Effect of Neural Mobilization in Bells Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Bells palsy is a sudden paralysis of half of the facial muscle. The BP is idiopathic and 70% responds well with drug therapy. There are many complementary therapies such as , tapping, electrical stimulation, and massage that adds to the recovery of condition. However, efficacy of neural mobilization in BP is not reported in the scientific literature.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 20, 2021
CompletedJune 23, 2021
June 1, 2021
1.2 years
February 19, 2020
June 17, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sunnybrook facial assessment scale
Sunnybrook facial assessment scale is a scale to assess quantitatively the facial asymmetry. It is a weighted scale based on evaluation of 3 different sub-scale including resting symmetry, the symmetry of voluntary movement, and severity of synkinesis to form one single composite score from 0 to 100. Firstly, the physiotherapist assesses the symmetry of the eye (0-1), cheek (0-2), and mouth (0-1) at rest. (0=normal, the weighted factor of 5). Secondly, the Physiotherapist rates facial movements during 5 standard facial expressions: a brow lift, gentile eye closure, open mouth smile, snarl and lip pucker, on a scale of 1 to 5 (1=no movement, to 5=normal movement). The values are added together and multiplied by 4. In the 3rd step, the severity of synkinesis on a 3-point scale (0=none, to 3=severe) during the 5 expressions as in the 2nd step. The overall score is given by the symmetry value of the voluntary movements minus the resting symmetry and the synkinesis.
1 year
Kinovea© tool for facial movement analysis
As a secondary outcome, we used Kinovea©, a free and open-source tool for movement analysis (Kinovea©, 0.8.15 2006 to 2011; Joan Charmant \& Contrib, Bordeaux, France). From plain video-recordings of movements, the software allows measuring distances and times, manually or using semi-automated tracking to follow points and check live values or trajectories. Facial distances were measured after maximal contractions movements of 3 selected facial muscles: frontalis, orbicularis oris, zygomatic. A symmetry ratio calculated comparing sides of each movement pattern. Subjects had to look straight ahead towards a specified target fixed on the facing wall and it was asked them not to move during video acquisitions. It was asked to keep the head lean the wall, keeping firm it during the 3 tested movements.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Neural Mobilisation Group
EXPERIMENTAL1. Massage therapy. 2. Faradic electrical stimulation. 3. Exercises in front of the mirror. 4. Neural mobilization was applied by gently holding the lower part of the ear between the index finger and thumb. The thumb was placed at the opening of the external auditory meatus and the index finger placed behind the auricle of the ear (Figure 2). The intensity of auricular traction was determined by the patient reporting the level of discomfort. The patient tolerated 3-4 sets of gentle horizontal traction and circular movement 25 times each with 5 seconds rest.
Conservative group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1. Massage therapy consisting of tapping, effleurage and finger and thumb kneading for 15-16 minutes. 2. Faradic electrical stimulation with anode electrode at the back of the neck and cathode over the nerve trunk anterior to the earlobe. The cathodic pen electrode was used to locate the facial nerve trunk for stimulation manually. (Biphasic current, pulse time 300 microseconds, frequency 60 Hz, 20 contractions, Rest 10 seconds). The total treatment time was 15 minutes. 3. Exercises in front of the mirror like raising the eyebrow, clinching the teeth (patient trying to see his clenched teeth in the mirror), smiling and performing other facial expressions for 12-15 minutes.
Interventions
Neural mobilization was applied by gently holding the lower part of the ear between the index finger and thumb. The thumb was placed at the opening of the external auditory meatus and the index finger placed behind the auricle of the ear (Figure 2). The intensity of auricular traction was determined by the patient reporting the level of discomfort. The patient tolerated 3-4 sets of gentle horizontal traction and circular movement 25 times each with 5 seconds rest.
Massage therapy consisting of tapping, effleurage and finger and thumb kneading for 15-16 minutes.
Faradic electrical stimulation with anode electrode at the back of the neck and cathode over the nerve trunk anterior to the earlobe. The cathodic pen electrode was used to locate the facial nerve trunk for stimulation manually. (Biphasic current, pulse time 300 microseconds, frequency 60 Hz, 20 contractions, Rest 10 seconds). The total treatment time was 15 minutes.
Exercises in front of the mirror like raising the eyebrow, clinching the teeth (patient trying to see his clenched teeth in the mirror), smiling and performing other facial expressions for 12-15 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The first episode of Bell's palsy.
- Modified House-Brackmann scale III-IV.
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetic
- Recurrent Bells palsy
- facial palsy
- History of stroke
- Any cerebrovascular accident
- epilepsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
IAMR
Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201206, India
Faizan Kashoo
Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, 15341, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participants, care provider, investigator and outcome assessor will be unaware about the allocation. The therapist performing the initial assessment and the final assessment will be same but will be unaware about the patient assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2020
First Posted
February 21, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion
May 15, 2021
Study Completion
May 20, 2021
Last Updated
June 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06