Study Stopped
Recruitment difficulties
Briefs With Tapes Versus Pull Ups for Urinary Incontinence in Older People With Mild to Moderate Dementia (CUPID)
CUPID
A Randomised Cross Over Trial of Briefs With Tapes Versus Pull Ups for the Containment of Urinary Incontinence in Community Dwelling Older People Living With Mild to Moderate Dementia (CUPID)
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Urinary incontinence is a common health problem that significantly affects the quality of life of older people. The risk of urinary incontinence is increased in people living with dementia. Many products aid the management of urinary incontinence, with many people choosing to manage incontinence with containment products. The purpose of this study is to examine and compare two containment products - pull ups and style briefs with tapes, in self-management of urinary incontinence in people living with dementia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 22, 2024
CompletedMay 11, 2025
May 1, 2025
3 years
December 5, 2019
May 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Successful Toileting Episodes
Between group change in the proportion of "successful toileting episodes", defined as episodes of independent toileting with pad use and reapplication without leakage, misapplication or failure, between baseline measurement and end of study investigational product.
56 days
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Number of continence products used
56 days
Number of unintentional leakage
56 days
Number of episodes leading to unintentionally soiled or wet clothing
56 days
Number of laundry episodes
56 days
Number of hours of care partner time
56 days
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pull ups
EXPERIMENTALPull-up continence products
Styled briefs with tapes
EXPERIMENTALStyled briefs with tapes
Interventions
Participants will be asked to wear pull-ups continence products for the duration of four weeks
Participants will be asked to wear styled briefs with tapes for the duration of four weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to toilet independently or independently following prompting or instruction to do so.
- Independently mobile, with or without walking aids
- Use of any type of continence produce, for the management of moderate incontinence.
- Moderate incontinence severity as measured by Incontinence Severity (Sandvik) index.
- Availability of care partner willing to co-operate and participate in trail procedures
You may not qualify if:
- Need for daily help with dexterity to apply any continence product
- Waist size or body shape which renders any size of either investigational product inapplicable
- PLWD unable to indicate the need to toilet
- PLWD with significant faecal incontinence
- Permanent residence in nursing home or expected to enter nursing home within two months of trail entry
- Presence of any other condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator makes PLWD unable to participate in the necessary trail procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Albertalead
- Essity Hygiene and Health ABcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta Hosp
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P4, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 1202204BACKGROUNDHilmer SN, Perera V, Mitchell S, Murnion BP, Dent J, Bajorek B, Matthews S, Rolfson DB. The assessment of frailty in older people in acute care. Australas J Ageing. 2009 Dec;28(4):182-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00367.x.
PMID: 19951339BACKGROUNDLogsdon, R.G., , Gibbons, L.E., McCurry, S.M., Teri, L., Quality of life in Alzheimer's disease: patient and caregiver reports. Journal of mental health and ageing, 1999. 5: p. 21-25.
BACKGROUNDVolz-Sidiropoulou E, Rings T, Wagg AS, Leistner N, Gauggel S, Kirschner-Hermanns R. Development and initial psychometric properties of the 'ICIQ-Cog': a new assessment tool to measure the disease-related impact and care effort associated with incontinence in cognitively impaired adults. BJU Int. 2018 Aug;122(2):309-316. doi: 10.1111/bju.14186. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
PMID: 29509292BACKGROUNDBaker PS, Bodner EV, Allman RM. Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Nov;51(11):1610-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51512.x.
PMID: 14687391BACKGROUNDGotoh M, Matsukawa Y, Yoshikawa Y, Funahashi Y, Kato M, Hattori R. Impact of urinary incontinence on the psychological burden of family caregivers. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(6):492-6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20675.
PMID: 19090589BACKGROUNDHérbert, R., Bravo, G., & Préville, M., Reliability, validity, and reference values of the Zarit Burden Interview for assessing informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with dementia. Canadian Journal on Aging, 2000. 19: p. 494-507.
BACKGROUNDLesen E, Bjorholt I, Ingelgard A, Olson FJ. EXPLORATION AND PREFERENTIAL RANKING OF PATIENT BENEFITS OF MEDICAL DEVICES: A NEW AND GENERIC INSTRUMENT FOR HEALTH ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(4):463-471. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000848. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
PMID: 29065937BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2019
First Posted
February 28, 2020
Study Start
August 1, 2021
Primary Completion
July 22, 2024
Study Completion
July 22, 2024
Last Updated
May 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share