NCT04285606

Brief Summary

Notwithstanding the rapid increase in utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), little consensus or high-quality evidence exists regarding optimal rehab methods following the procedure. Our research question is how different rehab methods influence the clinical outcomes following RTSA. This proposal presents a prospective randomized clinical trial where 100 eligible RTSA patients will be randomly assigned to two rehab groups (Short immobilization with patient-directed therapy vs Long immobilization with supervised therapy) at a single institution. Patient-reported outcomes, objective clinical data, and complications will be compared between the groups over a period of 2 years.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 23, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 8, 2020

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 16, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 16, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 21, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

February 23, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Reverse shoulder arthroplastyRehabilitationShoulder arthritisRotator cuff tear arthropathy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • American shoulder and elbow surgeons score at 6 months following surgery

    American shoulder and elbow surgeons score at 6 months; lowest 0 point and highest 100 points; higher scores mean a better outcome

    At 6 months following surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Complications

    During the first 2 years following surgery

Study Arms (2)

Patient-led rehab group

EXPERIMENTAL

Immobilization in arm sling for a short period time followed by patient-led shoulder exercises for rehab following reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Behavioral: Patient-led rehab with short immobilization

Supervised rehab group

NO INTERVENTION

Prolonged immobilization in arm sling followed by supervised physical therapy by therapists for rehab following reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Interventions

Short immobilization followed by patient-led shoulder rehab

Patient-led rehab group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with rotator cuff arthropathy, glenohumeral osteoarthritis with a \> 1.5-cm rotator cuff tear, or massive irreparable rotator cuff tear
  • Have a normal functioning deltoid
  • Have preserved teres minor function (a negative Hornblower's sign)
  • Have failed conservative management for \>3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • younger than 18 years
  • chronic opiate use history
  • fibromyalgia or other conditions that increase susceptibility to pain
  • preoperative stiffness (definition: \< 30 degree passive external rotation, \< 90 degree passive forward elevation), neurologic disorder affecting the ipsilateral upper extremity,
  • RTSA for acute proximal humerus fracture or fracture sequelae (nonunion, malunion)
  • previous arthroplasty, fracture fixation, or open rotator cuff procedures in the same shoulder
  • deltoid dysfunction
  • inflammatory glenohumeral arthritis
  • non-English speaking or unable to understand English for consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Missouri

Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Westermann RW, Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States: A Comparison of National Volume, Patient Demographics, Complications, and Surgical Indications. Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:1-7.

    PMID: 26361437BACKGROUND
  • Jain NB, Yamaguchi K. The contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1905-1912. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.055. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

    PMID: 25304043BACKGROUND
  • Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, Craig EV, Gulotta LV. National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Oct 29.

    PMID: 25440519BACKGROUND
  • Palsis JA, Simpson KN, Matthews JH, Traven S, Eichinger JK, Friedman RJ. Current Trends in the Use of Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States. Orthopedics. 2018 May 1;41(3):e416-e423. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180409-05. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

    PMID: 29658976BACKGROUND
  • Boudreau S, Boudreau ED, Higgins LD, Wilcox RB 3rd. Rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Dec;37(12):734-43. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2562. Epub 2007 Aug 28.

    PMID: 18560182BACKGROUND
  • Bullock GS, Garrigues GE, Ledbetter L, Kennedy J. A Systematic Review of Proposed Rehabilitation Guidelines Following Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 May;49(5):337-346. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8616. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

    PMID: 31021690BACKGROUND
  • Romano AM, Oliva F, Nastrucci G, Casillo P, Di Giunta A, Susanna M, Ascione F. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty patient personalized rehabilitation protocol. Preliminary results according to prognostic groups. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017 Sep 18;7(2):263-270. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.2.263. eCollection 2017 Apr-Jun.

    PMID: 29264337BACKGROUND
  • Wolff AL, Rosenzweig L. Anatomical and biomechanical framework for shoulder arthroplasty rehabilitation. J Hand Ther. 2017 Apr-Jun;30(2):167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.009.

    PMID: 28641735BACKGROUND
  • Kwaees TA, Charalambous CP. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty--minimum age for surgery, postoperative rehabilitation and long term restrictions. A delphi consensus study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):435-9. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1119621.

    PMID: 25404633BACKGROUND
  • Flurin PH, Marczuk Y, Janout M, Wright TW, Zuckerman J, Roche CP. Comparison of outcomes using anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71 Suppl 2:101-7.

    PMID: 24328590BACKGROUND
  • Mulieri PJ, Holcomb JO, Dunning P, Pliner M, Bogle RK, Pupello D, Frankle MA. Is a formal physical therapy program necessary after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun;19(4):570-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.012. Epub 2009 Oct 2.

    PMID: 19800258BACKGROUND
  • Sershon RA, Van Thiel GS, Lin EC, McGill KC, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Romeo AA, Nicholson GP. Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.047. Epub 2013 Oct 12.

    PMID: 24129052BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ChondrocalcinosisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesCrystal Arthropathies

Study Officials

  • Hyunmin M Kim, MD

    University of Missouri-Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2020

First Posted

February 26, 2020

Study Start

July 8, 2020

Primary Completion

November 16, 2022

Study Completion

November 16, 2022

Last Updated

November 21, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No plan to share IPD

Locations