NCT04285281

Brief Summary

The present randomized clinical trial will perform a comparison of the pain reduction effects produced by the application of a non invasive and non pharmacological median nerve neural mobilization (physiotherapy treatment), to those effects produced by Gabapentin and the absence of treatment, in subjects who suffer the signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
126

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2020

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 23, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 10, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 10, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

February 23, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

GabapentinPain managementPhysiotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Distal upper limb pain

    Assessed through the visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS is a psychometric response scale. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.The VAS is the most frequently used method to assess pain intensity. The scale will be displayed as a horizontal 10-cm line labelled at each end by descriptors such as 'no pain' (the minimum and best outcome possible) and 'worse pain ever' (maximum and worst outcome possible). The participant will mark the line to indicate pain severity and it is simply quantified by measuring the distance in centimeters from 0 (no pain) to the patient's marked rating.

    Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment) and immediately after the application of the last treatment at 4 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Upper limb function

    Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 40 minutes after the application of the last treatment.

  • Work Status at baseline

    Measured immediately before the application of the first treatment

  • Work Status post treatment

    Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.

  • Change in Work Task (Job Type)

    Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.

  • Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-17 (TSK-17)

    Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment.

Study Arms (3)

Gabapentin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will be treated with a maximum of 600 mg per day, subdivided in 2 intakes of 300 mg oral capsules each 12 hours during a time lapse of 4 weeks.

Drug: Gabapentin oral capsules

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Participants that belong to the no intervention arm will be assigned to a waiting list to receive treatment. The participants will not receive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome during a time lapse of 4 weeks. After this period of time, participants will begin the best treatment available.

Median nerve neural mobilization

EXPERIMENTAL

Non pharmaceutical, non invasive, physiotherapy technique; which consists of a passive and repetitive upper limb movement that seeks to induced median nerve gliding and incursions against surrounding connective tissue. Subjects will be treated 5 days per week during a total time lapse of 4 weeks.

Other: Median nerve neural mobilization

Interventions

Manual therapy maneuver performed in the upper limb.

Median nerve neural mobilization

Oral capsule pharmaceutical treatment.

Also known as: Neurontin
Gabapentin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must be medically diagnosed with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (with confirmative electrodiagnostic findings).
  • Full understanding of written and spoken Spanish (language).
  • Participants must freely consent to participate.
  • The presence of positive Phalen and Tinel sign.
  • The presence of carpal tunnel syndrome signs and symptoms

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ciudad Hospitalaria Enrique Tejera

Valencia, Carabobo, 02001, Venezuela

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Hesami O, Haghighatzadeh M, Lima BS, Emadi N, Salehi S. The effectiveness of gabapentin and exercises in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Dec 27;14(6):1067-1073. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836420.210. eCollection 2018 Dec.

    PMID: 30656171BACKGROUND
  • Taverner D, Lisbona MP, Segales N, Docampo E, Calvet J, Castro S, Benito P. [Efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome]. Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Mar 22;130(10):371-3. doi: 10.1157/13117468. Spanish.

    PMID: 18381028BACKGROUND
  • Dosenovic S, Jelicic Kadic A, Miljanovic M, Biocic M, Boric K, Cavar M, Markovina N, Vucic K, Puljak L. Interventions for Neuropathic Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):643-652. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001998.

    PMID: 28731977BACKGROUND
  • Erdemoglu AK. The efficacy and safety of gabapentin in carpal tunnel patients: open label trial. Neurol India. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):300-3. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.53287.

    PMID: 19587471BACKGROUND
  • Sanz DR, Solano FU, Lopez DL, Corbalan IS, Morales CR, Lobo CC. Effectiveness of median nerve neural mobilization versus oral ibuprofen treatment in subjects who suffer from cervicobrachial pain: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jun;14(4):871-879. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.70328. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

    PMID: 30002707BACKGROUND
  • Rodriguez-Sanz D, Calvo-Lobo C, Unda-Solano F, Sanz-Corbalan I, Romero-Morales C, Lopez-Lopez D. Cervical Lateral Glide Neural Mobilization Is Effective in Treating Cervicobrachial Pain: A Randomized Waiting List Controlled Clinical Trial. Pain Med. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):2492-2503. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx011.

    PMID: 28340157BACKGROUND
  • Eren Y, Yavasoglu NG, Comoglu SS. The relationship between QDASH scale and clinical, electrophysiological findings in carpal tunnel syndrome. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Jan;27(1):71-75. doi: 10.17219/acem/67947.

    PMID: 29521045BACKGROUND
  • Yucel H, Seyithanoglu H. Choosing the most efficacious scoring method for carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(1):23-9. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.13.0162.

    PMID: 25803249BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeAgnosia

Interventions

Gabapentin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Median NeuropathyMononeuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNerve Compression SyndromesCumulative Trauma DisordersSprains and StrainsWounds and InjuriesPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AminesOrganic Chemicalsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidAminobutyratesButyratesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsAcids, CarbocyclicCyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Study Officials

  • Francisco Unda, PhD

    Confederación Gallega de Discapacidad

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Biomedicine Doctorate Program Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2020

First Posted

February 26, 2020

Study Start

April 1, 2020

Primary Completion

August 1, 2020

Study Completion

August 10, 2020

Last Updated

December 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations