Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs Oral Triclofos Sodium for EEG in Children With Autism
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often undergo an Electroencephalography (EEG) as part of routine work up. These children present a challenge to successful EEG execution, due to a lack of co-operation, and thus, are often in need of sedation. Historically we have used orally administered, Triclofos Sodium (TFS) - pharmacologically and physiologically similar to chloral hydrate, for sedation in this age group. However success using this drug is limited to approximately 75% in those aged 5 years and above, and possibly lower in this age group when associated with a diagnosis of ASD. The medication is often poorly tolerated by the oral route, and involves patient agitation, spiting (with incomplete drug ingestion), and immediate vomiting upon administration. Recently we have introduced Intra-nasal Dexmedetomidine (IN DEX), with an initial impression of much improved drug acceptance and possibly improved efficacy over TFS. We designed this pilot study, with the aim of comparing efficacy, tolerance of drug administration and adverse events between TFS and IN DEX, with the goal of generating initial results as well as feasibility of recruitment for a larger trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Mar 2020
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 17, 2020
February 1, 2020
2 years
February 13, 2020
February 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Maximal Sedation Depth
Maximal Sedation Depth by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS)
Within 90 minutes
Technician satisfaction from sedation
Technician Ability to complete exam in satisfactory fashion - VAS score
Within 90 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Neurologist satisfaction from EEG motion artifact
Within 7 days
Compliance with IN vs Oral Delivery
Immediate upon administration
Resistance to drug administration (1-10 scale)
Immediate upon administration
Achieving sedation following single dose
Within 45 minutes
Achieving sedation following rescue dose
within 90 minutes
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Dexmedetomidine
EXPERIMENTALIntranasal Dexmedetomidine 3mcg/kg
Triclofos
ACTIVE COMPARATOROral Triclofos Sodium 50mg/kg
Interventions
Patients with Autism will be treated with intranasal Dexmedetomidine as a sedative for EEG
Patients with Autism will be treated with oral Triclofos as a sedative for EEG
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 4-18 yrs referred for an EEG under sedation..
- A Neurologist derived diagnosis of Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
- ASA 1 or 2
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to study drug
- Congenital heart disease, bradycardia \< 60 or know arrhythmia/AV block.
- Vasoactive drugs or treatment for arterial HTN.
- Known Renal dysfunction Creatinine Clearance \< 30% or known Liver dysfunction (Elevated LFT's).
- Concurrent Treatment with drugs know to interact with Dexmedetomidine:
- Atipical Antipsychotics / Phenothiazines
- Tricyclic anti-depressents
- Lacosamide treatment - Antiepileptic.
- PDE V inhibitors (Viagra)
- Beta-blockers
- Phenothiazines
- First generation Anti-histamines
- Significant rhinorrhea.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (18)
Baio J, Wiggins L, Christensen DL, Maenner MJ, Daniels J, Warren Z, Kurzius-Spencer M, Zahorodny W, Robinson Rosenberg C, White T, Durkin MS, Imm P, Nikolaou L, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Lee LC, Harrington R, Lopez M, Fitzgerald RT, Hewitt A, Pettygrove S, Constantino JN, Vehorn A, Shenouda J, Hall-Lande J, Van Naarden Braun K, Dowling NF. Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Apr 27;67(6):1-23. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6706a1.
PMID: 29701730RESULTKeller R, Basta R, Salerno L, Elia M. Autism, epilepsy, and synaptopathies: a not rare association. Neurol Sci. 2017 Aug;38(8):1353-1361. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2974-x. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
PMID: 28455770RESULTThoresen M, Henriksen O, Wannag E, Laegreid L. Does a sedative dose of chloral hydrate modify the EEG of children with epilepsy? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Feb;102(2):152-7. doi: 10.1016/s0921-884x(96)96509-1.
PMID: 9060867RESULTNordt SP, Rangan C, Hardmaslani M, Clark RF, Wendler C, Valente M. Pediatric chloral hydrate poisonings and death following outpatient procedural sedation. J Med Toxicol. 2014 Jun;10(2):219-22. doi: 10.1007/s13181-013-0358-z.
