Watchful Waiting as a Strategy for Reducing Low-value Spinal Imaging
1 other identifier
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators will learn from the study whether actors playing the roles of patients (standardized patients) can help primary care and urgent care clinicians develop skill in offering watchful waiting to patients with acute low back pain as a means of averting low-value spinal imaging. Using patient and physician feedback, this study will refine and evaluate -- in a controlled experiment -- a simulated standardized patient intervention to enhance primary care physician use of watchful waiting when patients request low-value spinal imaging. The long-term goal of this study is to discover communication strategies primary care physicians can use to avert costly, potentially harmful testing while maintaining the patient-doctor relationship.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Oct 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2024
CompletedDecember 10, 2024
December 1, 2024
2.7 years
January 16, 2020
December 5, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adjusted rate of spinal imaging during 18-month follow-up
Rate of lumbar spinal x-ray, CT, or MRI during follow-up period, adjusted for imaging rate during 12 month pre-randomization period
18 months following date of first SPI visit
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Adjusted rate of advanced spinal imaging during 18-month follow-up
18 months following date of first SPI visit
Adjusted rate of lumbar x-ray imaging during 18-month follow-up
18 months following date of first SPI visit
Use of watchful waiting communication techniques based on coded transcripts
6 months post-intervention
Physician self-reported use of watchful waiting techniques in post-intervention questionnaires
6 months post-intervention
Adjusted rate of neck imaging during 18-month follow-up
18 months following date of first SPI visit
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALPrimary care and urgent care clinicians randomized to the intervention arm will receive two to three visits with a standardized patient instructor who will physicians how to facilitate patient acceptance of a watchful waiting strategy with regard to spinal imaging in the context of acute low back pain.
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORPrimary care and urgent care clinicians randomized to the control arm will receive a single visit with a standardized patient who simulates a visit with patient with acute low back pain but will deliver no instruction on patient communication or other content.
Interventions
Clinicians randomized to the control group will receive a single visit with a standardized patient instructor (SPI) scheduled during usual office hours. SPIs will portray a patients with acute back pain but will deliver no formative training or feedback to the primary care physicians randomized to the control arm.
Clinicians randomized to the intervention group will receive 2-3 visits with a standardized patient instructor (SPI) scheduled during usual office hours over \~3 month period. For intervention physicians, SPIs will portray patients with acute back pain and will provide formative feedback to physicians and specific instruction in communication techniques to facilitate patient acceptance of a watchful waiting strategy with respect to spinal imaging. The specific communication techniques and sequence will be determined based on pre-trial literature review, patient focus groups, and interviews of primary care physicians who will not participate in the trial.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- they intend to practice either at least 50% full-time equivalent (FTE) adult primary or urgent care in one of the target clinics for the trial duration
- they have been in active full-time or 50% FTE practice within the health system for at least two years prior to enrollment (to enable collection of baseline testing rates).
- Nurse practitioners and physicians assistants will be eligible if they practice in the capacity of a primary care or urgent care clinicians and meet the other requirement above.
You may not qualify if:
- None.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UC Davis Center for Healthcare Policy and Research
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Related Publications (2)
Fenton JJ, Jerant A, Franks P, Gosdin M, Fridman I, Cipri C, Weinberg G, Hudnut A, Tancredi DJ. Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial. Trials. 2021 Feb 27;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05106-x.
PMID: 33639993BACKGROUNDFenton JJ, Cipri C, Gosdin M, Tancredi DJ, Jerant A, Robinson CA, Xing G, Fridman I, Weinberg G, Hudnut A. Standardized Patient Communication and Low-Value Spinal Imaging: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2441826. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41826.
PMID: 39504026RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joshua J Fenton, MD, MPH
University of California, Davis
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2020
First Posted
February 5, 2020
Study Start
October 21, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2023
Study Completion
November 30, 2024
Last Updated
December 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data would be shared with other researchers if their research protocols were institutional review board approved, and our team had sufficient time and resources to generate the individual participant data for secure data transfer.