Multicentric Prospective Study to Screen Inborn Errors of Metabolism in Non-immune Hydrops (NIH) Fetalis by Massively Parallel Sequencing
ANAMETAB-PRO
2 other identifiers
interventional
71
1 country
17
Brief Summary
A fetal hydrops, also called a fetal anasarca, is the buildup of fluid in the serosa and / or fetal subcutaneous tissue. The diagnosis is made by ultrasound, possibly from the first trimester of pregnancy. The etiologies of hydrops can be immune or non-immune. The historically classic immune causes are linked to fetal-maternal alloimmunizations in erythrocyte blood groups. The implementation of systematic prevention of these anti rhesus immunizations since the 1970s has significantly reduced the incidence of immune hydrops Non-immune hydrops (NIH) now represent 90% of fetal hydrops. Known causes of NIH can be classified in several ways depending on the mechanism or organ involved. The prognosis for NIH is closely linked to the cause. Fetal anemia due to maternal-fetal infections can heal spontaneously or give rise to in utero transfusions. Cardiac rhythm abnormalities are accessible to medical treatment. Chylothorax compressions may benefit from in utero drainage, but chromosomal or metabolic causes cannot benefit from antenatal care. The term of pregnancy in which the hydrops is discovered also has an impact on survival, which however remains poor. In France, certain pathologies can be considered as particularly serious without the possibility of treatment and give rise to a request for medical termination of pregnancy. This possibility is subject to acceptance by two practitioners who are members of a multidisciplinary prenatal diagnostic center (CPDPN). This preliminary multidisciplinary reflection participates in the development of prenatal counseling with the greatest precision in diagnostic hypotheses. This prenatal advice is essential for a couple on the decision to make a pregnancy in progress but also for future pregnancies, given the 25% risk of recurrence due to the autosomal recessive mode of transmission. Thus the current screening strategy for inherited metabolic diseases on amniotic fluid is fragmented. The resulting subdiagnosis explains the objective of the study of using the new high throughput sequencing techniques (NGS) in this indication. This approach should make it possible to reduce the number of cases classified as idiopathic, to allow the parents concerned to receive suitable genetic counseling with a view to new pregnancies, and to refine the knowledge of the prenatal epidemiology of these pathologies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 12, 2024
CompletedNovember 8, 2024
November 1, 2024
3 years
February 28, 2020
November 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of fetuses for which a genetic anomaly responsible for antenatal revelation Non Immun Hydrops by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis
Proportion of fetuses for which a genetic anomaly responsible for antenatal revelation Non Immun Hydrops can be detected by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis of the gene panel incriminated in inherited metabolic malformation compared to the proportion of fetuses for which a genetic anomaly has been identified by the technique current standard biochemical.
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Comparison of percentage of etiology detected between the NGS technique and the biochemical technique.
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
time to return the results in days of NGS techniques
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
number of technical failure of these new tools of NGS techniques
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
Number of cases where the interpretation of the genetic variants did not lead to a conclusion
during pregnancy after the 14th week of amenorrhea
number of week of amenorrhea of gestation
immediately after the child birth
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
pregnant patient whose fetuses have an antenatal NIH
EXPERIMENTALAll pregnant patients whose fetuses have an antenatal revelation of NIH from the first trimester ultrasound scan will be included in this study.
Interventions
Amniotic liquid of each selected patients will be tested by both technic to describe and detect etiological information. Each patient will be tested using the current procedure with a defined panel of genes as well as with the NGS procedure. The results of both procedures will be compared.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient\> 18 years old
- Single Pregnancy
- Presence of an ultrasound defined as follows and confirmed by a multidisciplinary prenatal diagnostic center CPDPN:
- Before 14 weeks: Generalized subcutaneous edema descending to the abdomen, associated or not with peri-visceral effusion
- After 14 weeks: presence of at least 2 of the following criteria: ascites, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, subcutaneous edema, placental edema, hydramnios.
- Persistent hygroma after 14 weeks of amenorrhea
- Persistent isolated perivisceral effusions without etiologies found
- Patient having an invasive diagnostic sample (amniocentesis)
- Social insured in France
- Patient who signed the informed consent of the study
You may not qualify if:
- NIH whose diagnosis is known and confirmed as non-metabolic by a CPDPN
- Non-progressive pregnancy with Fetal Death in utero with normal previous ultrasound monitoring
- Refusal of invasive diagnostic sampling
- Patient under legal protection measure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
CHU Besançon
Besançon, 25000 Besancon, France
CHU Pellegrin
Bordeaux, 33076, France
Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant
Bron, 69500, France
Hôpital d'Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
Hôpital Le Bocage
Dijon, 21079, France
CHU Grenoble
La Tronche, 38700, France
CHU Limoges
Limoges, 87042, France
Hopital Croix Rousse
Lyon, 69004, France
Hopital Nord
Marseille, 13000, France
CHU Marseille Timone
Marseille, 13005, France
CHU Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
Hôpital Archet 2
Nice, 06200, France
APHP Trousseau
Paris, 75012, France
Hopital Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69310, France
CHU Saint Etienne
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270, France
Hôpital Paule de Viguier;
Toulouse, 31059, France
CHU de Nancy Brabois,
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2020
First Posted
March 16, 2020
Study Start
April 12, 2021
Primary Completion
April 12, 2024
Study Completion
April 12, 2024
Last Updated
November 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share