NCT04252794

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators aim to prove that performing graft inflow modulation (GIM) in liver with portal hyper-perfusion is beneficial for early graft function postoperatively. Grafts at risk for portal hyper-perfusion will be identified by doing an intraoperative Doppler after reperfusion. In group A, the investigators will take 21 liver transplant recipients after reperfusion, randomly allocated, who will undergo intraoperative graft inflow modulation by splenic artery ligation. In group B, the investigators will be analyzing another randomly allocated 21 patients, who will not undergo any graft inflow modulation. The investigators will be analyzing trend of LFT's (liver function tests) after surgery, time for normalization of bilirubin, INR (international normalised ratio) and decrease in ascites, morbidity, mortality, ICU (intensive care unit) and total hospital stay.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 8, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 10, 2020

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2020

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 10, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

January 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 8, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of early graft dysfunction

    Number of patients who develop early graft dysfunction in each group

    first postoperative month

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Time to normalisation of bilirubin

    first postoperative month

  • Time to normalisation of INR

    first postoperative month

  • Time to normalisation of ascites output

    first postoperative month

  • Morbidity

    first postoperative month

  • ICU stay

    first operative month

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Patients who undergo GIM

EXPERIMENTAL

If inclusion criteria are met, after randomisation, these group of patients will undergo splenic artery ligation (graft inflow modulation)

Procedure: Splenic artery ligation

No splenic artery ligation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

If inclusion criteria are met, after randomisation, these group of patients will not undergo splenic artery ligation (graft inflow modulation)

Other: No intervention

Interventions

Splenic artery will be ligated just after takeoff from coeliac trunk at the level of body of pancreas

Patients who undergo GIM

Splenic artery is not ligated despite the presence of portal hyperperfusion

No splenic artery ligation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Portal Venous Pressure (PVP) \> 15 mm Hg after reperfusion or
  • Portal venous flow (PVF) \> 250 ml/min/100 gr of liver after reperfusion with a gradient (PVP - CVP) of ≥ 7 mm Hg

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant peripancreatic collaterals preventing safe access to splenic artery
  • Acute Liver Failure as an indication for transplant
  • ABO incompatible transplants
  • Pediatric transplants
  • Refusal to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences

New Delhi, 110074, India

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, Egawa H, Fujita S, Hayashi M, Tanaka K. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation. 1999 Jan 27;67(2):321-7. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199901270-00024.

  • Bell R, Pandanaboyana S, Upasani V, Prasad R. Impact of graft-to-recipient weight ratio on small-for-size syndrome following living donor liver transplantation. ANZ J Surg. 2018 May;88(5):415-420. doi: 10.1111/ans.14245.

  • Vasavada BB, Chen CL, Zakaria M. Portal flow is the main predictor of early graft dysfunction regardless of the GRWR status in living donor liver transplantation - a retrospective analysis of 134 patients. Int J Surg. 2014;12(2):177-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.12.006. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

  • Vasavada B, Chen CL, Zakaria M. Using low graft/recipient's body weight ratio graft with portal flow modulation an effective way to prevent small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplant: a retrospective analysis. Exp Clin Transplant. 2014 Oct;12(5):437-42.

  • Lei JY, Yan LN, Li B, Wen TF, Wang WT, Xu MQ, Yang JY. Graft size alone should not affect donors selection and be used to predict the prognosis of recipients after living donor liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Jan-Feb;59(113):224-7. doi: 10.5754/hge11035.

  • Demetris AJ, Kelly DM, Eghtesad B, Fontes P, Wallis Marsh J, Tom K, Tan HP, Shaw-Stiffel T, Boig L, Novelli P, Planinsic R, Fung JJ, Marcos A. Pathophysiologic observations and histopathologic recognition of the portal hyperperfusion or small-for-size syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Aug;30(8):986-93. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200608000-00009.

  • Shimamura T, Taniguchi M, Jin MB, Suzuki T, Matsushita M, Furukawa H, Todo S. Excessive portal venous inflow as a cause of allograft dysfunction in small-for-size living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2001 Feb-Mar;33(1-2):1331. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)02496-9. No abstract available.

  • Ou HY, Huang TL, Chen TY, Tsang LL, Chen CL, Cheng YF. Early modulation of portal graft inflow in adult living donor liver transplant recipients with high portal inflow detected by intraoperative color Doppler ultrasound. Transplant Proc. 2010 Apr;42(3):876-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.02.064.

  • Ogura Y, Hori T, El Moghazy WM, Yoshizawa A, Oike F, Mori A, Kaido T, Takada Y, Uemoto S. Portal pressure <15 mm Hg is a key for successful adult living donor liver transplantation utilizing smaller grafts than before. Liver Transpl. 2010 Jun;16(6):718-28. doi: 10.1002/lt.22059.

  • Wang H, Ikegami T, Harada N, Yoshizumi T, Soejima Y, Uchiyama H, Yamashita Y, Itoh S, Harimoto N, Kawanaka H, Shirabe K, Maehara Y. Optimal changes in portal hemodynamics induced by splenectomy during living donor liver transplantation. Surg Today. 2015 Aug;45(8):979-85. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0999-9. Epub 2014 Aug 2.

  • Luca A, Miraglia R, Caruso S, Milazzo M, Gidelli B, Bosch J. Effects of splenic artery occlusion on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Liver Transpl. 2006 Aug;12(8):1237-43. doi: 10.1002/lt.20762.

  • Osman AM, Hosny AA, El-Shazli MA, Uemoto S, Abdelaziz O, Helmy AS. A portal pressure cut-off of 15 versus a cut-off of 20 for prevention of small-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: A comparative study. Hepatol Res. 2017 Mar;47(4):293-302. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12727. Epub 2016 May 11.

  • Troisi R, de Hemptinne B. Clinical relevance of adapting portal vein flow in living donor liver transplantation in adult patients. Liver Transpl. 2003 Sep;9(9):S36-41. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50200.

  • Yamada T, Tanaka K, Uryuhara K, Ito K, Takada Y, Uemoto S. Selective hemi-portocaval shunt based on portal vein pressure for small-for-size graft in adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4):847-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02144.x. Epub 2008 Feb 5.

  • Umeda Y, Yagi T, Sadamori H, Matsukawa H, Matsuda H, Shinoura S, Mizuno K, Yoshida R, Iwamoto T, Satoh D, Tanaka N. Effects of prophylactic splenic artery modulation on portal overperfusion and liver regeneration in small-for-size graft. Transplantation. 2008 Sep 15;86(5):673-80. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318181e02d.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver Cirrhosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Liver DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesFibrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Gattu Tharun, MS

    Senior resident, Department of HPB surgery, ILBS, India

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Resident, HPB Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2020

First Posted

February 5, 2020

Study Start

August 8, 2019

Primary Completion

July 31, 2023

Study Completion

July 31, 2023

Last Updated

April 10, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations