Study Stopped
The AR technology we were using is now out of business and we are trying to use a different device.
Virtual Reality to Reduce Pre-Operative Anxiety
Effectiveness of Virtual Reality to Reduce Pre-Operative Anxiety
1 other identifier
interventional
450
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to test the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) as a non-pharmaceutical intervention to reduce pain and anxiety in children undergoing various procedures in the Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC) at CHLA, as measured by self- and proxy-report.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 6, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 6, 2026
October 27, 2023
October 1, 2023
11 years
February 10, 2020
October 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (17)
VAS anticipatory anxiety measure
The VAS anticipatory anxiety measure is a vertical VAS, anchored with 0 at the bottom indicating the least amount and 10 at the top indicating the greatest amount, in response to the instruction to rate "how nervous, afraid, or worried" they were about the upcoming task. The scale also has color cues, graded from yellow at the bottom to dark red at the top, as well as a neutral face at the bottom and a face showing a negative expression at the top. Prior research used the VAS to rate anticipatory anxiety and pain in children.
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
STAI-C (if elementary or junior high aged), STAI-Y (if in high school or college)
The STAIC is a self-administered measure of anxiety in children. It is comprised of separate, self-report scales for measuring two distinct anxiety concepts: state anxiety (A-State) and trait anxiety (A-Trait). The STAI-C distinguishes between a general proneness to anxious behavior rooted in the personality and anxiety as a fleeting emotional state. The instrument consists of two 20-item scales. In the current study, the measure will be used to measure both state and trait anxiety. The STAI is the validated instrument for measuring anxiety in in elementary and junior high aged children.
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
Child State Anxiety Index (CASI) or Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) if 18 and older
The Childhood Anxiety Sensitivity Index (CASI): CASI is an 18-item scale that measures the tendency to view anxiety-related bodily sensations as dangerous (e.g., ''It scares me when my heart beats fast''). Items are scored on a 3-point scale (none, some, a lot), and total scores are calculated by summing all items. The CASI has demonstrated high internal consistency and adequate test-retest reliability. The CASI correlates well with measures of trait anxiety but also accounts for variance in fear not attributable to trait anxiety measures.
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
The Faces Pain Scale (FPS-R)
Revised is an updated version of the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale depicting no pain as a neutral expression as compared with the smiling face of the original measure. The child is asked to point to the face cartoon that depicts how they are currently feeling because of their pain. Face measures are thought to measure pain intensity, and the Wong-Baker Faces measure has demonstrated good reliability and validity.
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
Child Satisfaction Questionnaire
The child survey is 13-item, Likert-like survey to assess child estimates of pain reduction, fear reduction, decreased behavioral distress, and overall satisfaction; it mirrors the parent survey. There are two versions, one for each treatment condition. Two versions of the survey exist, to account for condition (VR vs. standard of care).
Approximately 5-15 minutes after procedure
CAMPIS-R
The CAMPIS-R is a standardized rating scale that codes videotaped verbal interactions in the pediatric treatment room. The CAMPIS-R codes the subject, speaker, phase of medical procedure, verbal content, affective tone, and to whom vocalizations are directed. Adult vocalizations are coded as coping-promoting (nonprocedural talk or humor directed to the child, commands to engage in coping strategies), distress-promoting (reassuring comments, apologies, giving control to the child, criticism, and empathetic statements), or neutral (humor to adults, nonprocedural talk to adults, child's condition talk, commands for procedural activity, praise, notification of procedure to come, behavioral commands to child, checking child's status).
Peri-procedure
Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (m-YPAS; Kain et al., 1995; Kain et al., 1997)
The YPAS consists of 27 items in five domains of behavior indicating anxiety in young children (Activity, Emotional expressivity, State of arousal, Vocalization and Use of parents). This measure takes approximately 5-10 minutes to complete. The 'adjusted YPAS total score' ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. The YPAS was developed originally to measure the anxiety of children while undergoing induction of anesthesia. Recently, we validated the YPAS against a self-report measure, the State Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (Kain et al., 1997; STAIC). Data Obtained: Standard scores for the anxiety level of children during the perioperative period.
