NCT04265625

Brief Summary

Tracheostomy is one of the most frequently performed techniques in intensive care units. For some authors endoscopic guide as part of the percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) might reduces the incidence of serious complications. However, for others, endoscopic guide increases the procedure cost, increases airway pressure and PaCO2 and sometimes requires the presence of another physician. International guidelines conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of bronchoscopy during PT in order to decrease the number of complications. In addition the routine use of endoscopic guide is heterogeneous according the results of six published nation surveys. Extensive randomized trials to compare PT with endoscopic guide and without endoscopic guide are needed in order to clarify this controversial issue. This constitutes the justification of this trial. Hypothesis: Percutaneous tracheotomy performed under endoscopic guide decreases the incidence of perioperative complications of the procedure.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
442

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 7, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 11, 2020

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 28, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 28, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 11, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.1 years

First QC Date

February 5, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 8, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Percutaneous tracheostomyEndoscopic guidanceFiberoptic endoscopic guidanceComplications

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Number of patients with bleeding

    Bleeding with haemodynamic derangement or needing surgical review or transfusion of packed red cells.

    From date of randomization until 24 hours later

  • Number of patients with hypoxemia

    Hypoxemia: Oxygen arterial saturation (SaO2) \< 85% during more than 90 seconds and/or arrhythmia or cardiac arrest related to hypoxemia.

    From date of randomization until 24 hours later

  • Number of patients in whom a loss of airway has ocurred

    Loss of airway: Failure to be able to access the airway \> 30 seconds.

    From randomization until the end of the procedure

  • Number of patients with atelectasis

    Atelectasis: Total or partial lung collapse not present before the technique, evidenced at postoperative control.

    From date of randomization until 24 hours later

  • Number of patients with hypotension

    Hypotension requiring treatment with vasopressors or \>1000 ml of fluids during the procedure.

    From randomization until the end of the procedure

  • Number of patients with barotrauma

    Barotrauma: Subcutaneous emphysema, mediastinal emphysema or pneumothorax related to the technique.

    From date of randomization until 24 hours later

  • Number of patients with posterior tracheal wall injury

    Posterior tracheal wall injury: Injury to membranous trachea by the needle, guide or dilator along with any related consequences (pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, tracheo-esophageal fistula)

    From date of randomization until 24 hours later

  • Number of patients in whom false passage has ocurred

    False passage: Dilatation or insertion of the cannula out of the trachea lumen.

    From randomization until the end of the procedure

  • Number of patients in whom cardiac arrest or death directly related to any complication arising from the technique occurred

    Cardiac arrest or death

    From date of randomization until the ICU discharge

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Peak airway pressure

    From randomization until the end of the procedure

  • Plateau pressure

    From randomization until the end of the procedure

  • Tidal volume

    From randomization until the end of the procedure

  • Arterial Blood Gas

    From randomization until 15 minutes after the procedure

  • Oxygen saturation (SaO2)

    From randomization until the end of the procedure

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Mortality

    From the date of randomization until the hospital discharge

Study Arms (2)

blind tracheotomy

NO INTERVENTION

no endoscopic guidance tracheotomy

endoscopic guidance tracheotomy

EXPERIMENTAL

With endoscopic guidance tracheotomy

Device: endoscopic guidance

Interventions

Percutaneous tracheotomy performed by endoscopic guidance

endoscopic guidance tracheotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over 18 years old requiring tracheotomy due to prolonged mechanical ventilation
  • That Family members or legal representatives have signed the information sheet and informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with increased intracranial pressure according to intracranial pressure monitoring or suspected.
  • Patients who have any absolute or relative contraindication for the percutaneous tracheostomy realization
  • Patients with difficult airway

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Madrid, 28046, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

Madrid, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos

Madrid, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario de Toledo

Toledo, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Anon JM, Arellano MS, Perez-Marquez M, Diaz-Alvarino C, Marquez-Alonso JA, Rodriguez-Pelaez J, Nanwani-Nanwani K, Martin-Pellicer A, Civantos B, Lopez-Fernandez A, Seises I, Garcia-Nerin J, Figueira JC, Casero H, Vejo J, Agrifoglio A, Cachafeiro L, Diaz-Almiron M, Villar J. The role of routine FIBERoptic bronchoscopy monitoring during percutaneous dilatational TRACHeostomy (FIBERTRACH): a study protocol for a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Trials. 2021 Jun 29;22(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05370-x.

    PMID: 34187554BACKGROUND

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Jose Manuel Añon, MD. PhD

    Hospital Universitario La Paz. IdiPAZ

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD,PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2020

First Posted

February 11, 2020

Study Start

December 7, 2019

Primary Completion

December 28, 2024

Study Completion

December 28, 2024

Last Updated

February 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations