Multilevel Family Planning Intervention
Development, Testing and Health Effects of a Multilevel Family Planning Intervention
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study seeks to develop and evaluate a multi-level intervention to satisfy couples' unmet need for family planning in rural Uganda. The study will evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the intervention at increasing contraceptive uptake and continuation and improving intermediate outcomes of knowledge, attitudes, perceived community norms, partner communication and equity among couples in rural Uganda.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 15, 2023
CompletedApril 25, 2024
April 1, 2024
12 months
February 4, 2020
August 21, 2023
April 19, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Couples With Uptake of Any High Efficacy Contraceptive Method
Uptake of any high efficacy contraceptive method. High efficacy contraceptive methods are defined based on efficacy for "typical use" of methods (rather than perfect use), inclusive of pills, injection, intrauterine device, implant, tubal ligation, vasectomy; measured through women's self-report and validated through clinic records and men's self-report
7-months and 10-months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Number of Couples That Discontinued Use of a High Efficacy Contraceptive Method at 10-months Follow-up Among Those That Started Using a Method at 7-months Follow-up
7 and 10 months follow-up
Number of Couples With an Unintended Pregnancy
10-months follow-up
Change in Knowledge of Contraceptives
Baseline, 7 and 10 months follow-up
Change in Family Planning Attitudes
Baseline, 7 and 10 months follow-up
Change in Perceived Family Planning Norms
Baseline, 7 and 10 months follow-up
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Multilevel Family Planning Intervention
EXPERIMENTALA multi-level, community-based intervention delivered in groups of couples to increase contraceptive uptake, reduce discontinuation, and reduce the incidence of unintended pregnancy, and improve intermediate outcomes (knowledge, attitudes, norms, communication, equity).
Time and attention-matched control
ACTIVE COMPARATORA community sanitation intervention delivered in groups of couples to increase at-home and community hygiene practices.
Interventions
The intervention is comprised of community dialogues, or facilitated discussions, aimed to reshape community norms around gender roles, equity, and family size, and critically analyze the social and community influences of "family-wealth" and poverty with the overall goal of reconstructing individual attitudes and group norms on paths to/definitions of a "successful family" inclusive of family planning. Dialogues are enhanced to address knowledge, motivation, self-efficacy, and relationship dynamics, tailored to men and women. Sessions include both gender segregated and integrated groups with couples in the community.
This intervention serves as the attention-matched control. The format and delivery will mirror that of the "Family Health = Family Wealth" intervention (i.e., number, timing, and duration of sessions). The focus of the intervention is on community sanitation and at-home hygiene (hand-washing, food preparation) following an intervention manual that was developed for community groups in Uganda.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being in a relationship and both partners providing written informed consent; women: age 18-40 (or emancipated minor); men: age 18-50; not currently using modern contraceptives and having never used a non-reversible method; one or both partners wanting to prevent pregnancy for at least the next year; living within the selected villages; Luganda speaking.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant; Breastfeeding; Using a modern contraceptive method
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Texas at San Antoniolead
- Makerere Universitycollaborator
- San Diego State Universitycollaborator
- Yale Universitycollaborator
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Katende Villages
Gombe, Butambala, Uganda
Kyabadaza Villages
Gombe, Butambala, Uganda
Related Publications (2)
Sileo KM, Muhumuza C, Tuhebwe D, Munoz S, Wanyenze RK, Kershaw TS, Sekamatte S, Lule H, Kiene SM. "The burden is upon your shoulders to feed and take care of your children, not religion or culture": qualitative evaluation of participatory community dialogues to promote family planning's holistic benefits and reshape community norms on family success in rural Uganda. Contracept Reprod Med. 2024 Jun 4;9(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40834-024-00290-y.
PMID: 38835058DERIVEDSileo KM, Muhumuza C, Sekamatte S, Lule H, Wanyenze RK, Kershaw TS, Kiene SM. The "Family Health = Family Wealth" intervention: study protocol for a pilot quasi-experimental controlled trial of a multi-level, community-based family planning intervention for couples in rural Uganda. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Dec 24;8(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01226-6.
PMID: 36564852DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This was a pilot quasi-experimental controlled trial with the primary aims of establishing acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effects of the intervention on the main and secondary outcomes. Thus, the intervention needs to be tested in a fully powered cluster randomized controlled trial to establish intervention efficacy.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Katelyn Sileo
- Organization
- University of Texas at San Antonio
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katelyn M Sileo, PhD, MPH
University of Texas at San Antonio
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan M Kiene, PhD, MPH
San Diego State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2020
First Posted
February 10, 2020
Study Start
May 14, 2021
Primary Completion
May 3, 2022
Study Completion
March 1, 2023
Last Updated
April 25, 2024
Results First Posted
November 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- 3 years after study completion for researchers and students within the collaborating institutions and 5 years after study completion for those outside of the collaborating institutions upon request
- Access Criteria
- Upon request from the PI
Quantitative data collected in this trial (baseline, follow-up assessments) will be made available, under the following provisions: (1)The data will be fully de-identified; (2) Access to the data will be made available first to researchers and their students at the four collaborating institutions (within 3 years of study completion): The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Diego State University, the Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH), and Yale University; 4) 5 years after study completion, data will be made available to those requesting access outside of the four requesting institutions. Qualitative data collected as part of this trial will not be made available, as it is difficult to fully de-identify and to interpret without knowledge of the context.