NCT04300985

Brief Summary

Magnesium sulfate (MS) and dexmedetomidine have already demonstrated the ability to reduce intra and postoperative consumption of anesthetics and analgesics, among others advantages, such as blood pressure control and intraoperative bleeding. The MS has also been shown to be useful in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia control, pulmonary hypertension, asthma, cardiac arrhythmias and pheochromocytoma). Despite these advantages in the use of these important adjuncts, there is a concern about the quality and awakening time of the patients who use them. The purpose of this trial is to compare the time and quality of awakening in patients submitted to general anesthesia and receiving MS or dexmedetomidine as adjuncts in the intraoperative analgesia. The main objective of this trial is to compare the quality and the awakening time in patients receiving MS or dexmedetomidine. The secondary objective is the comparison of postoperative analgesia in the postoperative hospitalization period. Hypothesis: Our hypothesis is that patients present a faster awakening when receive MS as an analgesic adjunct, when compared to patients who receive dexmedetomidine. Drawing: this is a prospective, controlled, covert trial with random distribution for noninferiority trialing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2021

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 29, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 9, 2020

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 11, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

February 29, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to awake from anesthesia between groups

    Comparing time in minutes to get bispectral index higher than 60 in both groups

    Three hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparing postoperative analgesia between groups

    Two days

Study Arms (3)

Placebo group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Thirty patients in this group will receive infusion of 100 saline solution. After 15 min of beginning of this infusion they will start receiving general anesthesia administration.

Drug: Sham treatment

Dexmedetomidine group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Thirty patients in this group will receive infusion of dexmedetomidine (0,5 mcg/kg/min). After 15 min of the beginning of this infusion they will start in the general anesthesia induction.

Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Magnesium sulfate group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Thirty patients in this group will receive infusion of magnesium sulfate (20 mg/kg/h). After 15 min of the beginning of this infusion they will start in the general anesthesia induction.

Drug: Magnesium Sulfate

Interventions

Patients will start receiving dexmedetomidine 15 minutes before general anesthetic induction.

Also known as: Dexmedetomidine and general anesthesia
Dexmedetomidine group

Patients will start receiving saline solution infusion 15 minutes before general anesthetic induction.

Also known as: Saline solution and general anesthesia
Placebo group

Patient will start receiving magnesium infusion (20 mg/kg/h) 15 minutes before general anesthetic induction.

Also known as: Magnesium sulfate and general anesthesia
Magnesium sulfate group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for video laparoscopic cholecystectomy, between 18 and 70 years old, physical status I ou II in the American Society of Anesthesiology classification

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy or contraindication to the study protocol substances, refuse to participate or sign the informed consent, heart block \> atrioventricular I, renal failure, brain disease, dementia or other psychiatric diseases, body mass index \> 35 kg/m², Portuguese language limitations, preoperative use of opioid or corticosteroids.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital das Clínicas - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo

São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • 1. Telci L, Esen F, Akcora D, Erden T, Canbolat AT, Akpir K. Evaluation of effects of magnesium sulfate in reducing intraoperative anaesthetic requirements. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89: 594-598. 2. Chen C, Tao R. The impact of magnesium sulfate on pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan. 2018; 28: 349-353. 3. Andjelkovic L, Novak-Jankovic V, Pozar-Lukanovic N, Bosnic Z, Spindler-Vesel A. Influence of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine on perioperative opioid consumption in laparoscopic intrialine resection: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Int Med Res. 2018; 46: 5143-5154.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

DexmedetomidineAnesthesia, GeneralSaline SolutionMagnesium Sulfate

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsAnesthesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsMagnesium CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSulfatesSulfuric AcidsSulfur AcidsSulfur Compounds

Study Officials

  • Sebastião Silva Filho

    Hospital da Sociedade de Beneficência Portuguesa d

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
One professional of the team of providers will be responsible for conducting the electronic drawing on the website www.random.org, to distribute 90 numbers randomly into three groups. By following the results he or she will identify 90 opaque envelopes with numbers, and inside of each envelope will be a card with the name of corresponding group and the instructions about the corresponding intervention. This professional will not take part in any other part of the investigation. Every other professionals of the team and the patient will be blinded to group to which the patient belong. Each of the invited patient who accepts to participate and sign the consent form in the pre-anesthetic consultation, will receive the sequential envelope and be part of the corresponding group. At the arrival in the surgical center, one particular professional of the team will open the envelope and prepare the blinded solution, that will still be unclosed to any other people in the trial.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a prospective, controlled, blinded trial with random distribution.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 29, 2020

First Posted

March 9, 2020

Study Start

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 20, 2022

Study Completion

December 20, 2022

Last Updated

January 11, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We may only share data related to exams, outcomes and other related with the trial, not personal information.

Locations