Comparing Bond Strength,Microleakage and Clinical Performance of Three Pit and Fissure Sealants
Comparing the Bond Strength,Microleakage and the Clinical Performance of Three Different Pit and Fissure Sealants (An in Vitro,in Vivo Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is :-
- 1.To evaluate and compare the microleakage of three different fissure sealants(resin-based Clinpro sealant, Moisture tolerant resin-based Embrace WetBond sealant and glass ionomer Fuji Triage sealant) in vitro.
- 2.To evaluate and compare the bond strength of three different fissure sealants(resin-based Clinpro sealant, Moisture tolerant resin-based Embrace WetBond sealant and glass ionomer Fuji Triage sealant) in vitro.
- 3.To clinically evaluate and compare the retention of three different fissure sealants(resin-based Clinpro sealant, Moisture tolerant resin-based Embrace WetBond sealant and glass ionomer-based Fuji Triage sealant).
- 4.To clinically evaluate and compare the caries prevention effect of three different fissure sealants(resin-based Clinpro sealant, Moisture tolerant resin-based Embrace WetBond sealant and glass ionomer-based Fuji Triage sealant).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedFebruary 17, 2020
February 1, 2020
8 months
February 1, 2020
February 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Retention of the sealants
Retention of the sealants will be evaluated according to modified Simon's criteria
6 months
Caries prevention effect of the sealants
Caries prevention effects will be evaluated according to modified Simon's criteria
6 months
Study Arms (3)
Group 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORTeeth in this group will be sealed with clinpro sealant
Group2
EXPERIMENTALTeeth in this group will be sealed with embrace wetbond sealant
Group3
EXPERIMENTALTeeth in this group will be sealed with triage sealant
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First permanent molars fully erupted with deep and retentive fissures,free of caries and free of any periapical radiolucency.
- Males and Females 3- Age group between 6-9 years 4- Medically free 5- High caries risk children
You may not qualify if:
- Medically compromised children
- Uncooperative children.
- Children with abnormalities in occlusion
- children with abnormal oral habits
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of dentistry ain shams university
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sarah E Alieldin
Faculty of dentistry ain shams university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Instructor at pediatric dentistry department faculty of dentistry ain shams university
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2020
First Posted
February 17, 2020
Study Start
July 3, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
February 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02