NCT04305184

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ASP0598 Otic Solution. This study also evaluated the efficacy of ASP0598 otic solution.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 10, 2020

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 24, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 24, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 7, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 25, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

March 10, 2020

Results QC Date

January 11, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

ASP0598

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in SAD

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an investigational product (IP), and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. A TEAE is defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug through end of study visit.

    From first dose up to day 57

  • Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Cholesteatoma or Ear Neoplasm in SAD

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with cholesteatoma or ear neoplasm is reported.

    From first dose up to day 57

  • Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Ototoxic Symptoms (Tinnitus, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Dizziness) in SAD

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with any ototoxic symptoms (tinnitus, sensorineural hearing loss, dizziness) is reported.

    From first dose up to day 57

  • Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Otitis Media or Otitis Externa in SAD

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with otitis media or otitis externa is reported.

    From first dose up to day 57

  • Change From Baseline in Bone Conduction Hearing at 1, 2, 4 kHz by Pure Tone Audiometry at Week 8/EOS in SAD

    PTA was a behavioral and quantitative hearing test to assess hearing. Pure tone air conduction and bone conduction tests were used to determine whether there was any unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, what type of hearing loss was present, which frequencies were impacted, and the magnitude of the hearing loss.

    Baseline and week 8

  • Change From Baseline in TVAS at Week 8/EOS in SAD

    TVAS was used by participants to rate their tinnitus at baseline and week 8. The scale was a numeric scale and ranged from 0 (not at all strong or loud) to 10 (extremely strong or loud). A lower value indicates less level of discomfort. For the change from baseline, a negative value indicates improvement (less level of discomfort).

    Baseline and week 8

  • Number of Participants With TEAEs in MAD

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. A TEAE is defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug through end of study visit.

    From first dose up to day 85

  • Number of Participants With AE Special Interest as Cholesteatoma or Ear Neoplasm in MAD

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with cholesteatoma or ear neoplasm is reported.

    From first dose up to day 85

  • Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Ototoxic Symptoms (Tinnitus, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Dizziness) in MAD

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with any Ototoxic symptoms (tinnitus, sensorineural hearing loss, dizziness) is reported

    From first dose up to day 85

  • Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Otitis Media or Otitis Externa in MAD

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with otitis media or otitis externa is reported.

    From first dose up to day 85

  • Change From Baseline in Bone Conduction Hearing at 1, 2, 4 kHz by Pure Tone Audiometry at Week 12/EOS in MAD

    PTA was a behavioral and quantitative hearing test to assess hearing. Pure tone air conduction and bone conduction tests were used to determine whether there was any unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, what type of hearing loss was present, which frequencies were impacted, and the magnitude of the hearing loss.

    Baseline and week 12

  • Change From Baseline in TVAS at Week 12/EOS in MAD

    TVAS was used by participants to rate their tinnitus at baseline and week 12. The scale was a numeric scale and ranged from 0 (not at all strong or loud) to 10 (extremely strong or loud). A lower value indicates less level of discomfort. For the change from baseline, a negative value indicates improvement (less level of discomfort).

    Baseline and week 12

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Number of Participants With Complete Closure of Tympanic Membrane Perforation (TMP) at Week 8 for SAD

    Week 8

  • Number of Participants With Complete Closure of TMP at Week 12 for Dose Expansion

    Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in the Ratio of TMP Size Per Total Area of Tympanic Membrane at Week 8 for SAD

    Baseline and week 8

  • Change From Baseline in the Ratio of TMP Size Per Total Area of Tympanic Membrane at Week 12 for Dose Expansion

    Baseline and week 12

  • Change From Baseline in TMP Size at Week 8 for SAD

    Baseline and week 8

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (8)

Single Ascending Dose (SAD): 0.03 mcg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received single dose of 0.03 microgram (mcg) ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 \[End of Study (EOS)\].

Drug: ASP0598

SAD: 0.15 mcg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received single dose of 0.15 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on Day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (EOS).

Drug: ASP0598

SAD: 0.75 mcg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received single dose of 0.75 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (EOS).

Drug: ASP0598

SAD: 2.25 mcg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received single dose of 2.25 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (EOS).

