NCT04290273

Brief Summary

Erythema is a physiological response to an insult on the skin. One such insult is ultraviolet (UV) radiation, with the resultant erythema also known as sunburn. It is a reddening of the skin as a result of increased blood flow to the area. By controlled exposure to UV radiation, a minimal erythema dose (MED) indicative of threshold erythemal sensitivity to the exposure waveband may be determined - this is determined visually by a trained clinician as the dose of light required to cause a just perceptible reddening of the skin. The MED of a specific patient on a specific skin site is an important measurement - it can allow for determination of initial dose in UV phototherapy, provides an indication of background levels of photosensitivity in diagnostic phototesting and may be influenced by exogenous factors, such as photoactive drugs. The erythema response has been measured previously using non-invasive hand-held devices for a variety of UV exposures, including narrow-band (NB-)UVB, UVA and UVA1. Typically, the participant will be exposed in the morning (t = 0h) and have a reading taken immediately after. These readings are assessed visually by a trained clinician, or occasionally reflectance devices are used quantify erythema. The participant will then return at the end of the working day (t \~ 8h) for another reading, and again the next morning for another reading (t \~ 24h). This results in large gaps in the knowledge of erythemal response over time. In this study the investigators aim to characterise the erythema response as a result of UV insult using a wearable erythema device to take continual measurements. This would allow us to more accurately determine the time point of peak erythema, which would inform and potentially change our current practice in reading MEDs. The investigators have previous experience of studies using reflectance devices to measure erythema time course at fixed intervals, however there are still gaps in the knowledge of the time course response of erythema. There is no expected health benefit to participants in this study, however they may gain a better understanding of their responses to ultraviolet light MED testing. Controlled UV exposures are commonplace in our practice in the Photobiology Unit and it is not foreseen that there are any risks to participation in the study. The primary objective in this study is to determine when the peak erythema index occurs in a healthy volunteer group. Success of this outcome will help fill in these gaps in the knowledge about the time course of erythema. The secondary objective is to determine if there is any difference in MED and/or peak erythema if the UV exposure is delivered in the morning vs. the afternoon. The outcomes of the research will be 20 sets (2 per participant) of continuous 48-hour erythema measurements.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 26, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2020

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 15, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

February 26, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

erythemaphotobiologyphotomedicinephototherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measure 2x 48 hour erythema time courses on each participant

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Measure 2 MEDs (minimal erythemal doses) in each participant, at morning and afternoon exposures each

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Morning exposure in week 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have their first week of testing starting in the morning

Diagnostic Test: MED TestDevice: Wearing device

Afternoon exposure in week 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have their first week of testing starting in the afternoon

Diagnostic Test: MED TestDevice: Wearing device

Interventions

MED TestDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Participant is irradiated with several doses of UV light on small areas of the outer thigh. 24 hours later this area is visually inspected for erythema, and the minimal erythemal dose (MED) is determined.

Afternoon exposure in week 1Morning exposure in week 1

Participants wear a portable erythema measurement device for 48 hours. The device shines light on the skin at frequent intervals and measures skin 'redness'. The device is removed by a technician after the 48 hours.

Afternoon exposure in week 1Morning exposure in week 1

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy volunteers. No clinically significant abnormality identified by evaluation of medical history, in particular no evidence of photosensitivity
  • Adult males and females, \>18 years only
  • Capable of giving informed consent
  • Able to understand and adhere to protocol requirements
  • Skin phototype I - III

You may not qualify if:

  • Contact allergy to adhesives tapes
  • Abnormal rash/pigmentation on thighs
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Known to have a light sensitive disorder
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to conceive
  • Skin phototype IV - VI
  • Lack of space on thighs for test procedures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Dolotov LE, Sinichkin YP, Tuchin VV, Utz SR, Altshuler GB, Yaroslavsky IV. Design and evaluation of a novel portable erythema-melanin-meter. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(2):127-35. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10233.

    PMID: 15004824BACKGROUND
  • Man I, McKinlay J, Dawe RS, Ferguson J, Ibbotson SH. An intraindividual comparative study of psoralen-UVA erythema induced by bath 8-methoxypsoralen and 4, 5', 8-trimethylpsoralen. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Jul;49(1):59-64. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2003.419.

    PMID: 12833009BACKGROUND
  • Man I, Dawe RS, Ferguson J, Ibbotson SH. An intraindividual study of the characteristics of erythema induced by bath and oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy and narrowband ultraviolet B. Photochem Photobiol. 2003 Jul;78(1):55-60. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)0782.0.co;2.

    PMID: 12929749BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Erythema

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor (Clinical)

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2020

First Posted

February 28, 2020

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion

November 1, 2024

Study Completion

November 1, 2024

Last Updated

March 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03