Study Stopped
Lack of Efficacy
A Study to Assess ASP0598 Otic Solution Following Topical Application in the Ear in Subjects With Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation (CTMP)
A Phase 1/2, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of ASP0598 Otic Solution Following Topical Application Into the Ear in Subjects With Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation (CTMP)
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ASP0598 Otic Solution. This study also evaluated the efficacy of ASP0598 otic solution.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Sep 2020
Typical duration for phase_1
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 24, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 7, 2024
CompletedNovember 25, 2024
November 1, 2024
2.4 years
March 10, 2020
January 11, 2024
November 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in SAD
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an investigational product (IP), and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. A TEAE is defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug through end of study visit.
From first dose up to day 57
Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Cholesteatoma or Ear Neoplasm in SAD
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with cholesteatoma or ear neoplasm is reported.
From first dose up to day 57
Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Ototoxic Symptoms (Tinnitus, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Dizziness) in SAD
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with any ototoxic symptoms (tinnitus, sensorineural hearing loss, dizziness) is reported.
From first dose up to day 57
Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Otitis Media or Otitis Externa in SAD
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with otitis media or otitis externa is reported.
From first dose up to day 57
Change From Baseline in Bone Conduction Hearing at 1, 2, 4 kHz by Pure Tone Audiometry at Week 8/EOS in SAD
PTA was a behavioral and quantitative hearing test to assess hearing. Pure tone air conduction and bone conduction tests were used to determine whether there was any unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, what type of hearing loss was present, which frequencies were impacted, and the magnitude of the hearing loss.
Baseline and week 8
Change From Baseline in TVAS at Week 8/EOS in SAD
TVAS was used by participants to rate their tinnitus at baseline and week 8. The scale was a numeric scale and ranged from 0 (not at all strong or loud) to 10 (extremely strong or loud). A lower value indicates less level of discomfort. For the change from baseline, a negative value indicates improvement (less level of discomfort).
Baseline and week 8
Number of Participants With TEAEs in MAD
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. A TEAE is defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug through end of study visit.
From first dose up to day 85
Number of Participants With AE Special Interest as Cholesteatoma or Ear Neoplasm in MAD
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with cholesteatoma or ear neoplasm is reported.
From first dose up to day 85
Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Ototoxic Symptoms (Tinnitus, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Dizziness) in MAD
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with any Ototoxic symptoms (tinnitus, sensorineural hearing loss, dizziness) is reported
From first dose up to day 85
Number of Participants With AE of Special Interest as Otitis Media or Otitis Externa in MAD
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of IP whether or not considered related to the IP. Number of participants with otitis media or otitis externa is reported.
From first dose up to day 85
Change From Baseline in Bone Conduction Hearing at 1, 2, 4 kHz by Pure Tone Audiometry at Week 12/EOS in MAD
PTA was a behavioral and quantitative hearing test to assess hearing. Pure tone air conduction and bone conduction tests were used to determine whether there was any unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, what type of hearing loss was present, which frequencies were impacted, and the magnitude of the hearing loss.
Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in TVAS at Week 12/EOS in MAD
TVAS was used by participants to rate their tinnitus at baseline and week 12. The scale was a numeric scale and ranged from 0 (not at all strong or loud) to 10 (extremely strong or loud). A lower value indicates less level of discomfort. For the change from baseline, a negative value indicates improvement (less level of discomfort).
Baseline and week 12
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Number of Participants With Complete Closure of Tympanic Membrane Perforation (TMP) at Week 8 for SAD
Week 8
Number of Participants With Complete Closure of TMP at Week 12 for Dose Expansion
Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Ratio of TMP Size Per Total Area of Tympanic Membrane at Week 8 for SAD
Baseline and week 8
Change From Baseline in the Ratio of TMP Size Per Total Area of Tympanic Membrane at Week 12 for Dose Expansion
Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in TMP Size at Week 8 for SAD
Baseline and week 8
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (8)
Single Ascending Dose (SAD): 0.03 mcg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received single dose of 0.03 microgram (mcg) ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 \[End of Study (EOS)\].