Peri-procedure
Parent Anxiety Scale
The parent is asked to indicate "how nervous, afraid, or worried" they believe their child was about the task on a scale of 1 to 10, from least to most anxious. (See description of Child Anticipatory/Procedural Anxiety)
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
STAI
The STAI is a self-administered measure of anxiety in adults. It is comprised of separate, self-report scales for measuring two distinct anxiety concepts: state anxiety (A-State) and trait anxiety (A-Trait). The STAI-Y distinguishes between a general proneness to anxious behavior rooted in the personality and anxiety as a fleeting emotional state. The instrument consists of two 20-item scales. In the current study, the measure will be used to measure trait and state anxiety. The STAI is the validated instrument for measuring anxiety in working adults, and in young adults in high school and college.
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
Parent Pain Scale
Parents/Caregivers will be asked to report on their child's pain on a faces pain scale of 1 to 6, from least to most pain, during 1) the IV start procedure and 2) the mask induction. (See description of Child Pain - POST)
Approximately 5-15 minutes after procedure
7-item self-report measure of healthcare provider's perceptions about the child's cooperation, pain, distress, and anxiety
The healthcare provider survey is a 7-item Likert-like investigator-developed survey to assess their estimates of pain and anxiety management, cooperation, and satisfaction with the procedure. Healthcare providers are also invited to write comments about the use of VR (if applicable) during the IV placement procedure.
Peri-procedure
6-item self-report measure of healthcare provider's perceptions about the child's cooperation, distress, and anxiety
The healthcare provider survey is a 6-item Likert-like investigator-developed survey to assess their estimates of fear reduction, decreased behavioral distress, and overall satisfaction related to the procedure they just performed with the child/adolescent. Healthcare providers are also asked about sedative use and are invited to write comments about the use of VR (if applicable) during the mask induction procedure.
Peri-procedure
VAS anticipatory anxiety measure
The VAS anticipatory anxiety measure is a vertical VAS, anchored with 0 at the bottom indicating the least amount and 10 at the top indicating the greatest amount, in response to the instruction to rate "how nervous, afraid, or worried" they were about the upcoming task. The scale also has color cues, graded from yellow at the bottom to dark red at the top, as well as a neutral face at the bottom and a face showing a negative expression at the top. Prior research used the VAS to rate anticipatory anxiety and pain in children.
Approximately 5-15 minutes after procedure
STAI-C (if elementary or junior high aged), STAI-Y (if in high school or college)
The STAIC is a self-administered measure of anxiety in children. It is comprised of separate, self-report scales for measuring two distinct anxiety concepts: state anxiety (A-State) and trait anxiety (A-Trait). The STAI-C distinguishes between a general proneness to anxious behavior rooted in the personality and anxiety as a fleeting emotional state. The instrument consists of two 20-item scales. In the current study, the measure will be used to measure both state and trait anxiety. The STAI is the validated instrument for measuring anxiety in in elementary and junior high aged children.
Approximately 5-15 minutes after procedure
The Faces Pain Scale (FPS-R)
Revised is an updated version of the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale depicting no pain as a neutral expression as compared with the smiling face of the original measure. The child is asked to point to the face cartoon that depicts how they are currently feeling because of their pain. Face measures are thought to measure pain intensity, and the Wong-Baker Faces measure has demonstrated good reliability and validity.
Approximately 5-15 minutes after procedure
Parent Anxiety Scale
The parent is asked to indicate "how nervous, afraid, or worried" they believe their child was about the task on a scale of 1 to 10, from least to most anxious. (See description of Child Anticipatory/Procedural Anxiety)
Approximately 5-15 minutes after procedure
STAI
The STAI is a self-administered measure of anxiety in adults. It is comprised of separate, self-report scales for measuring two distinct anxiety concepts: state anxiety (A-State) and trait anxiety (A-Trait). The STAI-Y distinguishes between a general proneness to anxious behavior rooted in the personality and anxiety as a fleeting emotional state. The instrument consists of two 20-item scales. In the current study, the measure will be used to measure trait and state anxiety. The STAI is the validated instrument for measuring anxiety in working adults, and in young adults in high school and college.
