Prospective Cohort Study on Minimal Invasive Coronary Surgery
PCSMICS
1 other identifier
observational
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
CABG technology is recognized as the preferred treatment, and its major adverse cardiac and cerebral event(MACCE) incidence and mortality are lower than percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). However, the traditional CABG procedure requires sternal incision, large trauma and long recovery period after surgery. How to reduce trauma and treat multiple complex coronary lesions under minimally invasive conditions has become a hot spot. MIDCAB surgery can complete the coronary anastomosis only by a 6-8 cm incision in the left chest. It has been more than ten years since the first literature report in the world, however, due to the technical bottleneck, a unified and standardized surgical procedure has not yet been formed. Some centers are still in the exploratory stage, and internationally Large-scale studies of clinical outcomes (mostly less than 150 cases) have not been reported. Assessing the minimally invasive procedure's safety and effectiveness has become an urgent problem to be solved. At present, our center has completed nearly 200 cases of small incision multi-coronary coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The investigators evaluate the patency of the graft by the postoperative of angiography, the patency of grafts is more than 95%, and there is no statistical difference with conventional OPCABG. On the other hand, focus on the postoperative complications, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACCE and revascularization between the MIDCAB group and conventional surgery during hospitalization. The investigators assume that the early results of this procedure are safe and effective. MIDCAB has a congenital advantage because of its' reduction of the trauma of the thoracotomy and the aesthetics of the incision. Therefore, if a larger sample size study and mid-term follow-up results are obtained, and the conclusion prove that the safety of the small incision surgery and the patency of the grafts are not inferior to conventional surgery. The investigators can consider that minimal invasive coronary surgery(MICS) is a technique worth trying to promote. Through this prospective cohort study, the investigators evaluated the safety of MICS through mid-term follow-up results and asses the efficiency by the results of grafts patency (angiography or CT within 30 days after surgery) and medical outcomes study-short from scores(SF-36), establish the surgical standard and perioperative management method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedNovember 9, 2020
February 1, 2020
3.7 years
May 19, 2019
November 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Rate of 1 years graft occlusion rate
12 months occlusion rate of graft(Evaluate by angiography of CT angiography )
12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
30 days PCS scores
PCS scores calculated from the SF-36
30days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
30 days mental health summary scales(MCS) of SF-36 scores
MCS scores calculated from the SF-36
30days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Rate of 30 days graft occlusion rate
within 30days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
MCS scores
7 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
PCS scores
7 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
Rate of Perioperative MACCE
Within 30 days of the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
Rate of mid-term MACCE incidence
12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
Other Outcomes (8)
Number of Transfusion volume
Within 30 days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
mechanical ventilation time (hours)
Within 30 days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
Rate of wound infection
Within 90 days of the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MICS (Minimal invasive coronary surgery)
Patients undergoing MIDCAB surgery.
OPCABG (thoracotomy off-pump CABG)
Patients undergoing thoracotomy OPCABG surgery
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients are planned for undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
You may qualify if:
- Patients are planned for undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- BMI greater than 28
- trauma, surgical or radiotherapy history of left chest
- EF less than 40%
- Simultaneous other cardiac surgery or planned cardiopulmonary bypass
- Preoperative critical situation: acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and other conditions require emergency surgery. Preoperative nitrate drugs are difficult to control angina and needs IABP implantation.
- Respiratory function: severe hypoxemia (pO2 less than 60 mmHg without Oxygen inhalation), carbon dioxide retention (pCO2 \> 50 mmHg), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (FEV1/forced vital capacity less than 70% and FEV1 less than 50%)
- Aortic lesions: patients with ascending aorta calcification confirmed by preoperative CT
- Peripheral vascular lesions:By the preoperative assessment with ultrasound or CT,LIMA and left subclavian artery stenosis\>70% ,or bilateral femoral artery calcification, stenosis\>50%
- Drug therapy: Preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy (except aspirin and clopidogrel)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
Related Publications (1)
Ding T, Gong Y, Fu Y, Cui Z, Wu S, Yang W, Yang H, Zhao H, Feng H, Zheng H, Meng L, Guo R, Han H, Ling Y. Minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting for treating multivessel coronary disease: A single-center prospective pilot study. JTCVS Open. 2025 May 4;25:96-119. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.030. eCollection 2025 Jun.
PMID: 40631015DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Yunpeng Ling, Doctor
Peking University Third Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yichen Gong, Doctor
Peking University Third Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2019
First Posted
February 13, 2020
Study Start
April 4, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
November 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share