Efficacy of Shortwave Diathermy in Ulnar Nerve Entrapment on the Elbow
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It was aimed to see if there is any efficacy of short wave diathermy (SWD) in the treatment of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow (UNE). Ulnar nerve entrapment, following carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), is the second most common upper extremity entrapment neuropathy. Ulnar nerve is compressed mostly in elbow region because of its anatomy. Conservative treatment choices are limited in ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy and very few studies about UNE, are available in literature. The aim of this study was researching the efficacy of SWD which is a deep heating modality in treatment of UNE. SWD is used either continuous or pulsed mode. Continuous SWD is used for the purpose of heating. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 61 adult patients, who had been diagnosed with UNE clinically and electrophysiologically, were randomly assigned into two groups. Ten sessions of SWD was applied to the patients in the treatment group as 5 sessions per week for 2 weeks. Ten sessions of placebo SWD was applied to the patients in the control group as 5 times a week, for 2 weeks. All patients in both groups were given elbow splints and were informed to avoid symptom provocating activities. Patients were evaluated at baseline, at the end of the treatment and,1 and 3 months after the treatment. Besides physical examination, quick-DASH (disabilities of arm, shoulder, hand) and SF-36 were used to evaluate activities of daily life, dynamometer was used to evaluate grip force and VAS was used to evaluate pain severity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2020
CompletedFebruary 19, 2020
February 1, 2020
2 months
February 13, 2020
February 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
pain in hand and elbow due to ulnar nerve entrapment
the pain of the participants were measured with VAS (visiual analogy scale). the difference between pain in baseline and 3 months after treatment were compared in order to get the primary outcome measure
3 months
hand function in daily living activities
the progress in function was measured with quick -DASH questionnaire. the baseline measure and 3 months after treatment measures were compared in order to get the primary outcome measure
3 months
Study Arms (2)
treatment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe participants were given 10 sessions of shortwave diathermy treatment and elbow splint and told to avoid symptom provoking activities
control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORthe participants were given 10 sessions of placebo shortwave diathermy treatment (the device was not turned on), elbow splint and told to avoid symtpom provoking activities
Interventions
shortwave diathermy is a deep heating physical therapy agent. It was found efficiaous in carpal tunnel syndrome which is an entrapment neuropathy like ulnar nerve entrapment so it was hypothesised that shortwave diathermy could be an effective treatment method in ulnar nerve entrapment.
shortwave device was not turned on while participants were asked to put their elbow into the device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- UNE Diagnosis Criteria suggested by American Neurology Society (12);
- Ulnar nerve motor conduction velocity lower than 50 m/sec in elbow region
- Elbow region ulnar nerve motor conduction velocity 10 m/sec lower than forearm region
- More than 20% decrease in compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude in above elbow stimulation compared to below elbow
- Evident difference in configuration of above elbow CMAP compared to below elbow
- If 2 of the criteria are positive it is a possible UNE diagnosis, and it is certain UNE diagnosis in case 3 criteria are positive.
You may not qualify if:
- <!-- -->
- cervical radiculopathy
- brachial plexopathy
- ulnar nerve cut and trauma
- sensation deficit in application region
- diabetes mellitus
- polyneuropathy
- wound, burn, scar mark on forearm research region
- presence of implant, prothesis, pin in tissue
- not having well general health
- epilepsy
- presence of intrauterine device
- presence of hearing instrument
- presence of tumor, inflammatory states
- pregnancy or suspect of pregnancy
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sureyyapasa Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Hospital
Istanbul, Maltepe, 34754, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
1.Özçete Z.A, On A.Y. : Ulnar sinir tuzak nöropatileri. TürkFiz Tıp Rehab Derg. 56; 190-5, 2010 2. Robertson C, Saratsiotis J. A review of compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28:345. 3. Piligian G, Herbert R, Hearns M, Dropkin J, Landsbergis P, Cherniack M. Evaluation and management of chronic workrelated musculoskeletal disorders of the distal upper extremity. Am J Ind Med 2000;37:75-93. 4. Sailer SM. The role of splinting and rehabilitation in the treatment of carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes. Hand Clin 1996;12:223-41. 5. Seror P. Nocturnal orthosis: a new treatment of compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. 30 cases. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1994 Oct;150(10):721-7. 6. Hong CZ, Long HA, Kanakamedala RV, Chang YM, Yates L. Splinting and local steroid injection for the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: clinical and electrophysiological evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:573-7. 7. Frasca G, Maggi L, Padua L, Ferrara PE, Granata G, Minciotti I, Marzetti E, Specchia A, Ronconi G, Rabini A, Bertolini C, Piazzini DB. Short-term effects of local microwave hyperthermia on pain and function in patients with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: a double blind randomized sham-controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011 Dec;25(12):1109-18. Epub 2011 Sep 21. 8. Svernlöv B, Larsson M, Rehn K, Adolfsson L. Conservative treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009;34:201. 9. Zlowodzki M, Chan S, Bhandari M, et al. Anterior transposition compared with simple decompression for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(12):2591-2598. 10. Gay JR, Love JG. Diagnosis and treatment of tardy paralysis of the ulnar nerve; based on a study of 100 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1947;29(4):1087-1097. 11. Jeffrey R. Basford, G. David Baxter. Therapeutic Physical Agents. Walter R. Frontera, Joel A. DeLisa( Eds.). Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 5. ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2010 :1698-1700 12. Campbell WW. Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve Suppl 1999;8:S171-205. [Abstract] 13.Svernlöv B, Larsson M, Rehn K, Adolfsson L. Conservative treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34:201. 14. Nakamichi K, Tachibana S, Ida M, Yamamoto S (2009) Patient education for the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:1839-1845 15. Ozkan FU, Saygı EK, Senol S, Kapcı S, Aydeniz B, Aktas I, Gozke E. New treatment alternatives in the ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: ultrasound and low-level laser therapy. Acta Neurol Belg DOI 10.1007/s13760-014-0377-9 16. Incebiyik S, Boyaci A, Tutoglu A. Short-term effectiveness of short-wave diathermy treatment on pain, clinical symptoms, and hand function in patients with mild or moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014 Jul 24. [Epub ahead of print]
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
naciye bilgin badur, doctor
sureyyapasa chest diseases and chest surgery hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- the participants did not know if they were in tratment group or control group. both of the group participants were asked to put their elbow into the shortwave diathermy device and they did not know if the device was turned on or off. the investigator (Naciye Bilgin Badur) did not know the participants group while performing physical examination before and after intervention in control visits. investigator and outcome assessor are the same person who is Naciye Blgin Badur
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2020
First Posted
February 19, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 31, 2013
Study Completion
August 31, 2013
Last Updated
February 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- as soon as the article is pressed as long as the article is in press
- Access Criteria
- via article
statistical analysis and study method and design will be shared