kg/m2 inclusive.
- Non-smokers
- Be at least 18 years of age
- If childbearing potential, use of acceptable form of birth control
- In the case of females of childbearing potential, have a negative serum pregnancy test
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy or known hypersensitivity to lidocaine, amide-type local anesthetics, or any component of the product formulation
- Any major medical illness 3 months prior or any significant history or ongoing chronic medical illness
- Presence of any current dermatological condition including psoriasis, eczema, and atopic dermatitis
- Presence of any skin condition such as scratches, cuts, scars, abrasions, excessive hair, tattoos, moles, recently shaved skin, uneven skin texture, irritated (e.g., redness, rash or having blister, etc.) or excessively oily skin at the application areas that may affect the application of the product or adhesion properties of the product.
- History of significant dermatologic cancers (e.g., melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma) except basal cell carcinomas that were superficial and do not involve the investigative site
- History of addiction, abuse, and misuse of any drug
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
TKL Research, Inc.
Fair Lawn, New Jersey, 07410, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gudin J, Webster LR, Greuber E, Vought K, Patel K, Kuritzky L. Open-Label Adhesion Performance Studies of a New Lidocaine Topical System 1.8% versus Lidocaine Patches 5% and Lidocaine Medicated Plaster 5% in Healthy Subjects. J Pain Res. 2021 Feb 23;14:513-526. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S287153. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33654425DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Phillip LaStella, MD
TKL Research, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2020
First Posted
March 24, 2020
Study Start
February 14, 2017
Primary Completion
March 22, 2017
Study Completion
March 22, 2017
Last Updated
March 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share