Using Adalimumab Serum Concentration to Choose a Subsequent Biological DMARD in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Failing Adalimumab Treatment
ADDORA-switch
1 other identifier
interventional
86
1 country
2
Brief Summary
A potential application of therapeutic drug monitoring is to predict efficacy after switch to another biological in the case of inefficacy of the previous TNF-inhibitor (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. It has been shown that when antidrug antibodies against adalimumab are detected (resulting in lower drug serum concentrations) in patients failing adalimumab, a normal response to a next TNF blocker can be anticipated. However, when clinical response is unsatisfactory and no antidrug antibodies against the first TNFi are detected (generally drug levels are adequate in this case), this predicts a lower response to a next TNFi. This means drug resistant failure in the former, compared to class resistant failure in latter category of patients. The current RA treatment strategy after failure of the first TNF-inhibitor is to start either a second TNFi or a non-TNFi. However, by channelling patients with sufficient adalimumab concentration to a non-TNFi will provide higher chance of disease control. Patients with very low or undetectable drug levels have an equal or potential higher chance of disease control with a drug of the same class (i.e. another TNFi).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Jul 2020
Typical duration for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 31, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedNovember 18, 2023
November 1, 2023
3.8 years
January 8, 2020
November 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
mean time weighted DAS28-CRP
difference in mean time weighted DAS28-CRP between the two groups
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Good or moderate response according the EULAR response criteria
12 en 24 weeks
Minimal disease activity (DAS28-CRP<2.9)
24 weeks
Non-responders
24 weeks
Number of adverse events
24 weeks
Severity of adverse events
24 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Usual care group
ACTIVE COMPARATORBased on a secondary randomization schedule patients are treated with etanercept or a non-TNFi (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, or sarilumab)
'Drug concentration guided' group
EXPERIMENTALPatients with a concentration \<1.0 mg/L switch to etanercept and patients with a concentration ≥ 1.0 start a non-TNFi (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, or sarilumab)
Interventions
In the 'drug concentration guided' group, switching to subsequent biological is based on adalimumab trough concentration
In the usual care group, switch to subsequent biological is based on secondary randomisation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- rheumatoid arthritis patient, according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 and/or EULAR/ACR 2010 criteria;
- recently failed treatment with adalimumab (defined as DAS28-CRP \>2.9) and not treated with a subsequent bDMARD or target synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD)
- Received adalimumab for at least 10 weeks in standard dosing (40mg subcutaneously every other week, either in monotherapy or combined with methotrexate or leflunomide)
- Stop adalimumab due to inefficacy, either alone or combined with side effects
- who has agreed to participate (written informed consent);
- age 16 years or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Treatment with another TNF-inhibitor prior to adalimumab
- Treatment with all non-TNFi options (abatacept, rituximab, sarilumab and tocilizumab) prior to adalimumab
- scheduled surgery during the follow-up of the study or other pre-planned reasons for treatment discontinuation
- life expectancy shorter than follow-up period of the study;
- no possibility to safely receive an TNF-inhibitor or a non TNF-inhibitor
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Sint Maartenskliniek
Ubbergen, Gelderland, 6574NA, Netherlands
Reade Rheumatology Research Institute
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1056AB, Netherlands
Related Publications (4)
Cantini F, Niccoli L, Nannini C, Cassara E, Kaloudi O, Giulio Favalli E, Becciolini A, Benucci M, Gobbi FL, Guiducci S, Foti R, Mosca M, Goletti D. Second-line biologic therapy optimization in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Oct;47(2):183-192. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
PMID: 28413099BACKGROUNDHyrich KL, Lunt M, Watson KD, Symmons DP, Silman AJ; British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Outcomes after switching from one anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent to a second anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a large UK national cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jan;56(1):13-20. doi: 10.1002/art.22331.
PMID: 17195186BACKGROUNDJamnitski A, Bartelds GM, Nurmohamed MT, van Schouwenburg PA, van Schaardenburg D, Stapel SO, Dijkmans BA, Aarden L, Wolbink GJ. The presence or absence of antibodies to infliximab or adalimumab determines the outcome of switching to etanercept. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Feb;70(2):284-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.135111. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
PMID: 21068090BACKGROUNDL' Ami MJ, Ruwaard J, Krieckaert C, Nurmohamed MT, van Vollenhoven RF, Rispens T, Wolbink GJ. Serum drug concentrations to optimize switching from adalimumab to etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;48(4):266-270. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2019.1577915. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
PMID: 31012365BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gertjan Wolbink, PhD
Reade Rheumatology Research Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alfons A Den Broerder, PhD
Sint Maartenskliniek
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Rheumatologists and patients remain blinded for allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2020
First Posted
February 5, 2020
Study Start
July 31, 2020
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
November 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Six months after the study is published the data will be shared
- Access Criteria
- Researchers with demonstrable interest in autoimmunity, biologicals, or therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can contact the investigators of the trial if they are interested in gaining access to the data. Depending on their research objectives the data will be shared
To avoid duplication of research, the gathered data will be shared once all desirable data analysis have been performed and the results are published