The Effect of Play on Social and Motor Skills of Children With ASD
A Multisystem, Multimodal Intervention for Children With ASD
2 other identifiers
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators will compare effects of two types of 8-weeklong interventions: a) multimodal or b) general movement to facilitate social communication and motor skills of school-age children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Recently, the investigators have identified cortical dysfunction patterns as markers of imitation/interpersonal synchrony difficulties in children with ASD using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. In this project, the investigators want to validate whether cortical markers can determine treatment responders and if such markers are sensitive to training-related changes. Following training, the investigators expect to see a variety of behavioral and neural changes in both groups. If the study aims are achieved, the investigators will validate the use of cortical markers as a treatment response measure. This research will build evidence for the use of various movement interventions for school-age children with ASD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 21, 2023
CompletedNovember 21, 2023
November 1, 2023
2 years
January 24, 2020
June 12, 2023
November 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition (BOT-2)
The 3 gross motor coordination and 1 fine manual control composite of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition (BOT-2) were administered as a measure of gross and fine motor coordination at each time point. BOT-2 standard scores will be reported for each composite: (i) body coordination composite comprises of balance and bilateral coordination, (ii) the strength/agility composite is comprised of running speed and agility, (iii) upper-limb coordination composite is comprised of upper-limb coordination and manual dexterity, and (iv) the fine manual control composite is comprised of fine motor precision and integration. Standard composite scores on the BOT-2 have a Mean=50 and a standard deviation (SD)=10 for body coordination, strength \& agility, manual coordination and fine motor coordination composite domains. Higher standard scores represent a better outcome. Note there are no T-scores as such for BOT-2; the term often used is a standard BOT composite score.
Baseline to Post-test after 8 weeks of intervention, Baseline to Follow-up testing after 8 weeks from post-test
Praxis Subtests of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Testing (SIPT) - Postural Praxis Error
The praxis subtests of Sensory Integration and Praxis Testing (SIPT) are standardized and normed measures of examining motor coordination, sensory integration, and praxis. Specifically, the investigators are planning to use items from subtest of postural praxis subtest. The praxis subtests will examine a child's ability to generalize the imitation skills to novel actions involved in the SIPT postural praxis subtest. This test provides the number of errors per action copied and a total number of errors. There is no fixed range as such but the scores could range from 0 to 100. There are no T or standard scores available for this subtest. Higher number of errors indicates a poor outcome.
Baseline to Post-test after 8 weeks of intervention, Baseline to Follow-up testing after 8 weeks from post-test
Flanker Task of Executive Functioning (EF)
In the EF task data will be collected. Children will completed the response inhibition task using the Flanker test. This involves making decisions about where a group of fish shown on the screen are looking (right or left). Reaction time in msec were calculated for each response and averaged across trials. Lower values of reaction times indicate faster or better responses.
Baseline to Post-test after 8 weeks of intervention, Baseline to Follow-up testing after 8 weeks from post-test
Synchrony Errors During the Rhythmic Synchrony Task
In the rhythmic synchrony task children will perform social drumming (i.e., move in synchrony with an adult as the child follows the adult's drumming motions). Synchrony errors were coded when the child was not matching with the adult for each movement cycle. Higher number of errors indicate a poor outcome. This was an experimental paradigm, and not a standardize measure. Hence, there are no T-scores to report.
Baseline to Post-test after 8 weeks of intervention, Baseline to Follow-up testing after 8 weeks from post-test
Number of Prosocial Behaviors
In a structured play task, the tester assessed a child's ability to engage in prosocial behaviors across multiple helping bids to engage the child in helping behaviors (e.g., clean up of pennies, peg, blocks, cards, and dropped pencils). There are no T or standard scores available for this behavioral measure (not a standardized test). Higher number indicates more prosocial behaviors by the child during the helping bids.