Drug: ASP0598

SAD: Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants received single dose of placebo matched to ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (EOS).

Other: Placebo

Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD): 0.75 mcg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received multiple doses of 0.75 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on days 1, 15 and 29 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 57, and 85 (EOS).

Drug: ASP0598

MAD: 2.25 mcg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received multiple doses of 2.25 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on days 1, 15 and 29 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 57, and 85 (EOS).

Drug: ASP0598

MAD: Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants received multiple doses of placebo matched to ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on days 1, 15 and 29 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 57, and 85 (EOS).

Other: Placebo

Interventions

ASP0598 Otic solution was administered onto the Tympanic Membrane (TM) through the external auditory canal via syringe.

MAD: 2.25 mcgMultiple Ascending Dose (MAD): 0.75 mcgSAD: 0.15 mcgSAD: 0.75 mcgSAD: 2.25 mcgSingle Ascending Dose (SAD): 0.03 mcg
PlaceboOTHER

Placebo matched to ASP0598 Otic solution was administered onto the TM through the external auditory canal via syringe.

MAD: PlaceboSAD: Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject has chronic tympanic membrane perforation (CTMP) documented as persisting longer than 3 months.
  • A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant and at least one of the following conditions applies:
  • Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) OR
  • WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance starting at screening and for at least 28 days after investigational product (IP) application.
  • Female subject must agree not to breastfeed starting at drug application on Day 1 and for at least 28 days after IP application.
  • Female subject must not donate ova starting on Day 1 and for at least 28 days after investigational product (IP) application.
  • A male subject with female partner(s) of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception starting on Day 1 and for at least 28 days after IP application.
  • A male subject must not donate sperm starting on Day 1 and for at least 28 days after IP application.
  • Male subject with a pregnant or breastfeeding partner(s) must agree to remain abstinent or use a condom from Day 1 and for at least 28 days after IP application.
  • Subject must be willing and able to comply with the study requirements including refraining from using prohibited concomitant medications.
  • Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study during the study period.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has one of following conditions that may affect the ipsilateral side of the ear with chronic tympanic membrane perforation (CTMP):
  • Perforation involving 3 or more quadrants.
  • Pin hole perforation (only for the expansion cohort).
  • Presence of tympanosclerosis adjacent to the perforation.
  • Perforation involves malleus erosion.
  • Absent malleus.
  • Marginal perforation (i.e., involving the annulus or exposing the handle of malleus).
  • Tympanic membrane perforation (TMP) caused by electric/slag/blast/burn injury.
  • Post radiated TMP.
  • History of tympanic membrane repair by any type of live tissue.
  • Active otorrhea or active treatment for otorrhea within the last 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Bellucci otorrhea grade 3 or above.
  • Active external ear canal inflammation (otitis externa, dermatitis) or within the last 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Active diagnosis of Eustachian Tube dysfunction or diagnosis within 6 months prior to Screening.
  • Craniofacial abnormalities, History of head and neck surgery within the last 3 months prior to Screening, history of radiation to head and neck.
  • +19 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

Stanford Hospital

Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States

Location

Breathe Clear Institute

Torrance, California, 90503, United States

Location

ENT and Allergy Associates of Florida

Boca Raton, Florida, 33487, United States

Location

Advanced ENT

New Albany, Indiana, 47150, United States

Location

Advanced ENT

Louisville, Kentucky, 40220, United States

Location

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Charlotte ENT Associates

Matthews, North Carolina, 28105, United States

Location

Piedmont ENT

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States

Location

Carolina ENT Clinic

Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118, United States

Location

Richmond ENT

Richmond, Virginia, 23235, United States

Location

Related Links

Limitations and Caveats

Due to limitations of the TM imaging data as evaluated by the central reader, secondary endpoints related to change in TMP size could not be fully evaluated. Following SAD and MAD data review by DMC, the single dose of ASP0598 Otic Solution provided insufficient efficacy to open the single dose expansion study.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Trial Disclosure
Organization
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2020

First Posted

March 12, 2020

Study Start

September 10, 2020

Primary Completion

January 24, 2023

Study Completion

January 24, 2023

Last Updated

November 25, 2024

Results First Posted

February 7, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Locations