NCT04290403

Brief Summary

Urinary incontinence is a common health problem that significantly affects the quality of life of older people. The risk of urinary incontinence is increased in people living with dementia. Many products aid the management of urinary incontinence, with many people choosing to manage incontinence with containment products. The purpose of this study is to examine and compare two containment products - pull ups and style briefs with tapes, in self-management of urinary incontinence in people living with dementia.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 5, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2021

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 22, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 22, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 11, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

December 5, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Urinary IncontinenceDementiaRandomised Cross Over Trialcontinence products

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Successful Toileting Episodes

    Between group change in the proportion of "successful toileting episodes", defined as episodes of independent toileting with pad use and reapplication without leakage, misapplication or failure, between baseline measurement and end of study investigational product.

    56 days

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Number of continence products used

    56 days

  • Number of unintentional leakage

    56 days

  • Number of episodes leading to unintentionally soiled or wet clothing

    56 days

  • Number of laundry episodes

    56 days

  • Number of hours of care partner time

    56 days

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Pull ups

EXPERIMENTAL

Pull-up continence products

Device: Pull Ups

Styled briefs with tapes

EXPERIMENTAL

Styled briefs with tapes

Device: Styled Briefs with tapes

Interventions

Pull UpsDEVICE

Participants will be asked to wear pull-ups continence products for the duration of four weeks

Pull ups

Participants will be asked to wear styled briefs with tapes for the duration of four weeks

Styled briefs with tapes

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Able to toilet independently or independently following prompting or instruction to do so.
  • Independently mobile, with or without walking aids
  • Use of any type of continence produce, for the management of moderate incontinence.
  • Moderate incontinence severity as measured by Incontinence Severity (Sandvik) index.
  • Availability of care partner willing to co-operate and participate in trail procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Need for daily help with dexterity to apply any continence product
  • Waist size or body shape which renders any size of either investigational product inapplicable
  • PLWD unable to indicate the need to toilet
  • PLWD with significant faecal incontinence
  • Permanent residence in nursing home or expected to enter nursing home within two months of trail entry
  • Presence of any other condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator makes PLWD unable to participate in the necessary trail procedures.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Division of Geriatric Medicine, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta Hosp

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 1202204BACKGROUND
  • Hilmer SN, Perera V, Mitchell S, Murnion BP, Dent J, Bajorek B, Matthews S, Rolfson DB. The assessment of frailty in older people in acute care. Australas J Ageing. 2009 Dec;28(4):182-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00367.x.

    PMID: 19951339BACKGROUND
  • Logsdon, R.G., , Gibbons, L.E., McCurry, S.M., Teri, L., Quality of life in Alzheimer's disease: patient and caregiver reports. Journal of mental health and ageing, 1999. 5: p. 21-25.

    BACKGROUND
  • Volz-Sidiropoulou E, Rings T, Wagg AS, Leistner N, Gauggel S, Kirschner-Hermanns R. Development and initial psychometric properties of the 'ICIQ-Cog': a new assessment tool to measure the disease-related impact and care effort associated with incontinence in cognitively impaired adults. BJU Int. 2018 Aug;122(2):309-316. doi: 10.1111/bju.14186. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

    PMID: 29509292BACKGROUND
  • Baker PS, Bodner EV, Allman RM. Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Nov;51(11):1610-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51512.x.

    PMID: 14687391BACKGROUND
  • Gotoh M, Matsukawa Y, Yoshikawa Y, Funahashi Y, Kato M, Hattori R. Impact of urinary incontinence on the psychological burden of family caregivers. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(6):492-6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20675.

    PMID: 19090589BACKGROUND
  • Hérbert, R., Bravo, G., & Préville, M., Reliability, validity, and reference values of the Zarit Burden Interview for assessing informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with dementia. Canadian Journal on Aging, 2000. 19: p. 494-507.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lesen E, Bjorholt I, Ingelgard A, Olson FJ. EXPLORATION AND PREFERENTIAL RANKING OF PATIENT BENEFITS OF MEDICAL DEVICES: A NEW AND GENERIC INSTRUMENT FOR HEALTH ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(4):463-471. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000848. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

    PMID: 29065937BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary IncontinenceDementia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Crossover trial of briefs with tapes versus pull ups for the containment of urinary incontinence
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2019

First Posted

February 28, 2020

Study Start

August 1, 2021

Primary Completion

July 22, 2024

Study Completion

July 22, 2024

Last Updated

May 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations