Loading search results
Cross-Anacards
Evaluating the Correlation Between the Results of the Allergy Work-up for Different Allergens of the Anacardiaceae Family
Sponsor study identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
May 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Actual (reported)The prevalence of food allergies has increased in recent decades, ranging from 1 to 3% of the general population. According to international literature and French national surveys, nuts today represent a group of allergens often associated with severe allergic reactions. They are responsible for 18 to 40% of deaths from food-related anaphylaxis. Among all nuts, the prevalence of anacardiac allergies (mainly cashew and pistachio) continues to increase and has become a growing public health problem. Today, global production is estimated at 4.9 million tonnes of cashews and 1.1 million tonnes of pistachios. The resulting increased exposure may explain the increased prevalence of allergic reactions reported to these fruits. In addition, anaphylactic reactions to anacardiaceae are reported to be even more severe than those occurring in subjects allergic to peanuts. Cashews and pistachios are known to exhibit immunological cross-reactions with one another. In fact, they have a strong sequential homology between their storage allergens Ana o 1 / Pis v 3 (7S vicilin, 78% homology); Ana o 2 / Pis v 2 (legume 11S, 80% homology) and Ana o 3 / Pis v 1 (albumin 2S, 70% homology). For this reason, some authors talk about the cashew / pistachio syndrome and associate the two allergenic sources by considering them as one, in clinical practice. The diagnosis of allergy to nuts, and therefore to anacardiaceae, is based on a compatible clinical history, the presence of specific IgE (demonstrated by positivity to realistic skin tests and serum IgE assay), and positivity on the oral food challenge test. In clinical practice, taking into account the cashew / pistachio syndrome, when the allergy work-up for cashew is negative, allergists tend to advise to reintroduce pistachio at home, considering the two allergens as sufficiently homologous to authorize such a practice. In this context, the investigators decided to check whether this practice, which is based mainly on in vitro homologies, is risk-free, based on the clinical experience of our center.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
January 1, 2006
Actual (reported)March 9, 2020
Actual (reported)March 11, 2020
Actual (reported)May 1, 2020
Actual (reported)June 1, 2020
Actual (reported)PPV and NPV
PPV and NPV of the results of skin tests and food challenge to either cashew or pistachio to predict a concordant result for pistachio or cashew, respectively
1 day
Relative risk
1 day
All consecutive patients consulting at the Allergy Unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier (France) for a suspected food allergy to Anacardiaceae
Uhmontpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
Davide CAIMMI
University Hospital, Montpellier
100 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
March 9, 2020
First Posted
March 11, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
May 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Last Updated
June 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: