NCT04258007

Brief Summary

This study hypothesizes that Sugammadex may has more appropriate recovery profile than neostigmine in pediatric cardiac patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. In pediatric cardiac patients, clear and rapid recovery (fast-tracking) is required to maintain hemodynamic within the normal physiological values which may be saved by sugammadex

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 27, 2020

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 28, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 6, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 10, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 18, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 16, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

January 28, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Reversal efficacy

    Mean time in minutes from start of sugammadex or neostigmine administration to recovery of T4/T1 ratio to 0.9 was assessed by applying repetitive train of four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds and assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. Nerve stimulation continued until the ratio of the magnitude of the fourth twitch (T4) to first twitch (T1) reached at least 0.9

    90 minutes after endotracheal extubation

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Heart rate

    assessed basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal

  • Mean arterial blood pressure

    basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal

  • Diastolic arterial blood pressure

    basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal

  • Peripheral oxygen saturation

    basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation , just before reversal, at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal

  • vomiting

    for 24 hour after sugammadex or neostigmine administration

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Reversal Neostigmine

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization will receive a combination of 0.02 mg/ kg atropine and 0.04 mg/ kg neostigmine following observing the second response on stimulating the ulnar nerve on the TOF watch

Drug: Reversal Neostigmine

Reversal Sugammadex

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization will receive sugammadex 4 mg/ kg when the T2 is observed on the TOF watch

Drug: Reversal Sugammadex

Interventions

Patients will receive 0.02 mg/ kg atropine and 0.04 mg/ kg neostigmine following observing the second response on stimulating the ulnar nerve on the TOF watch

Also known as: PROSTIGMIN®
Reversal Neostigmine

Interventional Arm Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization will receive sugammadex 4 mg/ kg when the T2 is observed on the TOF watch

Also known as: BRIDION®
Reversal Sugammadex

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Day - 2 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I-III

You may not qualify if:

  • Legal guardian refusal.
  • Any patients with known drug hypersensitivity.
  • Kidney failure.
  • Liver failure.
  • Diseases affecting the neuromuscular junction.
  • A history of malignant hyperthermia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mansoura University

Al Mansurah, DK, 050, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

NeostigmineSugammadex

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Phenylammonium CompoundsQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsAminesOrganic ChemicalsOnium Compoundsgamma-CyclodextrinsCyclodextrinsMacrocyclic CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsDextrinsStarchGlucansPolysaccharidesCarbohydrates

Study Officials

  • Sherif A Mousa, MD

    Professor of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Amgad A Zaghloul, MD

    Associate Professor of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
Double blind (Participant, Care Provider)
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2020

First Posted

February 6, 2020

Study Start

January 27, 2020

Primary Completion

November 10, 2020

Study Completion

November 18, 2020

Last Updated

June 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Following publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
forever
Access Criteria
ahmed.refaat.rezk@gmail.com

Locations