NCT04252092

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of the sole of foot sensory education and electrical stimulation on proprioceptive and cortical senses in patients with acute hemiplegia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2020

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 17, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 22, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 19, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 25, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

December 17, 2019

Results QC Date

June 1, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 29, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Electrical stimulationSensory educationSensory evaluationStrokeProprioception

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Assessment Of Joint Position Sense

    Joint position sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. The patient's eyes will be closed. One of the foot on the hemiplegic side of the patient will be brought to a certain position and the patient will be asked to bring the other extremity to a similar position. In the case of the correct response to 8 and above from ten attempts, the sense of sensation is considered normal; correct response between 3-7, the sense of sensation is considered decreased; correct response 3 and below, the sense of sensation is considered lost. Higher scores mean better outcomes with 0 being minimum and 10 being maximum.

    Baseline and Week 3

  • Assesment of Joint Passive Motion Sense

    Joint passive motion sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. The patient's eyes will be closed. One of the patient's big toe in hemiplegic their side will be held on either side and moved up or down. During this time, the patient will be asked to indicate the direction of the movement. In the case of the correct response to 8 and above from ten attempts, the sense of sensation is considered normal; correct response between 3-7, the sense of sensation is considered decreased; correct response 3 and below, the sense of sensation is considered lost. Higher scores mean better outcomes with 0 being minimum and 10 being maximum.

    Baseline and Week 3

  • Assessment of Vibration Sense

    Vibration sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. It is evaluated with a vibrating diapason. While the eyes are closed, the diapason will be placed on the tip of the big toe of the hemiplegic foot, the patient will be asked if the vibration is felt or not. If it is felt, this time the patient will be asked to indicate the moment when the vibration ends. Thus, the time it detects the vibration is determined. This period is about 20 seconds in normal youth. As the age progresses, it should be remembered that vibration time is shortened in lower extremities.

    Baseline and Week 3

  • Assesment of Deep Pain Sense

    Deep pain sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. If the Achilles tendon is squeezed or the muscles are severely suppressed, it is investigated whether or not the pain is felt. If pain is felt, the result will be counted as positive. The positive result is an unwanted result.

    Baseline and Week 3

  • Assessment of Two-point Discrimination

    Two-point discrimination sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. The points of the blunt wig will be held against the hemiplegic sole of the foot at different distances from each other. Instruct the client to respond to each touch, by saying one point or two points. Eyes should be closed during the examination. When the patient feels two, it will be noted how far away in cm away from the wig.

    Baseline and Week 3

  • Assessment of Graphesthesia

    Graphesthesia assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. The patient will be asked to estimate a letter or number written the sole of the hemiplegic foot with a blunt object while the eyes are closed. In the case of the correct response to 8 and above from ten attempts, the sense of sensation is considered normal; correct response between 3-7, the sense of sensation is considered decreased; correct response 3 and below, the sense of sensation is considered lost. Higher scores mean better outcomes with 0 being minimum and 10 being maximum.

    Baseline and Week 3

  • Assessment of Tactile Localization Sense

    Tactile localization sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. Patients will be stimulated on 10 different locations of the hemiplegic sole of the foot. They will be asked to localize the touch. The response will be recorded. In the case of the correct response to 8 and above from ten attempts, the sense of sensation is considered normal; correct response between 3-7, the sense of sensation is considered decreased; correct response 3 and below, the sense of sensation is considered lost. Higher scores mean better outcomes with 0 being minimum and 10 being maximum.

    Baseline and Week 3

  • Assessment of Tactile Inattention

    Tactile inattention assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments.The patient will close his eyes. The right and the left half of the body will be needled at the same time. The patient with tactile inattention perceives only one of them which is counted as positive. The positive result is an unwanted result.

    Baseline and Week 3

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment Of Cognitive Level

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Sensory Group

EXPERIMENTAL

15 patients who will be applied 15 sessions of sensory training

Other: Sensory training

Electrical Stimulation Group

EXPERIMENTAL

15 patients who will be applied 15 sessions of electrical stimulation

Other: Electrical stimulation

Interventions

15 session,20 minutes sensory training program

Sensory Group

15 session,20 minutes electrical stimulation program

Electrical Stimulation Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participating to the study in a voluntary basis
  • Patients with 50-80 years old
  • A stroke diagnosis by a neurologist
  • A stroke attack within 6 months
  • Minimum 18 points from Mini Mental Test
  • Medically stable

You may not qualify if:

  • Unstable condition
  • Other neurological or orthopaedic problems that will affect function other than stroke
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Diabetic foot ulcers
  • Part/total foot amputation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eksen Sağlık

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HemiplegiaStrokeSensation Disorders

Interventions

Electric Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical StimulationInvestigative Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
PT,Cansu Hayıroğlu
Organization
Eksen Sağlık ve Rehabilitasyon

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2019

First Posted

February 5, 2020

Study Start

February 17, 2020

Primary Completion

April 22, 2020

Study Completion

August 25, 2020

Last Updated

October 22, 2020

Results First Posted

August 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Locations