Approximately 5-15 minutes after procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Malaise Scale (MS)
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
Blood pressure and heart rate (BP/ HR)
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
Child Presence Questionnaire
Approximately 5-15 minutes after procedure
Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC-2)
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire
Approximately 5-15 minutes after procedure
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Demographic Survey
Approximately 5 minutes to one hour before procedure
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care (No VR) Randomization
NO INTERVENTIONIn the standard of care treatment condition, participants will receive the standard CHLA treatment protocol for IV placement and induction of anesthesia. Current standard of care practices at CHLA for outpatient surgery induction will include the following steps. Children may receive midazolam, parental presence during induction and any other intervention or medication chosen by the HCP. The research team will have no input to the decision regarding the use of any therapy.
VR Randomization
EXPERIMENTALWhen a child is assigned to the VR condition s/he will have the added component of VR distraction during pre-surgical preparation. Children in the VR condition will interact with an immersive 3D virtual environment presented via a HMD (head-mounted display), a helmet with computer screens for each eye. This study will use two HMDs at two possible time points: (1) Prior to and during IV placement, participants will play using the Oculus Go; (2) Prior to and during anesthesia induction, participants will play using the Mira Prism.
Interventions
The Oculus Go is a standalone headset with built-in speakers that runs independently of a smartphone. Via the Oculus Go, participants will engage with BearBlast (developed by AppliedVR). Throughout the world, plush moles play the role of antagonist, standing in for the nuisance and distraction of pain. The VR game is equipped with a head-tracking system, enabling the player to look around the virtual environment. In addition, there is the option to interact with the VR environment using a tap pad located on the side of the helmet. Therefore, the child will be receiving distraction via 3-D visual and auditory sensory, and tactile feedback, thus supplying a multi-sensory immersive experience. The VR HMD runs independently of a smartphone and has active matrix LCDs with high pixel resolution, creating a bright, vibrant color and a quality image.
The Mira Prism is a portable, augmented reality (AR) HMD powered by iPhone. When paired with the iPhone, the Mira Prism goggles can superimpose computer-generated images on the user's view of the real world. Unlike the full immersion of VR, AR allows users to view the outside world while interacting with digital content. In this study, the patient will interact with Magic Mallet (developed by Miney Moe) until falling asleep during the anesthesia induction process. Magic Mallet is a distraction game designed for pain management and communication during procedures. The game automatically adjusts cognitive load for optimal effect for users. Study team iPhones specifically loaded with Magic Mallet, and without cellular capability, will be used with the Mira Prism.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children who are 10-21 years old
- Children who are English speaking (parents may be Spanish English speaking or Spanish speaking)
- Children who are scheduled to undergo outpatient surgery are eligible to participate in this project.
- Children whose health status is American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III will be recruited for this study. ASA status I refers to patients who are normal and healthy with no known systemic disease. ASA status II refers to patients who have mild or well-controlled systemic diseases, such as non-insulin dependent diabetes, upper respiratory conditions, well-controlled asthma or allergies.
- Only children who are in the normal range of development will be recruited for this study. This will be assessed by report from the parents. The rationale for excluding patients with developmental delay is that due to their cognitive impairments, such children react to the stressors of surgery differently than do children without such developmental delay. It is unclear how such children would use the preparation programs and interventions included in this study, and it is likely that their responses on baseline and outcome measures will differ from children of normal developmental parameters.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with health status defined by ASA status IV-V will be excluded from this study. ASA status IV refers to patients with an incapacitating systemic disease that is a constant threat to life. ASA status V patients are considered moribund.
