Manual Therapy, Kinesiotape and Strength Training in Soccer Players With Recurrent Ankle Sprains
Effectiveness of Manual Therapy, Kinesiotape and Strength Training in Improving the Range of Ankle Movement, Stability, Strength and Pain in Soccer Players With Recurrent Ankle Sprains
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction. The ankle sprain is one of the most prevalent injuries in soccer players. The muscle strength deficit is one of the variables that can most influence the development of a sprain. It has been indicated how the Kinesiotape and the myofascial direct induction technique can improve functionality. Aim. To verify the effectiveness of the KinesioTape and the myofascial technique combined with strength training, in the reduction of pain, Rom increase, stability and strength in subjects who suffered ankle sprains. Study design. Randomized, multicentric clinical study with follow-up. Methods. A random assignment of the subjects recruited in two study groups will be carried out: experimental and control group. The treatment will last 4 weeks, with 2 weekly sessions, of 50-60 minutes. The intervention includes the application of kinesiotape and myofascial treatment with strength training. The study variables will be pain (VAS), mobility (goniometer), stability (ProKin balance) and strength (MicroFet). A descriptive statistical analysis will be carried out calculating the main statistical characteristics. By means of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test the distribution of the normality of the sample will be assessed. With the t-student test for related samples we will calculate the difference of means between the evaluations made in both groups. With an ANOVA of repeated measures we will calculate the intra and intersubject effect. The calculation of the effect size will be done with the Cohen formula. Expected results. Improvement in stability, increase in range of motion, decrease in pain and increase in strength.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 10, 2020
CompletedSeptember 2, 2021
September 1, 2021
3 months
February 2, 2020
September 1, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline ankle range of motion after treatment and at 1 month
It will be done with a digital goniometer (Get my Rom model - Iphone 5 - Interactive Medical Productions). The movements of dorsal and plantar flexion, inversion and eversion will be measured. In measuring dorsal and plantar flexion, the goniometer will be placed on the 5th metatarsal. In measuring the inversion and eversion, the goniometer will be placed in the plantar part in line with the metatarsals. The unit of measure is the degree.
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline isometric ankle strength after treatment and at 1 month
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
Change from baseline stability after treatment and at 1 month
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
Change from baseline ankle joint pain perception after treatment and at 1 month
Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visit
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention by kinesiotape will be done with the player in supine position with the foot in dorsal flexion, anchoring the strip below the sole of the foot without tension, adding 50-70% tension until internal and external malleolus, and ending without tension. Another strip will be placed under the external malleolus, anchoring the bandage and following the talus (50-70% tension), leaving the scaphoid bulge free, surrounding the plant without tension and leaving the 5th metatarsal free. The bandage continues on the peroneal-astragalin ligament and the external malleolus (50-70% tension), until the tendon without tension. In the end we will surround the internal malleolus to the Achilles tendon without tension, ending with the same tension in the external malleolus and the neck of the talus. The myofascial technique and strength training will be the same in both groups.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe myofascial technique will be carried out by positioning the caudal hand of the physiotherapist in the astragalin and heel region, and the cranial hand in the middle foot. With a tibiotarsal traction, the foot will be everted, performing a shear in the astragalin zone, using a combined and slow technique. All players will warm up for 10 minutes on tape, at a speed of 7 km / h without inclination. The strength work was carried out with an isoinertial machine (Space Whell) with intervalic methodology: 20 "-10", with 4 series and doing three exercises: Squat, Lunges and Deadlift. One minute breaks will be made between sets.
Interventions
Myofascial technique intervention of the subastragalar joint, kinesiotape and eccentric training with isoinercial machine. The intervention lasted 4 weeks. Each treatment session lasted 50 minutes, with 2 sessions a week. Between training sessions, the indicated break was 48 hours.
Myofascial technique of the subastragalar joint and eccentric training with isoinercial machine. The intervention lasted 4 weeks. Each treatment session lasted 50 minutes, with 2 sessions a week. Between training sessions, the indicated break was 48 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male soccer players
- to 35 years old
- History of ankle sprain recurrences
You may not qualify if:
- Players who suffered a sprain in the previous month
- Footballers who were taking anti-inflammatory drugs
- Players undergoing another type of physiotherapy treatment at the time of the study
- Soccer players who do not sign the informed consent document.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
European University of Madrid
Madrid, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso, PhD
Universidad Europea de Madrid
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2020
First Posted
February 6, 2020
Study Start
February 10, 2020
Primary Completion
April 30, 2020
Study Completion
May 10, 2020
Last Updated
September 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09