Monthly Replacement Orthokeratology for Myopia Control in Existing Lens Wearers
MR1
Accrued Effect of Orthokeratology for Myopia Control in Children and the Effectiveness of Myopia Control Using an Innovative Orthokeratology Modality. Experiment 1. Effect in Existing Ortho-k Wearers
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The two-year prospective study aims at investigating the benefits of frequent replacement (monthly) orthokeratology lenses in myopia control in terms of effectiveness in control and prevention of ocular complications. The secondary objective will be investigating the use of weekly protein removal system in monthly replacement modality orthokeratology lenses on surface deposit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 11, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2023
CompletedJuly 19, 2022
July 1, 2022
3.2 years
February 29, 2020
July 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Axial elongation in 2 years
Cycloplegic examination of the eyeball length using IOLMaster every 6 monthly
2 years
Back Surface Lens Deposits
Surface deposits will be graded using a 4-point scale: 0=no deposit; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe
Every month up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with serious adverse effects in 2 years
2 years
Study Arms (3)
Monthly replacement orthokeratology without protein removal
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will be required to perform daily cleaning for the monthly replacement orthokeratology lenses
Monthly replacement lenses with weekly protein removal
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will be required to perform both daily cleaning and weekly protein removal for the monthly replacement orthokeratology lenses
Yearly replacement lenses with weekly protein removal
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will be prescribed with orthokeratology lenses which will be replaced at least every 12 months during the study period. They will be required to perform both daily cleaning and weekly protein removal for their lenses.
Interventions
Nightly wear of orthokeratology lenses to correct vision in the daytime
Menicon Progent A+B is a commercially available protein remover for rigid lenses. It has received FDA clearance and been launched in Hong Kong for over a decade. The product contains two separate sterile solutions, one with sodium hypochlorite and the other with potassium bromide. By mixing the two solutions in a special vial, it can clean and remove protein deposits on the lenses. Parents of subjects assigned to use weekly protein remover will be required to soak the cleansed lenses in the solution mixture for not more than 30 mins every week. All lenses must be rinsed thoroughly with saline and cleansed with daily cleaner again before daily disinfection.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 8-15 years
- Have completed a two-year myopia control study using ortho-k
- Normal ocular and general condition and not on medication which may contraindicate ortho-k lens wear
- Pre-ortho-k refractive sphere between -0.75 to -4.00 DS, refractive cylinder ≤ -1.50 DC and anisometropia ≤ -1.00 D
- Best correctable vision better than 0.08 logMAR in the worse eye
- Normal binocular function and accommodative status
You may not qualify if:
- Strabismus at distance or near
- Contraindication for ortho-k lens wear
- Prior history of ocular surgery, trauma, or chronic ocular disease
- Systemic or ocular conditions that may interfere refractive development
- Systemic or ocular conditions that may interfere tear quality and contact lens wear
- Poor response to the use of study lenses
- Poor compliance to test procedures
- Poor compliance to the use of ortho-k lenses (e.g. use of solution, use of lenses)
- Poor compliance to follow-up schedule
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universitylead
- Menicon Co., Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Kowloon, Hong Kong
Related Publications (5)
Lee YC, Wang JH, Chiu CJ. Effect of Orthokeratology on myopia progression: twelve-year results of a retrospective cohort study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0639-4.
PMID: 29216865BACKGROUNDStapleton F, Carnt N. Contact lens-related microbial keratitis: how have epidemiology and genetics helped us with pathogenesis and prophylaxis. Eye (Lond). 2012 Feb;26(2):185-93. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.288. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
PMID: 22134592BACKGROUNDCho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in Orthokeratology (ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Oct 11;53(11):7077-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10565.
PMID: 22969068BACKGROUNDHiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, Takahashi H, Oshika T. Long-term effect of overnight orthokeratology on axial length elongation in childhood myopia: a 5-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jun 22;53(7):3913-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8453.
PMID: 22577080BACKGROUNDCheung SW, Boost MV, Cho P. Pre-treatment observation of axial elongation for evidence-based selection of children in Hong Kong for myopia control. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Aug;42(4):392-398. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
PMID: 30366778BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pauline Cho, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcome assessor was responsible for measuring the axial length and was unaware of the replacement modality of intervention used by the subjects. Another independent examiner will be responsible for grading surface coating from the images taken without disclosure of the information on the cleaning procedures.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2020
First Posted
March 4, 2020
Study Start
March 11, 2020
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 1, 2023
Last Updated
July 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07