NCT04257071

Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial of a cohort of adult multiple sclerosis (MS) patients visiting an outpatient neurology clinic. Sixty participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention arm or a control arm and will be followed for three months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable multiple-sclerosis

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 4, 2020

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2020

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 3, 2020

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 18, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

February 4, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 16, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Financial toxicityFinancial burdenFinancial distressMedical expenseOut of Pocket costCost communicationCost optimizationPrice transparencyFinancial navigation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Patient satisfaction with their experience with the OOP cost discussion and financial counselors is assessed with a 14-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Participants report how much they agree with each statement on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 14 to 70 where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the financial counselor experiences.

    Month 3

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Percentage of Patients Participating in Cost Conversations

    Month 3

  • Minutes of Patient Engagement in Cost Conversations

    Month 3

  • Patient Adherence to Cost Optimization Program

    Month 3

  • Change in Utilization of Financial Supportive Services

    Baseline, Month 3

  • Accuracy of OOP Cost Estimates

    Month 3

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) Questionnaire Score

    Baseline, Month 3

  • Change in Cost-related Care Non-adherence

    Baseline, Month 3

  • Change in Financial Hardship

    Baseline, Month 3

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to the usual care study arm will receive the usual care for their MS.

Behavioral: Usual Care

OOP Cost Communication and Optimization

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this study arm in addition to usual care, will receive a personalized discussion of their OOP cost estimates for treatment obtained through an online price transparency tool, personalized analysis of expenses by financial counselor, and enrollment in any cost optimization opportunities for which they are eligible using a comprehensive financial navigation program.

Behavioral: Usual CareBehavioral: OOP Cost Communication and Optimization

Interventions

Usual CareBEHAVIORAL

The usual care for MS involves standard patient neurology visits and encounters with pharmacists, financial counselors and social workers if patients need any financial assistance with medication or other expenses.

OOP Cost Communication and OptimizationUsual Care

OOP Cost Communication and Optimization includes personalized discussion of OOP cost estimates for treatment plan obtained through an online price transparency tool, personalized analysis of patients' expenses by financial counselor, and patient enrollment in any cost optimization opportunities for which patient is eligible using a comprehensive financial navigation program.

OOP Cost Communication and Optimization

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • known diagnosis of MS as documented in the electronic medical record by a neurologist based on clinical and imaging findings
  • a prescription for DMTs as medication
  • not enrolled in a clinical trial that covers the cost of DMT
  • have capacity to consent

You may not qualify if:

  • plan to receive treatment elsewhere
  • concurrent diagnosis of primary cancers (except for non-melanoma skin cancer)
  • unable to read and speak English.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Neurology Clinic, 12 Executive Park Drive

Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Owens GM. Economic burden of multiple sclerosis and the role of managed sare organizations in multiple sclerosis management. Am J Manag Care. 2016 Jun;22(6 Suppl):s151-8.

    PMID: 27356024BACKGROUND
  • Adelman G, Rane SG, Villa KF. The cost burden of multiple sclerosis in the United States: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Econ. 2013;16(5):639-47. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.778268. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

    PMID: 23425293BACKGROUND
  • Himmelstein DU, Thorne D, Warren E, Woolhandler S. Medical bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: results of a national study. Am J Med. 2009 Aug;122(8):741-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.012. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

    PMID: 19501347BACKGROUND
  • Hartung DM, Bourdette DN, Ahmed SM, Whitham RH. The cost of multiple sclerosis drugs in the US and the pharmaceutical industry: Too big to fail? Neurology. 2015 May 26;84(21):2185-92. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001608. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

    PMID: 25911108BACKGROUND
  • Rumrill PD Jr, Roessler RT, McMahon BT, Hennessey ML, Neath J. Gender as a differential indicator of the employment discrimination experiences of Americans with multiple sclerosis. Work. 2007;29(4):303-11.

    PMID: 18057570BACKGROUND
  • de Souza JA, Yap B, Ratain MJ, Daugherty C. User beware: we need more science and less art when measuring financial toxicity in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 20;33(12):1414-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4986. Epub 2015 Mar 2. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25732158BACKGROUND
  • Altice CK, Banegas MP, Tucker-Seeley RD, Yabroff KR. Financial Hardships Experienced by Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 20;109(2):djw205. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw205. Print 2017 Feb.

    PMID: 27754926BACKGROUND
  • de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Hlubocky FJ, Wroblewski K, Ratain MJ, Cella D, Daugherty CK. The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer: The COST measure. Cancer. 2014 Oct 15;120(20):3245-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28814. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

    PMID: 24954526BACKGROUND
  • de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Wroblewski K, Blinder V, Araujo FS, Hlubocky FJ, Nicholas LH, O'Connor JM, Brockstein B, Ratain MJ, Daugherty CK, Cella D. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):476-484. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30369. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

    PMID: 27716900BACKGROUND
  • Streeter SB, Schwartzberg L, Husain N, Johnsrud M. Patient and plan characteristics affecting abandonment of oral oncolytic prescriptions. J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3 Suppl):46s-51s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000316.

    PMID: 21886519BACKGROUND
  • Lizan L, Comellas M, Paz S, Poveda JL, Meletiche DM, Polanco C. Treatment adherence and other patient-reported outcomes as cost determinants in multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Dec 4;8:1653-64. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S67253. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25525341BACKGROUND
  • Benito-Leon J. Multiple sclerosis: is prevalence rising and if so why? Neuroepidemiology. 2011;37(3-4):236-7. doi: 10.1159/000334606. Epub 2011 Nov 30. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22133765BACKGROUND
  • Jensen S, Given B. Fatigue affecting family caregivers of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 1993 Nov;1(6):321-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00364970.

    PMID: 8156250BACKGROUND
  • Shankaran V, Leahy T, Steelquist J, Watabayashi K, Linden H, Ramsey S, Schwartz N, Kreizenbeck K, Nelson J, Balch A, Singleton E, Gallagher K, Overstreet K. Pilot Feasibility Study of an Oncology Financial Navigation Program. J Oncol Pract. 2018 Feb;14(2):e122-e129. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.024927. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

    PMID: 29272200BACKGROUND
  • Rosenkrantz AB, Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Silva E 3rd, Duszak R Jr. Out-of-Pocket Costs for Advanced Imaging Across the US Private Insurance Marketplace. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Apr;15(4):607-614.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

    PMID: 29477290BACKGROUND
  • Sadigh G, Coleman D, Lava N, Switchenko J, Vargas D, Duszak R Jr, Carlos RC. Patient-Specific Out-of-Pocket Cost Communication and Remote Financial Navigation in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Jun;62:103797. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103797. Epub 2022 Apr 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple SclerosisFinancial Stress

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesStress, PsychologicalBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Gelareh Sadigh, MD

    Emory University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2020

First Posted

February 5, 2020

Study Start

March 3, 2020

Primary Completion

December 31, 2021

Study Completion

December 31, 2021

Last Updated

February 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the manuscript (including text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be made available for sharing, after deidentification.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Data will be made available for sharing beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.
Access Criteria
Data will be available to be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal in order to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to gsadigh@emory.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Locations