Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine in Pediatric Less Than Two Years Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization
Recovery Profile of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization: a Randomized Double-blind Study
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study hypothesizes that Sugammadex may has more appropriate recovery profile than neostigmine in pediatric cardiac patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. In pediatric cardiac patients, clear and rapid recovery (fast-tracking) is required to maintain hemodynamic within the normal physiological values which may be saved by sugammadex
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 18, 2020
CompletedJune 16, 2021
June 1, 2021
10 months
January 28, 2020
June 14, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reversal efficacy
Mean time in minutes from start of sugammadex or neostigmine administration to recovery of T4/T1 ratio to 0.9 was assessed by applying repetitive train of four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds and assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. Nerve stimulation continued until the ratio of the magnitude of the fourth twitch (T4) to first twitch (T1) reached at least 0.9
90 minutes after endotracheal extubation
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Heart rate
assessed basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
Mean arterial blood pressure
basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
Diastolic arterial blood pressure
basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
Peripheral oxygen saturation
basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation , just before reversal, at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
vomiting
for 24 hour after sugammadex or neostigmine administration
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Reversal Neostigmine
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients undergoing cardiac catheterization will receive a combination of 0.02 mg/ kg atropine and 0.04 mg/ kg neostigmine following observing the second response on stimulating the ulnar nerve on the TOF watch
Reversal Sugammadex
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergoing cardiac catheterization will receive sugammadex 4 mg/ kg when the T2 is observed on the TOF watch
Interventions
Patients will receive 0.02 mg/ kg atropine and 0.04 mg/ kg neostigmine following observing the second response on stimulating the ulnar nerve on the TOF watch
Interventional Arm Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization will receive sugammadex 4 mg/ kg when the T2 is observed on the TOF watch
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Legal guardian refusal.
- Any patients with known drug hypersensitivity.
- Kidney failure.
- Liver failure.
- Diseases affecting the neuromuscular junction.
- A history of malignant hyperthermia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, DK, 050, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sherif A Mousa, MD
Professor of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Amgad A Zaghloul, MD
Associate Professor of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Double blind (Participant, Care Provider)
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2020
First Posted
February 6, 2020
Study Start
January 27, 2020
Primary Completion
November 10, 2020
Study Completion
November 18, 2020
Last Updated
June 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- forever
- Access Criteria
- ahmed.refaat.rezk@gmail.com
Following publication