- Children who are taking psychotropic medications that affect emotion modulation will be excluded from this study.
- Children with organic brain syndrome, mental retardation, or other known cognitive/neurological disorders
- Children with visual, auditory, or tactile deficits that would interfere with the ability to complete the experimental tasks or use the technological devices
- Children with a history of seizure disorder.
- Children currently sick with flu-like symptoms or experiencing a headache or earache
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Children's Hospital Los Angeleslead
- AppliedVR Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Related Publications (33)
Perry JN, Hooper VD, Masiongale J. Reduction of preoperative anxiety in pediatric surgery patients using age-appropriate teaching interventions. J Perianesth Nurs. 2012 Apr;27(2):69-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2012.01.003.
PMID: 22443919BACKGROUNDDavidson A, McKenzie I. Distress at induction: prevention and consequences. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;24(3):301-6. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283466b27.
PMID: 21494130BACKGROUNDKain ZN, Mayes LC, O'Connor TZ, Cicchetti DV. Preoperative anxiety in children. Predictors and outcomes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Dec;150(12):1238-45. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170370016002.
PMID: 8953995BACKGROUNDKain Z, Lc M, Cote C, Todres D: The perioperative behavioral stress response in children, Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children. Edited by Anonymous. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 2001, pp 25-37.
BACKGROUNDKain Z, Mayes L, Borestein M, Genevro J: Anxiety in children during the perioperative period, Child Development and Behavioral Pediatrics. Edited by Anonymous. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996, pp 85-103.
BACKGROUNDBurton L, Verma V: Anxiety relating to illness and treatment, Anxiety in Children. Edited by Anonymous. New York, Methuen Croom Helm, 1984, pp 151-172.
BACKGROUNDKain Z, Atlee J: Perioperative psychological trauma in children, Complications in Anesthesiology. Edited by Anonymous. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1999, pp 674-677.
BACKGROUNDKain ZN, Wang SM, Mayes LC, Caramico LA, Hofstadter MB. Distress during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative behavioral outcomes. Anesth Analg. 1999 May;88(5):1042-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199905000-00013.
PMID: 10320165BACKGROUNDKain Z, Sevarino F, Rinder C: The preoperative behavioral stress response: Does it exist? Anesthesiology 1999; 91: A742.
BACKGROUNDKiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R. Psychological influences on surgical recovery. Perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol. 1998 Nov;53(11):1209-18. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.53.11.1209.
PMID: 9830373BACKGROUNDJohnston M. Pre-operative emotional states and post-operative recovery. Adv Psychosom Med. 1986;15:1-22. doi: 10.1159/000411845. No abstract available.
PMID: 3706030BACKGROUNDKain ZN, Sevarino F, Alexander GM, Pincus S, Mayes LC. Preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in women undergoing hysterectomy. A repeated-measures design. J Psychosom Res. 2000 Dec;49(6):417-22. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00189-6.
PMID: 11182434BACKGROUNDMartinez-Urrutia A. Anxiety and pain in surgical patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1975 Aug;43(4):437-42. doi: 10.1037/h0076898. No abstract available.
PMID: 1159142BACKGROUNDWallace LM. Pre-operative state anxiety as a mediator of psychological adjustment to and recovery from surgery. Br J Med Psychol. 1986 Sep;59(3):253-61. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1986.tb02691.x.
PMID: 3768273BACKGROUNDKain ZN. Premedication and parental presence revisited. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001 Jun;14(3):331-7. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200106000-00009.
PMID: 17019112BACKGROUNDKain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, LoDolce ME, Krivutza DM, Wang SM: The Perioperative Behavioral Stress Response in Children. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: A1242.
BACKGROUNDViitanen H, Annila P, Viitanen M, Tarkkila P. Premedication with midazolam delays recovery after ambulatory sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jul;89(1):75-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199907000-00014.
