Oral Gabapentin and Median Nerve Mobilization in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present randomized clinical trial will perform a comparison of the pain reduction effects produced by the application of a non invasive and non pharmacological median nerve neural mobilization (physiotherapy treatment), to those effects produced by Gabapentin and the absence of treatment, in subjects who suffer the signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2020
CompletedDecember 10, 2025
December 1, 2025
4 months
February 23, 2020
December 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Distal upper limb pain
Assessed through the visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS is a psychometric response scale. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.The VAS is the most frequently used method to assess pain intensity. The scale will be displayed as a horizontal 10-cm line labelled at each end by descriptors such as 'no pain' (the minimum and best outcome possible) and 'worse pain ever' (maximum and worst outcome possible). The participant will mark the line to indicate pain severity and it is simply quantified by measuring the distance in centimeters from 0 (no pain) to the patient's marked rating.
Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment) and immediately after the application of the last treatment at 4 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Upper limb function
Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 40 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
Work Status at baseline
Measured immediately before the application of the first treatment
Work Status post treatment
Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
Change in Work Task (Job Type)
Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-17 (TSK-17)
Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
Study Arms (3)
Gabapentin
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will be treated with a maximum of 600 mg per day, subdivided in 2 intakes of 300 mg oral capsules each 12 hours during a time lapse of 4 weeks.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants that belong to the no intervention arm will be assigned to a waiting list to receive treatment. The participants will not receive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome during a time lapse of 4 weeks. After this period of time, participants will begin the best treatment available.
Median nerve neural mobilization
EXPERIMENTALNon pharmaceutical, non invasive, physiotherapy technique; which consists of a passive and repetitive upper limb movement that seeks to induced median nerve gliding and incursions against surrounding connective tissue. Subjects will be treated 5 days per week during a total time lapse of 4 weeks.
Interventions
Manual therapy maneuver performed in the upper limb.
Oral capsule pharmaceutical treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be medically diagnosed with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (with confirmative electrodiagnostic findings).
- Full understanding of written and spoken Spanish (language).
- Participants must freely consent to participate.
- The presence of positive Phalen and Tinel sign.
- The presence of carpal tunnel syndrome signs and symptoms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ciudad Hospitalaria Enrique Tejera
Valencia, Carabobo, 02001, Venezuela
Related Publications (8)
Hesami O, Haghighatzadeh M, Lima BS, Emadi N, Salehi S. The effectiveness of gabapentin and exercises in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Dec 27;14(6):1067-1073. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836420.210. eCollection 2018 Dec.
PMID: 30656171BACKGROUNDTaverner D, Lisbona MP, Segales N, Docampo E, Calvet J, Castro S, Benito P. [Efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome]. Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Mar 22;130(10):371-3. doi: 10.1157/13117468. Spanish.
PMID: 18381028BACKGROUNDDosenovic S, Jelicic Kadic A, Miljanovic M, Biocic M, Boric K, Cavar M, Markovina N, Vucic K, Puljak L. Interventions for Neuropathic Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):643-652. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001998.
PMID: 28731977BACKGROUNDErdemoglu AK. The efficacy and safety of gabapentin in carpal tunnel patients: open label trial. Neurol India. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):300-3. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.53287.
PMID: 19587471BACKGROUNDSanz DR, Solano FU, Lopez DL, Corbalan IS, Morales CR, Lobo CC. Effectiveness of median nerve neural mobilization versus oral ibuprofen treatment in subjects who suffer from cervicobrachial pain: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jun;14(4):871-879. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.70328. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
PMID: 30002707BACKGROUNDRodriguez-Sanz D, Calvo-Lobo C, Unda-Solano F, Sanz-Corbalan I, Romero-Morales C, Lopez-Lopez D. Cervical Lateral Glide Neural Mobilization Is Effective in Treating Cervicobrachial Pain: A Randomized Waiting List Controlled Clinical Trial. Pain Med. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):2492-2503. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx011.
PMID: 28340157BACKGROUNDEren Y, Yavasoglu NG, Comoglu SS. The relationship between QDASH scale and clinical, electrophysiological findings in carpal tunnel syndrome. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Jan;27(1):71-75. doi: 10.17219/acem/67947.
PMID: 29521045BACKGROUNDYucel H, Seyithanoglu H. Choosing the most efficacious scoring method for carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(1):23-9. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.13.0162.
PMID: 25803249BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francisco Unda, PhD
Confederación Gallega de Discapacidad
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Biomedicine Doctorate Program Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2020
First Posted
February 26, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2020
Primary Completion
August 1, 2020
Study Completion
August 10, 2020
Last Updated
December 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share