Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Attention Deficit
Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affect Selective Visual Attention in Children With Left-sided Infantile Hemiplegia? A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
15
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Infantile hemiplegia due to brain injury is associated with poor attention. Left-sided infantile hemiplegia affects the learning and acquisition of new skills. This study is aiming to improve the Selective visual attention (SVA) through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in children with Left-sided infantile hemiplegia .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2020
CompletedFebruary 25, 2020
February 1, 2020
2 years
February 18, 2020
February 24, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Computerized Stroop Color-Word Test
The Computerized Stroop Color-Word Test consists of two phases.The first phase is the preparation phase, where the children are asked to identify the color of a circle on the monitor (red, blue, green, or yellow) and press the corresponding key on the keyboard using the unaffected side. Scores obtained at this stage were not included in the final results. The second phase is the actual test, which consists of 96 colorful words, divided into 48 correctly matched colorful words and 48 incorrectly matched colorful words. The words that appeared on the computer screen were presented in a randomized sequence. Each word appeared on the computer screen for 2000 ms with an 800-ms interval. The children were asked to identify the color of the words regardless of their meanings.
3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
academic practical test
3 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Real tDCS group
EXPERIMENTALThe tDCS applied over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 20 minutes with 1.5 mA intensity
Sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORThe tDCS applied over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 20 minutes with 0 mA intensity.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe normal heathy children age matched undergo the same activity and brain stimulation as the real tDCS group.
Interventions
The tDCS stimulator (ActivaDose II tDCS Device; IOMED Inc., Salt Lake City, USA) is a standardized instrument used and tested in children. Two tDCS electrodes of dimensions 3" x 3" were used for the brain stimulation. The electrodes were inserted into a wet saline sponge.
Five children with LSIH were randomly allocated to this group. All participants received sham tDCS for 3 weeks on alternate days and completed 10 treatment sessions. The sham tDCS followed preparatory procedures similar to that used for the experimental group, except that the device was disconnected after the initial increase of the current. Children usually started the activity without noticing that the device was disconnected. The children were assessed at baseline, during the 5th and 10th sessions, and during a follow-up that was scheduled for 4 months later.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 8-15 years
- Left-sided infantile hemiplegia
- lesion to non-dominant hemisphere
You may not qualify if:
- History of epilepsy
- second stroke
- color blind
- under medication for psychiatric illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The care provider were masked and the pre-post testing was performed by different therapist unaware of the assignment of children.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prinicipal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2020
First Posted
February 20, 2020
Study Start
January 3, 2017
Primary Completion
January 14, 2019
Study Completion
February 15, 2019
Last Updated
February 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02