Evaluating an Online Adjunctive Support Following Intensive Services (OASIS) Strategy for Youth With Selective Mutism
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study sought to evaluate an innovative post-acute continuation/transition planning treatment strategy that leveraged an in-person intensive treatment followed by online, videoconferencing-based "booster" sessions for youth with selective mutism (SM). Twenty children between the ages of 4 and 10 and their caregivers were scheduled to participate in an in-person intensive group behavioral treatment (IGBT) for SM and subsequently randomized to receive either (a) six, biweekly, hour-long, videoconferencing-delivered booster sessions or (b) no additional treatment for 12 weeks. Due to COVID-19-related physical distancing restrictions, the study team was unable to provide in-person services. Thus, the clinical trial was converted to an open-trial design focused on evaluating remote treatment options (i.e., remotely delivered caregiver training sessions and/or a remotely delivered IGBT) for these families. All families retained in the study have or will participate(d) in assessments at the following time points: Intake (i.e., 4-5 months prior to the remote IGBT); Baseline (i.e., 1 month prior to the IGBT), Post-IGBT (i.e., 2 weeks following the IGBT), and School Year Follow Up (i.e., 16 weeks following the IGBT).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 7, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 7, 2020
CompletedDecember 16, 2020
December 1, 2020
9 months
February 21, 2020
December 14, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale rating at Post-IGBT
The CGI-I Scale (Guy \& Bonato, 1970) is a widely used global improvement measure; improvement is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Independent evaluators masked to family participation/progress during the intensive group behavioral treatment (IGBT) will complete the CGI-I rating. "Treatment Response" is defined as an independent evaluator rated CGI-I rating of 1 or 2 (ratings \>/= 3 represent "Treatment Nonresponse").
Up to 3 weeks after the Intensive Group Behavioral Treatment (IGBT)
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale rating at School Year Follow Up
The CGI-I Scale (Guy \& Bonato, 1970) is a widely used global improvement measure; improvement is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Independent evaluators masked to family participation/progress during the intensive group behavioral treatment (IGBT) and the post-acute strategy will complete the CGI-I rating. "Treatment Response" is defined as an independent evaluator rated CGI-I rating of 1 or 2 (ratings \>/= 3 represent "Treatment Nonresponse").
16-18 weeks after the Intensive Group Behavioral Treatment (IGBT)
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change from Baseline in Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS) Clinical Severity Ratings (CSRs) at Post-IGBT
Up to 3 weeks after the Intensive Group Behavioral Treatment (IGBT)
Change from Baseline in Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS) Clinical Severity Ratings (CSRs) at School Year Follow Up
16-18 weeks after the Intensive Group Behavioral Treatment (IGBT)
Change from Post-IGBT in Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS) Clinical Severity Ratings (CSRs) at School Year Follow Up
16-18 weeks after the Intensive Group Behavioral Treatment (IGBT)
Change from Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) rating at Post-IGBT
Up to 3 weeks after the Intensive Group Behavioral Treatment (IGBT)
Change from Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) rating at School Year Follow Up
16-18 weeks after the Intensive Group Behavioral Treatment (IGBT)
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Remote Caregiver Training
EXPERIMENTALThe Remote Caregiver Training arm consists of participation in a 5-hour, videoconferencing-based caregiver training program.
Remote Caregiver Training + Intensive Treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe Remote Caregiver Training + Intensive Treatment arm consists of participation in a 5-hour, videoconferencing-based caregiving training program, followed by participation in the videoconferencing-based intensive group behavioral treatment program.
Interventions
The remote caregiver training is a 5-hour videoconferencing-based training program that focuses on teaching cognitive behavioral therapy skills to the caregivers of children with selective mutism in a group format across 3 sessions.
The remote IGBT is a 5-day videoconferencing-based treatment program that delivers cognitive behavioral therapy to children and their caregivers in a group format across 2-3 hours per day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Child between the ages of 4-10 years, and his or her caregiver(s)
- Child meets DSM-5 criteria for selective mutism diagnosis
- Child speaks English fluently
You may not qualify if:
- Child is identified as having any psychiatric condition significantly more impairing than selective mutism that requires alternate treatment
- The child is nonverbal with all caregivers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Florida International University
Miami, Florida, 33199, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Natalie Hong, M.S.
Florida International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- "Independent evaluators" assigned to assess outcomes at Post-IGBT and School Year Follow-Up time points will be unfamiliar with families' progress during the IGBT, as well as masked to treatment participation (i.e., whether or not families participated in the remote IGBT).
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2020
First Posted
March 2, 2020
Study Start
March 6, 2020
Primary Completion
December 7, 2020
Study Completion
December 7, 2020
Last Updated
December 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12