PMID: 24532346RESULTSing K, Erickson T, Amitai Y, Hryhorczuk D. Chloral hydrate toxicity from oral and intravenous administration. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1996;34(1):101-6. doi: 10.3109/15563659609020242.
PMID: 8632499RESULTHirsch IA, Zauder HL. Chloral hydrate: a potential cause of arrhythmias. Anesth Analg. 1986 Jun;65(6):691-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 3706808RESULTGrissinger M. Chloral Hydrate: Is It Still Being Used? Are There Safer Alternatives? P T. 2019 Aug;44(8):444-459.
PMID: 31447530RESULTKaplan E, Daka A, Weissbach A, Kraus D, Kadmon G, Milkh R, Nahum E. Triclofos Sodium for Pediatric Sedation in Non-Painful Neurodiagnostic Studies. Paediatr Drugs. 2019 Oct;21(5):371-378. doi: 10.1007/s40272-019-00346-6.
PMID: 31292919RESULTMason KP, Lubisch N, Robinson F, Roskos R, Epstein MA. Intramuscular dexmedetomidine: an effective route of sedation preserves background activity for pediatric electroencephalograms. J Pediatr. 2012 Nov;161(5):927-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
PMID: 22704249RESULTLiu H, Sun M, Zhang J, Tian Q, Yu Q, Liu Y, Yang F, Li S, Tu S. Determination of the 90% effective dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation during electroencephalography in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Aug;63(7):847-852. doi: 10.1111/aas.13372. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
PMID: 30982953RESULTBaier NM, Mendez SS, Kimm D, Velazquez AE, Schroeder AR. Intranasal dexmedetomidine: an effective sedative agent for electroencephalogram and auditory brain response testing. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Mar;26(3):280-5. doi: 10.1111/pan.12851.
PMID: 26814037RESULTGumus H, Bayram AK, Poyrazoglu HG, Canpolat DG, Per H, Canpolat M, Yildiz K, Kumandas S. Comparison of Effects of Different Dexmedetomidine and Chloral Hydrate Doses Used in Sedation on Electroencephalography in Pediatric Patients. J Child Neurol. 2015 Jul;30(8):983-8. doi: 10.1177/0883073814549582. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
PMID: 25246305RESULTFernandes ML, Oliveira WM, Santos Mdo C, Gomez RS. Sedation for electroencephalography with dexmedetomidine or chloral hydrate: a comparative study on the qualitative and quantitative electroencephalogram pattern. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jan;27(1):21-5. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000077.
PMID: 24823763RESULTKogan A, Katz J, Efrat R, Eidelman LA. Premedication with midazolam in young children: a comparison of four routes of administration. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Oct;12(8):685-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00918.x.
PMID: 12472704RESULTPoonai N, Spohn J, Vandermeer B, Ali S, Bhatt M, Hendrikx S, Trottier ED, Sabhaney V, Shah A, Joubert G, Hartling L. Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Distress in Children: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2020 Jan;145(1):e20191623. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1623.
PMID: 31862730RESULTLi BL, Zhang N, Huang JX, Qiu QQ, Tian H, Ni J, Song XR, Yuen VM, Irwin MG. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children administered either by atomiser or by drops. Anaesthesia. 2016 May;71(5):522-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.13407. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
PMID: 26936022RESULTXie Z, Shen W, Lin J, Xiao L, Liao M, Gan X. Sedation effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine delivered as sprays versus drops on pediatric response to venous cannulation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1126-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
PMID: 28347608RESULTIirola T, Vilo S, Manner T, Aantaa R, Lahtinen M, Scheinin M, Olkkola KT. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):825-31. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1002-y. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
PMID: 21318594RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Pediatric Sedation Services, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2020
First Posted
February 17, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion
March 1, 2022
Study Completion
August 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02