PMID: 10389782BACKGROUNDViitanen H, Annila P, Viitanen M, Yli-Hankala A. Midazolam premedication delays recovery from propofol-induced sevoflurane anesthesia in children 1-3 yr. Can J Anaesth. 1999 Aug;46(8):766-71. doi: 10.1007/BF03013912.
PMID: 10451136BACKGROUNDKain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Krivutza DM, Weinberg ME, Wang SM, Gaal D. Trends in the practice of parental presence during induction of anesthesia and the use of preoperative sedative premedication in the United States, 1995-2002: results of a follow-up national survey. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1252-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111183.38618.d8.
PMID: 15105196BACKGROUNDChow CH, Van Lieshout RJ, Schmidt LA, Dobson KG, Buckley N. Systematic Review: Audiovisual Interventions for Reducing Preoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Elective Surgery. J Pediatr Psychol. 2016 Mar;41(2):182-203. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv094. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
PMID: 26476281BACKGROUNDHoffman HG, Patterson DR, Carrougher GJ, Sharar SR. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based pain control with multiple treatments. Clin J Pain. 2001 Sep;17(3):229-35. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200109000-00007.
PMID: 11587113BACKGROUNDMahrer NE, Gold JI. The use of virtual reality for pain control: a review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009 Apr;13(2):100-9. doi: 10.1007/s11916-009-0019-8.
PMID: 19272275BACKGROUNDMalloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
PMID: 20691523BACKGROUNDReger, G. M., A. A. Rizzo, J. G. Buckwalter, J. Gold, R. Allen, R. Augustine, and E. Mendelowitz.
BACKGROUNDGold JI, Kim SH, Kant AJ, Joseph MH, Rizzo AS. Effectiveness of virtual reality for pediatric pain distraction during i.v. placement. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Apr;9(2):207-12. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.207.
PMID: 16640481BACKGROUNDJeffs D, Dorman D, Brown S, Files A, Graves T, Kirk E, Meredith-Neve S, Sanders J, White B, Swearingen CJ. Effect of virtual reality on adolescent pain during burn wound care. J Burn Care Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):395-408. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000019.
PMID: 24823326BACKGROUNDFaber AW, Patterson DR, Bremer M. Repeated use of immersive virtual reality therapy to control pain during wound dressing changes in pediatric and adult burn patients. J Burn Care Res. 2013 Sep-Oct;34(5):563-8. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182777904.
PMID: 23970314BACKGROUNDKipping B, Rodger S, Miller K, Kimble RM. Virtual reality for acute pain reduction in adolescents undergoing burn wound care: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Burns. 2012 Aug;38(5):650-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.11.010. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
PMID: 22348801BACKGROUNDSchneider SM, Workman ML. Effects of virtual reality on symptom distress in children receiving chemotherapy. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1999;2(2):125-34. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1999.2.125.
PMID: 19178248BACKGROUNDSinha M, Christopher NC, Fenn R, Reeves L. Evaluation of nonpharmacologic methods of pain and anxiety management for laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):1162-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1100.
PMID: 16585311BACKGROUNDMosso-Vazquez JL, Gao K, Wiederhold BK, Wiederhold MD. Virtual reality for pain management in cardiac surgery. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):371-8. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0198.
PMID: 24892200BACKGROUNDDahlquist LM, Weiss KE, Clendaniel LD, Law EF, Ackerman CS, McKenna KD. Effects of videogame distraction using a virtual reality type head-mounted display helmet on cold pressor pain in children. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jun;34(5):574-84. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn023. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
PMID: 18367495BACKGROUNDDahlquist LM, McKenna KD, Jones KK, Dillinger L, Weiss KE, Ackerman CS. Active and passive distraction using a head-mounted display helmet: effects on cold pressor pain in children. Health Psychol. 2007 Nov;26(6):794-801. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.794.
PMID: 18020853BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey I Gold, PhD
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology, Pediatrics, and Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2020
First Posted
February 13, 2020
Study Start
December 4, 2015
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 6, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 6, 2026
Last Updated
October 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share