Effects of Early Palliative Care Integration on Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
A Pilot Study to Determine the Effects of Early Palliative Care Integration on Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a common type of cancer involving the cells in the blood (commonly affecting bones, kidneys and blood). Although it remains incurable, MM has become a highly treatable form cancer thanks to new and improved treatment modalities. As patients deal with this disease, they often suffer from multiple symptoms that are caused by both the disease itself and the different drugs used to treat it. Research has shown that the most common symptoms patients suffer from include pain, constipation, tiredness, tingling in hands and feet, breathlessness, sadness and difficulty remembering things. These symptoms may negatively affect the quality of life of patients. Palliative care (PC) is a type of treatment aimed at relieving symptoms and promoting the most optimal quality of life (QOL) for patients and their caregivers. Research has shown that patients with certain types of cancers, such as colon cancer and lung cancer, do better if they are seen by a PC provider early in the course of their disease. This study seeks to determine the effects of early PC involvement on participants with newly diagnosed MM
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable multiple-myeloma
Started Feb 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 26, 2022
CompletedAugust 11, 2025
August 1, 2025
2.7 years
January 23, 2020
August 6, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
At baseline
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
3 months
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
6 months
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
9 months
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
12 months
Change in QOL relative to baseline as measured by FACT-MM scores
Change in QOL relative to baseline as measured by FACT-MM scores. The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
At baseline
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
3 months
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
6 months
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
9 months
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
12 months
Number of PC visits made in the first 12 months after diagnosis
Feasibility of monthly PC visits as measured by the number of PC visits made in the first 12 months after diagnosis
At 12 months
Health services utilization as measured by number of ER visits, hospital admissions or ICU admissions
Health services utilization as measured by number of ER visits, hospital admissions or ICU admissions
At 12 months
Study Arms (1)
Early Palliative Care Integration
EXPERIMENTAL12 months of PC with concurrent standard treatment for MM, QOL assessments
Interventions
Early PC Integration - Participants will meet with a member of the outpatient PC team, which consists of board-certified PC physicians, advance practice providers and nurse care coordinators, within three weeks of enrollment. Participants will be scheduled to meet with a PC provider at least once per month. Additional visits may be scheduled at the discretion of participants, oncologists or PC providers. All participants will receive routine oncologic care throughout the study period.
FACT-MM questionnaires will be administered by a research coordinator upon enrollment and at four time points from the date of enrollment: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. All questionnaires will be administered in handwritten paper-based form, and while patients are in clinic. There is a +/- two-week window for completion of questionnaires to accommodate patient schedules. The assessment battery takes approximately 20 minutes to complete.
HADS questionnaires will be administered by a research coordinator upon enrollment and at four time points from the date of enrollment: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. All questionnaires will be administered in handwritten paper-based form, and while patients are in clinic. There is a +/- two-week window for completion of questionnaires to accommodate patient schedules. The assessment battery takes approximately 20 minutes to complete.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be within eight weeks of being diagnosed with symptomatic MM based on current diagnostic criteria
- Able to read and respond to questions in English
- Have an ECOG performance status of 0, 1, 2 or 3
- Receiving oncologic care at a Cleveland Clinic facility
You may not qualify if:
- Have seen a PC provider in any setting (i.e., inpatient, outpatient or home-based)
- Need immediate referral to PC for hospice transition
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (1)
Samala RV, Nurse DP, Chen X, Wei W, Crook JJ, Fada SD, Valent J. Effects of early palliative care integration on patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 27;32(7):468. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08665-2.
PMID: 38937310DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Renato Samala, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2020
First Posted
January 30, 2020
Study Start
February 17, 2020
Primary Completion
October 26, 2022
Study Completion
October 26, 2022
Last Updated
August 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data from this pilot study will be used to design and power a larger prospective study.