SAD: 0.15 mcg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received single dose of 0.15 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on Day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (EOS).
SAD: 0.75 mcg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received single dose of 0.75 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (EOS).
SAD: 2.25 mcg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received single dose of 2.25 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (EOS).
SAD: Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received single dose of placebo matched to ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on day 1 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (EOS).
Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD): 0.75 mcg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received multiple doses of 0.75 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on days 1, 15 and 29 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 57, and 85 (EOS).
MAD: 2.25 mcg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received multiple doses of 2.25 mcg ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on days 1, 15 and 29 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 57, and 85 (EOS).
MAD: Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received multiple doses of placebo matched to ASP0598 Otic Solution into the affected ear on days 1, 15 and 29 and returned to the investigative site for assessments on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 57, and 85 (EOS).
Interventions
ASP0598 Otic solution was administered onto the Tympanic Membrane (TM) through the external auditory canal via syringe.
Placebo matched to ASP0598 Otic solution was administered onto the TM through the external auditory canal via syringe.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has chronic tympanic membrane perforation (CTMP) documented as persisting longer than 3 months.
- A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant and at least one of the following conditions applies:
- Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) OR
- WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance starting at screening and for at least 28 days after investigational product (IP) application.
- Female subject must agree not to breastfeed starting at drug application on Day 1 and for at least 28 days after IP application.
- Female subject must not donate ova starting on Day 1 and for at least 28 days after investigational product (IP) application.
- A male subject with female partner(s) of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception starting on Day 1 and for at least 28 days after IP application.
- A male subject must not donate sperm starting on Day 1 and for at least 28 days after IP application.
- Male subject with a pregnant or breastfeeding partner(s) must agree to remain abstinent or use a condom from Day 1 and for at least 28 days after IP application.
- Subject must be willing and able to comply with the study requirements including refraining from using prohibited concomitant medications.
- Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study during the study period.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has one of following conditions that may affect the ipsilateral side of the ear with chronic tympanic membrane perforation (CTMP):
- Perforation involving 3 or more quadrants.
- Pin hole perforation (only for the expansion cohort).
- Presence of tympanosclerosis adjacent to the perforation.
- Perforation involves malleus erosion.
- Absent malleus.
- Marginal perforation (i.e., involving the annulus or exposing the handle of malleus).
- Tympanic membrane perforation (TMP) caused by electric/slag/blast/burn injury.
- Post radiated TMP.
- History of tympanic membrane repair by any type of live tissue.
- Active otorrhea or active treatment for otorrhea within the last 3 months prior to Screening.
- Bellucci otorrhea grade 3 or above.
- Active external ear canal inflammation (otitis externa, dermatitis) or within the last 3 months prior to Screening.
- Active diagnosis of Eustachian Tube dysfunction or diagnosis within 6 months prior to Screening.
- Craniofacial abnormalities, History of head and neck surgery within the last 3 months prior to Screening, history of radiation to head and neck.
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Stanford Hospital
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
Breathe Clear Institute
Torrance, California, 90503, United States
ENT and Allergy Associates of Florida
Boca Raton, Florida, 33487, United States
Advanced ENT
New Albany, Indiana, 47150, United States
Advanced ENT
Louisville, Kentucky, 40220, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Charlotte ENT Associates
Matthews, North Carolina, 28105, United States
Piedmont ENT
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Carolina ENT Clinic
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118, United States
Richmond ENT
Richmond, Virginia, 23235, United States
Related Links
Limitations and Caveats
Due to limitations of the TM imaging data as evaluated by the central reader, secondary endpoints related to change in TMP size could not be fully evaluated. Following SAD and MAD data review by DMC, the single dose of ASP0598 Otic Solution provided insufficient efficacy to open the single dose expansion study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trial Disclosure
- Organization
- Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2020
First Posted
March 12, 2020
Study Start
September 10, 2020
Primary Completion
January 24, 2023
Study Completion
January 24, 2023
Last Updated
November 25, 2024
Results First Posted
February 7, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.