Study Stopped
This study was withdrawn because 1) we did not secure needed funding, and 2) the research question became less important while we were waiting for funding opportunities as a few similar studies got published. We have no plan to pursue this study.
Effect of Postop Rehab Methods on Outcomes Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Effect of Different Postoperative Rehab Methods on Clinical Outcomes Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Study
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Notwithstanding the rapid increase in utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), little consensus or high-quality evidence exists regarding optimal rehab methods following the procedure. Our research question is how different rehab methods influence the clinical outcomes following RTSA. This proposal presents a prospective randomized clinical trial where 100 eligible RTSA patients will be randomly assigned to two rehab groups (Short immobilization with patient-directed therapy vs Long immobilization with supervised therapy) at a single institution. Patient-reported outcomes, objective clinical data, and complications will be compared between the groups over a period of 2 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 8, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2022
CompletedNovember 21, 2022
November 1, 2022
2.4 years
February 23, 2020
November 16, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
American shoulder and elbow surgeons score at 6 months following surgery
American shoulder and elbow surgeons score at 6 months; lowest 0 point and highest 100 points; higher scores mean a better outcome
At 6 months following surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complications
During the first 2 years following surgery
Study Arms (2)
Patient-led rehab group
EXPERIMENTALImmobilization in arm sling for a short period time followed by patient-led shoulder exercises for rehab following reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Supervised rehab group
NO INTERVENTIONProlonged immobilization in arm sling followed by supervised physical therapy by therapists for rehab following reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Interventions
Short immobilization followed by patient-led shoulder rehab
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 years or older
- Diagnosed with rotator cuff arthropathy, glenohumeral osteoarthritis with a \> 1.5-cm rotator cuff tear, or massive irreparable rotator cuff tear
- Have a normal functioning deltoid
- Have preserved teres minor function (a negative Hornblower's sign)
- Have failed conservative management for \>3 months
You may not qualify if:
- younger than 18 years
- chronic opiate use history
- fibromyalgia or other conditions that increase susceptibility to pain
- preoperative stiffness (definition: \< 30 degree passive external rotation, \< 90 degree passive forward elevation), neurologic disorder affecting the ipsilateral upper extremity,
- RTSA for acute proximal humerus fracture or fracture sequelae (nonunion, malunion)
- previous arthroplasty, fracture fixation, or open rotator cuff procedures in the same shoulder
- deltoid dysfunction
- inflammatory glenohumeral arthritis
- non-English speaking or unable to understand English for consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
Related Publications (12)
Westermann RW, Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States: A Comparison of National Volume, Patient Demographics, Complications, and Surgical Indications. Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:1-7.
PMID: 26361437BACKGROUNDJain NB, Yamaguchi K. The contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1905-1912. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.055. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
PMID: 25304043BACKGROUNDSchairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, Craig EV, Gulotta LV. National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
PMID: 25440519BACKGROUNDPalsis JA, Simpson KN, Matthews JH, Traven S, Eichinger JK, Friedman RJ. Current Trends in the Use of Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States. Orthopedics. 2018 May 1;41(3):e416-e423. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180409-05. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
PMID: 29658976BACKGROUNDBoudreau S, Boudreau ED, Higgins LD, Wilcox RB 3rd. Rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Dec;37(12):734-43. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2562. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
PMID: 18560182BACKGROUNDBullock GS, Garrigues GE, Ledbetter L, Kennedy J. A Systematic Review of Proposed Rehabilitation Guidelines Following Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 May;49(5):337-346. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8616. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
PMID: 31021690BACKGROUNDRomano AM, Oliva F, Nastrucci G, Casillo P, Di Giunta A, Susanna M, Ascione F. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty patient personalized rehabilitation protocol. Preliminary results according to prognostic groups. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017 Sep 18;7(2):263-270. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.2.263. eCollection 2017 Apr-Jun.
PMID: 29264337BACKGROUNDWolff AL, Rosenzweig L. Anatomical and biomechanical framework for shoulder arthroplasty rehabilitation. J Hand Ther. 2017 Apr-Jun;30(2):167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.009.
PMID: 28641735BACKGROUNDKwaees TA, Charalambous CP. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty--minimum age for surgery, postoperative rehabilitation and long term restrictions. A delphi consensus study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):435-9. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1119621.
PMID: 25404633BACKGROUNDFlurin PH, Marczuk Y, Janout M, Wright TW, Zuckerman J, Roche CP. Comparison of outcomes using anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71 Suppl 2:101-7.
PMID: 24328590BACKGROUNDMulieri PJ, Holcomb JO, Dunning P, Pliner M, Bogle RK, Pupello D, Frankle MA. Is a formal physical therapy program necessary after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun;19(4):570-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.012. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
PMID: 19800258BACKGROUNDSershon RA, Van Thiel GS, Lin EC, McGill KC, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Romeo AA, Nicholson GP. Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.047. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
PMID: 24129052BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hyunmin M Kim, MD
University of Missouri-Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2020
First Posted
February 26, 2020
Study Start
July 8, 2020
Primary Completion
November 16, 2022
Study Completion
November 16, 2022
Last Updated
November 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share IPD