NCT04254081

Brief Summary

Cervical preparation with osmotic dilators is commonly used prior to dilation and evacuation (D\&E) procedures to decrease the risk of complications. Women have described the pain of osmotic dilator insertion as moderate to severe yet there have been few studies aimed at addressing pain during and after osmotic dilator insertion. In addition to the discomfort during insertion, pain after osmotic dilator insertion peaks at 2 hours post-insertion with use of a lidocaine paracervical block. One randomized trial found that use of a paracervical block with 1% buffered lidocaine decreased pain with osmotic dilator insertion compared to a sham block. There are adjunct treatments to optimize analgesia with local anesthetics at a variety of anatomic locations. Buprenorphine, a partial mu-opioid receptor agonist, has been found to increase the quality of the anesthetic at the time of administration and increase the duration of nerve block analgesia at several anatomic sites, though has never been studied as an adjunct in a paracervical block. This has been used extensively in orthopedic surgery with significant prolongation of the local anesthetic effect by almost threefold in some studies. Primary Aim: To compare the mean pain score at the time of osmotic dilator insertion among women randomized to a 1% lidocaine and buprenorphine paracervical block compared to a 1% lidocaine paracervical block alone. Secondary Aim: To compare the mean pain score 2 hours after osmotic dilator insertion among women randomized to a lidocaine and buprenorphine paracervical block compared to a lidocaine paracervical block alone. The investigators hypothesize that in patients undergoing osmotic dilator insertion in preparation for dilation and evacuation, the addition of buprenorphine 0.15mg to a 1% lidocaine paracervical block will be associated with lower mean pain scores at time of osmotic dilator insertion compared to women who receive a 1% lidocaine paracervical block alone.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
57

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2020

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 28, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 4, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 4, 2021

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

January 31, 2020

Results QC Date

April 28, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

AbortionOsmotic dilatorsCervical preparation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Score at the Time of Osmotic Dilator Insertion

    Median pain score on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) numeric rating scale at the time of osmotic dilator insertion

    Assessed immediately after last dilator inserted

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain Score 2 Hours After Osmotic Dilator Insertion

    2 hours after osmotic dilator insertion

  • Pain Score 1 Hour After Osmotic Dilator Insertion

    1 hour after osmotic dilator insertion

  • Pain Score 6 Hours After Osmotic Dilator Insertion

    6 hours after osmotic dilator insertion

  • Overall Satisfaction Scores

    Morning of D&E procedure: after check-in, before D&E

Study Arms (2)

Buprenorphine 0.15mg + 1% lidocaine paracervical block

EXPERIMENTAL

Paracervical block with 18mL of 1% lidocaine buffered with 2 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate plus 0.15mg of buprenorphine

Drug: Buprenorphine 0.15 MG

1% lidocaine paracervical block

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Paracervical block with 18 mL of 1% lidocaine buffered with 2 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate

Drug: Lidocaine 1% Injectable Solution

Interventions

Buprenorphine 0.15mg solution will be added to a 20mL 1% buffered lidocaine solution (paracervical block) which will be administered in the paracervical space prior to osmotic dilator insertion.

Buprenorphine 0.15mg + 1% lidocaine paracervical block

20mL of 1% buffered lidocaine solution (paracervical block) will be administered in the paracervical space prior to osmotic dilator insertion.

1% lidocaine paracervical block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Gestational age 14 0/7 weeks to 23 6/7 weeks at time of osmotic dilator insertion
  • Require cervical preparation with placement of osmotic dilators
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Fluent in English or Spanish

You may not qualify if:

  • Same day dilation and evacuation procedure
  • Request for sedation during osmotic dilator insertion
  • Liver disease
  • Allergy to buprenorphine, lidocaine, or ibuprofen
  • Narcotic or opioid medication use in the preceding 24 hours
  • Use of recreational/illicit medications in the preceding 24 hours
  • Currently incarcerated

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California San Diego Health

San Diego, California, 92093, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Schivone GB, Lerma K, Montgomery C, Wright P, Conti JA, Blumenthal PD, Shaw KA. Self-administered lidocaine gel for local anesthesia prior to osmotic dilator placement: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2019 Mar;99(3):148-151. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

    PMID: 30500336BACKGROUND
  • Soon R, Tschann M, Salcedo J, Stevens K, Ahn HJ, Kaneshiro B. Paracervical Block for Laminaria Insertion Before Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):387-392. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002149.

    PMID: 28697113BACKGROUND
  • Mercier RJ, Liberty A. Intrauterine lidocaine for pain control during laminaria insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

    PMID: 25139724BACKGROUND
  • Creinin MD, Schimmoeller NR, Matulich MC, Hou MY, Melo J, Chen MJ. Gabapentin for pain management after osmotic dilator insertion and prior to dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2020 Mar;101(3):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

    PMID: 31927028BACKGROUND
  • Kosel J, Bobik P, Tomczyk M. Buprenorphine--the unique opioid adjuvant in regional anesthesia. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9(3):375-83. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2016.1141047. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

    PMID: 26758991BACKGROUND
  • Bailard NS, Ortiz J, Flores RA. Additives to local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks: Evidence, limitations, and recommendations. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014 Mar 1;71(5):373-85. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130336.

    PMID: 24534592BACKGROUND
  • Swain A, Nag DS, Sahu S, Samaddar DP. Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends. World J Clin Cases. 2017 Aug 16;5(8):307-323. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v5.i8.307.

    PMID: 28868303BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, ProceduralDilatation, Pathologic

Interventions

BuprenorphineLidocaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Anatomical

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Results Point of Contact

Title
UCSD Family Planning Research
Organization
University of California, San Diego

Study Officials

  • Nicole Economou, MD

    UC San Diego Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sheila K Mody, MD, MPH

    UC San Diego Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
A clinician who will not be administering the paracervical block will open the designated sealed sequentially numbered opaque randomization envelope containing computer generated randomization code and prepare the designated paracervical block into two 10 mL syringes. The syringes used to prepare the medication will be identical between study groups and the solutions will appear visually identical. A different clinician blinded to the treatment group will perform the standardized procedure for osmotic dilator insertion.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a randomized, placebo controlled trial with stratified block randomization based on vaginal parity (vaginally nulliparous versus vaginally multiparous). Vaginal parity may influence pain during osmotic dilator insertion and thus the participants will be evenly distributed between strata.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2020

First Posted

February 5, 2020

Study Start

May 28, 2020

Primary Completion

May 4, 2021

Study Completion

May 4, 2021

Last Updated

August 1, 2023

Results First Posted

August 1, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Locations