Defining the Optimal Location to Place an Adductor Canal Block
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the current project is to address a gap in the existing literature related to optimal placement of local anesthetic for an adductor canal (AC) block. The current study seeks to examine whether placement of the local anesthetic in the AC for knee surgery is more effective at reducing post-operative pain following arthroscopic knee surgery compared to a control. Specifically, if the anesthetic is more beneficial than the control group, the research will determine which location is optimal by comparing groups that receive anesthetic in the midpoint of the thigh, the proximal end of the thigh, or the distal end of the thigh.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedMarch 6, 2020
March 1, 2020
10 months
February 18, 2020
March 4, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reported pain as assessed by Wong-Baker FACES scale
Patient self-reported pain intensity following the procedure. The scale ranges from 0-10 (0 = no pain; 10 = extreme). Collected at two points: pre-and-post procedure.
48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Patient reported anxiety as assessed by the Child's Anxiety Meter-State (CAM-S)
48 hours
Parent reported anxiety as assessed by the Child's Anxiety Meter-State (CAM-S
48 hours
Patient reported sensation through ice and pinprick
48 hours
Usage of narcotic pain medication
48 hours
Study Arms (4)
A
PLACEBO COMPARATORSaline will be placed in syringe instead of ropivicaine 0.2% and the nerve block will be placed in the adductor canal at the desired location by the anesthesiologist
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn adductor canal block will be placed with local anesthetic in the proximal 1/3 of the operative leg
C
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn adductor canal block will be placed with local anesthetic in the middle 1/3 of the operative leg
D
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn adductor canal block will be placed with local anesthetic in the distal 1/3 of the operative leg
Interventions
An adductor canal nerve block will be placed in a patient undergoing a knee arthroscopy in 1 of 3 locations with local anesthetic or placebo (without location definition or local anesthetic) to assess optimal placement of local anesthetic, pain management and anxiety scores post operatively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is 7 to ≤ 17 years of age
- Patient at St. Christopher's Hospital for Children
- Receiving a knee arthroscopy procedure
- English speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is less than 7 years of age or over 17 years of age
- Patient has cognitive impairments
- Patient had previous operations on the same lower extremity as the current knee arthroscopy
- Patient has a positive B-HCG (identified through urine or blood test)
- Patient does not speak English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Christopher's Hospital for Children
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103, United States
Related Publications (6)
Wong WY, Bjorn S, Strid JM, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Defining the Location of the Adductor Canal Using Ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):241-245. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000539.
PMID: 28002228BACKGROUNDBendtsen T.F., Lopez A.M., Clark T.B. (2018). Ultrasound-Guided Saphenous (Subsartorius/Adductor Canal) Nerve Block. NYSORA Continuing Medical Education. Retrieved from https://www.nysora.com/ultrasound-guided-saphenous-subsartoriusadductor-canal-nerve-block
BACKGROUNDBurckett-St Laurant D, Peng P, Giron Arango L, Niazi AU, Chan VW, Agur A, Perlas A. The Nerves of the Adductor Canal and the Innervation of the Knee: An Anatomic Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):321-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000389.
PMID: 27015545BACKGROUNDQuemby D. & McEwen A. (2014). Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block (Saphenous Nerve Block). Anesthesia Tutorial of the Week. Retrieved from https://www.aagbi.org/sites/default/files/301%20Ultrasound%20Guided%20Adductor%20Canal%20(Saphenous%20Nerve)%20Block.pdf
BACKGROUNDRunge C, Moriggl B, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. The Spread of Ultrasound-Guided Injectate From the Adductor Canal to the Genicular Branch of the Posterior Obturator Nerve and the Popliteal Plexus: A Cadaveric Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):725-730. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000675.
PMID: 28937534BACKGROUNDErsig AL, Kleiber C, McCarthy AM, Hanrahan K. Validation of a clinically useful measure of children's state anxiety before medical procedures. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2013 Oct;18(4):311-9. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12042. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
PMID: 24094126BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Pediatric Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2020
First Posted
March 6, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
March 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share