Baseline to Post-test after 8 weeks of intervention, Baseline to Follow-up testing after 8 weeks from post-test
Secondary Outcomes (4)
2-Minute Walk Test
Baseline to Post-test after 8 weeks of intervention, Baseline to Follow-up testing after 8 weeks from post-test
Timed-Up & Go Test (TUG)
Baseline to Post-test after 8 weeks of intervention, Baseline to Follow-up testing after 8 weeks from post-test
Developmental Coordination Disorder-Questionnaire
Baseline to Post-test after 8 weeks of intervention, Baseline to Follow-up testing after 8 weeks from post-test
Sensory Processing Measure (SPM)
Baseline to Post-test after 8 weeks of intervention, Baseline to Follow-up testing after 8 weeks from post-test
Other Outcomes (3)
Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ)
In the screening phase after initial contact with researchers
Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales (VABS)
In the baseline period
Social Responsiveness Scale-Second Edition (SRS-2)
Only completed once at pretest.
Study Arms (3)
Multimodal
EXPERIMENTALEach child will receive 16 training sessions (8 weeks of training @ 2 sessions per week, approximately 30-45 minutes of interaction time per session) from an expert trainer and parent guidance using telehealth or face-to-face interactions. Within each session, the child will engage in tasks requiring interpersonal synchrony, multilimb coordination (asymmetrical and ipsi/contralateral motions), and balance. Based on feasibility, parents will be given appropriate supplies and trained to promote similar activities at home 1-2 days/week.
General Movement
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach child will receive 16 training sessions (8 weeks of training @ 2 sessions per week, approximately 30-45 minutes of interaction time per session) from an expert trainer and parent guidance using telehealth or face-to-face interactions. Within each session, the child will engage in structured physical activity focused on flexibility, strength, and endurance. Based on feasibility, parents will be given appropriate supplies and trained to promote similar activities at home 1-2 days/week.
Standard of Care
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach child will receive 16 training sessions (8 weeks of training @ 2 sessions per week, approximately 30-45 minutes of interaction time per session) from an expert trainer and parent guidance using telehealth or face-to-face interactions. Within each session, the child will engage in seated play focused on reading, building, and art-craft activities. Based on feasibility, parents will be given appropriate supplies and trained to promote similar activities at home 1-2 days/week.
Interventions
Multimodal intervention will involve hello songs, warm up mainly involve sensory and stretching games, music time involves playing instruments, moving game involves use of music or songs to move the whole body, yoga involves themes/songs to perform yoga poses, and good bye involves a goodbye song and reflections about the session. In all movement conditions, trainers emphasize complex and multilimb coordination (asymmetrical and ipsi/contralateral movements) and balance.
The general exercise group will begin with hello games/set up and end with reflections and cleanup. Children will engage in limb and body warmup routines, specific strengthening exercises (single-joint/single-limb/symmetrical), moderate intensity endurance exercises involving various obstacle courses, and a cool down routine.
The seated play group will also begin with hello/icebreaker games and end with goodbye and cleanup. In between, they will read books and review the story line and overall message and engage in fine-motor activities involving building supplies and art-craft.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) between 5 and 15 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Significant hearing or vision impairment
- Significant behavioral problems
- Significant medical (cardiovascular or respiratory), orthopedic, or surgical problems that prevent study participation.
- History of seizures.
- Significant mobility problems that prevent study participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Delawarelead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Delaware
Newark, Delaware, 19713, United States
Related Publications (1)
Su WC, Cleffi C, Srinivasan S, Bhat A. A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy, Fidelity, Acceptability, and Feasibility of Telehealth and Face-to-Face Creative Movement Interventions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Telemed Rep. 2024 Mar 21;5(1):67-77. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0061. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38558955DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anjana Bhat, Study PI
- Organization
- University of Delaware
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anjana N Bhat, PhD
University of Delaware
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2020
First Posted
February 6, 2020
Study Start
June 4, 2020
Primary Completion
May 31, 2022
Study Completion
May 31, 2022
Last Updated
November 21, 2023
Results First Posted
November 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share